DOI:
10.18413/2408-932X-2020-6-4-0-10
Using digital technologies in medicine: specifics of responsibility
The introduction of information technologies into healthcare practice changes the forms and methods of interaction between doctors and patients, the procedure for diagnosis and treatment, prevention of diseases and health recovery. Attention is drawn to the emerging digital divide between rich and poor countries, elderly and young users, other segments that have access to information technologies and potential to employ them. The specifics of responsibility in the application of digital technologies are pointed out. There is a tendency to remove responsibility for the patient's health from the institute of health care, for decisions made regarding methods of treatment and diagnostics, and transfer responsibility to an individual.
Keywords: digital medicine,
digital divide,
digital technologies,
risks and dangers,
responsibility,
ethical foundations of science,
telemedicine technologies.
Number of views: 926 (view statistics)
Количество скачиваний: 4108
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Aletdinova, A. A., Bakaev, M. A. (2016), “The economy of smart and AI-based education”, The Social Sciences, 11, issue 21, 5151-5156.
Avdeenko, T. V., Aletdinova, А. А. (2017), “Digitalization of the economy based on improving expert knowledge management systems”, Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie nauki [Scientific and technical Bulletin of Saint Petersburg State Polytechnic University. Economics], 10 (1), 7-18 (in Russ.).
Belyaletdinov, R. R. (2017), “‘Liberation’ of the patient: socio-humanitarian features of the formation of personalized medicine”, Filosofsko-antropologicheskie osnovaniya personalizirovannoy meditsini (mezhdistsiplinarniy analiz). Rabochie tetradi po bioetike [Philosophical and anthropological foundations of personalized medicine (interdisciplinary analysis). Workbooks on bioethics], in Tischenko, P. D. (ed.), Moscow state University for the Humanities publishing house, Moscow, Russia, 148-156 [Online], available at: https://iphras.ru/uplfile/humexp/rtb26.pdf (Accessed 15 August 2020) (in Russ.).
Chernikova, I. V. (ed.) (2015) Tekhnonauka i sotsial'naya otsenka tekhniki (filosofsko-metodologicheskiy analiz) [Technoscience and social assessment of technology (philosophical and methodological analysis)], Tomsk University Press, Tomsk (in Russ.).
Decree of the President of the Russian FederationNo. 203 of 09.05.2017, “On the strategy for the development of the information society in the Russian Federation for 2017-2030” [Online], available at: http://kremlin.ru/acts/bank/41919 (Accessed: 24 August 2020) (in Russ.).
Deleuze, G. (2016), “Тhe Society of control postscriptum”, Opustoshitel’ [Ravager] [Electronic], 19, available at: https://aitrus.info/node/754 (Accessed 15 August 2020) (in Russ.).
Federal law No. 242-FZ of July 29, 2017, “On amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation on the application of information technologies in the field of health protection” [Online], available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_221184/ (Accessed 24 August 2020) (in Russ.).
Grebenschikova, Е. G. (2015), “Personalization of medicine and medicalization of the future”, Filosofskie problemi biologii I meditsini. Sbornik statey Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo mediko-stomatologicheskogo universiteta [Philosophical problems of biology and medicine. Collected papers], A. I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia, 75-77 (in Russ.).
Habermas, Yu. (2002), Buduschee chelovecheskoy prirody [The Future of human nature], Translated by M. L. Hor'kov, Ves’ Mir, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).
Health inequalities and eHealth. Report of the eHealth Stakeholder Group. Auderghem: European Commission Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology (2014) [Online], available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/330370/9789289059985-rus.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (Accessed 7 July 2020) (in Russ.).
Illich, I. (1976), Predely meditsyny, ili Meditsinskaya Nemezida [Limits of medicine, or Medical Nemesis] [Online], available at: http://www.pubhealth.spb.ru/Illich/NemesisEpid.htm (Accessed 15 August 2020) (in Russ.).
Izhevskaya, V. L. (2017), “Ethical problems of using new technologies of prenatal screening”, Filosofsko-antropologicheskie osnovaniya personalizirovannoy meditsiny (mezhdistsyplinarniy analiz). Rabochie tetradi po bioetike, sbornik nauchnykh ststey [Philosophical and anthropological foundations of personalized medicine (interdisciplinary analysis). Workbooks on bioethics, collection of scientific articles], in Tishchenko, P. D. (ed.), Publishing House of Moscow Humanitarian University, Moscow, Russia, 64-77 [Online], available at: https://iphras.ru/uplfile/humexp/rtb26.pdf (Accessed 15 August 2020) (in Russ.).
Morozov, S. P., Vladzimirsky, A. V., Varyushin, M. S. and Aronov, A. V. (2018), “Distribution of responsibility for low-quality medical care when using telemedicine technologies”, Zhurnal telemeditsyny i elektronnogo zdravookhraneniya [Journal of telemedicine and electronic health care], [Electronic], 2018, 1-2, available at: http://jtelemed.ru/article/raspredelenie-otvetstvennosti-za-nekachestvennoe-okazanie-medicinskoj-pomoshhi-pri-ispolzova (Accessed 24 August 2020) (in Russ.).
Popova, O. V. (2017), “The Problem of personality and individuality in the context of personalized medicine development” Filosofsko-antropologicheskie osnovaniya personalizirovannoy meditsiny (mezhdistsyplinarniy analiz). Rabochie tetradi po bioetike, sbornik nauchnykh ststey [Philosophical and anthropological foundations of personalized medicine (interdisciplinary analysis). Workbooks on bioethics, collection of scientific articles], in Tishchenko, P. D. (ed.), Publishing house of the Moscow humanitarian University, Moscow, Russia, 45-52 [Online], available at: https://iphras.ru/uplfile/humexp/rtb26.pdf (Accessed: 24 August 2020) (in Russ.).
Sidorova, T. A. (2015), “Ethical consequences of eugenic effects of preimplantation genetic diagnostics of embryos”, Filosofsko-antropologicheskie osnovaniya personalizirovannoy meditsiny (mezhdistsyplinarniy analiz). Rabochie tetradi po bioetike, sbornik nauchnykh ststey [Philosophical and anthropological foundations of personalized medicine (interdisciplinary analysis). Workbooks on bioethics, collection of scientific articles], in Tishchenko, P. D. (ed.), Publishing House of Moscow Humanitarian University, Moscow, Russia, 172-191 (in Russ.).
Suchkov, S. V., Abe, Kh., Antonova, E. N., Barakh, P. and al. (2017), “Personalized medicine as an updated model of the national health system. Part 1: Strategic aspects of infrastructure”, Rossiyskiy vestnik perinatologii i pediatrii [Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics], [Electronic], 62 (3), 10, available at: https://iphras.ru/uplfile/humexp/rtb26.pdf (Accessed 24 August 2020) (in Russ.).
Tishchenko, P. D. (2017), “Personalized medicine, consumerism and life practices of ‘self-care’”, Filosofsko-antropologicheskie osnovaniya personalizirovannoy meditsiny (mezhdistsyplinarniy analiz). Rabochie tetradi po bioetike, sbornik nauchnykh ststey [Philosophical and anthropological foundations of personalized medicine (interdisciplinary analysis). Workbooks on bioethics, collection of scientific articles], in Tishchenko, P. D. (ed.), Publishing house of the Moscow humanitarian University, Moscow, Russia, 26-44 [Online], available at: https://iphras.ru/uplfile/humexp/rtb26.pdf (Accessed: 24 August 2020) (in Russ.).