What is perspectivism?
Since Nietzsche, the term “perspectivism” has been used as the name for an ill-defined epistemological position. Some have tried to find an adequate meaning for the word “perspectivism,” tacitly investing it with a set of different predicates, such as “the dependence of cognition on position,” “pluralism,” “anti-universalism,” “epistemic humility,” etc. This approach is related to two contestable attitudes: the monolateral linguistic paradigm and the metaepistemological position of multiplicity of incompatible epistemological programs. The monolateral linguistic paradigm proceeds from the assumption that there is no obligatory connection between word and meaning. This makes it possible to denote logical content by any possible sign, and to explicate the sign in any number of ways. The metaepistemological position of multiplicity of incompatible epistemological programs encourages the support of artificial antagonism in the theory of cognition and the creation of “new” positions with different denotations. These attitudes can be contrasted with the method of empirical “originalist” analysis within the bilateral paradigm, as well as the theory of one epistemology and universal epistemic language. The content of the term “perspectivism” can be reconstructed by analyzing the original meanings of its individual constituent morphemes and their combination. The extremely precise and empirically provable definition of the word “perspectivism” is “the tendency to act by seeing through something”. This points to the problem of the impossibility of analytically deducing from it “the dependence of cognition on position,” “pluralism,” and other predicates. The same problem of inconsistency between the name of the epistemological position and its content is also encountered, for example, in the literature on relativism. It freely attributes a set of doctrinal beliefs to the term “relativism” without explicit linguistic signification of the predicates and blurs the difference between perspectivism and relativism. This points to the inexpediency of constructing epistemological positions on the basis of words denoting one of all possible interrelated cognitive actions, and the need to rethink epistemological practice.
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Asmuth, C. and Landenne, Q. (2018), “Introduction. Can perspectivity be defined in perspective?”, Perspektivität als Grundstruktur der Erkenntnis [Perspectivity as the basic structure of knowledge], in Asmuth, C. and Landenne, Q. (eds.), Koenigshausen & Neumann, Würzburg, Germany, 3-18 (in Germ.).
Baghramian, M. and Coliva, A. (2019), Relativism: New Problems of Philosophy, Routledge.
Boghossian, P. (2006), Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Crețu, A.-M. and Massimi, M. (2020), “Knowledge from a Human Point of View”, Synthese,Library 416, SpringerOpen [Online], available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338319409_Knowledge_from_a_Human_Point_of_View (Accessed 4 July 2022). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-27041-4.
Frisk, H. (1960), Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch [Greek Etymological Dictionary], Carl Winter, Heidelberg, Germany (in Germ.).
Gebser, J. (1999). “Origin and Present”, Gesamtausgabe: In 8 Bändern. Bände 2-4. Zweite Auflage [Complete edition: In 8 vol. Vol. 2-4. Second ed.], Novalis, Schaffhausen (in Germ.).
Giere, R. N. (2006), Scientific Perspectivism, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Graumann, C. F. (1960), Grundlagen einer Phänomenologie und Psychologie der Perspektivität [Foundations of a phenomenology and psychology of perspective], De Gruyter, Berlin, Germany (in Germ.).
Haberland, H. (2019), “On the Limits of Etymology”, Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics, 51, 1, 90-103, DOI: 10.1080/03740463.2019.1625556
Hegel, G. W. F. (1986), “Relationship of skepticism to philosophy. Presentation of its various modifications and comparison of the newest with the old. 1802 / ed. v. Eva Moldenhauer”, Klaus Michel. Werke. Bd. 2 [Klaus Michel. Works. Vol. 2], Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 217-272 (in Germ.).
Irlenborn, B. (2016), Relativismus (Grundthemen Philosophie) [Relativism (basic themes of philosophy)], De Gruyter, Berlin, Germany (in Germ.).
Kimelyov, Yu. A. (1998), Filosofiya religii: sistematicheskiy ocherk [Philosophy of Religion: A Systematic Essay], Nota Bene, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).
Krug, W. T. (2010), Encyklopädisches Lexikon in Bezug auf die neueste Literatur und Geschichte der Philosophie [Encyclopedic lexicon in relation to the latest literature and history of philosophy], Nabu Press, Leipzig, Germany (in Germ.).
Lewin, M. R., Chaly, V. A., Lugovoy, S. V. and Kornilaev, L. Yu. (2023), “History of Perspectivism and the Status of Perspectivist Concepts”, Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 39 (2), 249-260, DOI: 10.21638/spbu17.2023.204 (in Russ.).
Massimi, M. (2018a), “Four Kinds of Perspectival Truth”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 96 (2), 342-359, DOI: 10.1111/phpr.12300
Massimi, M. (2018b). “Perspectivism”, in Saatsi, J. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism, 13, Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy, Routledge, 164-175.
Massimi, M. and McCoy, C. D. (ed.) (2020), Understanding Perspectivism: Scientific Challenges and Methodological Prospects, Routledge, New York, London, DOI: 10.4324/9781315145198
Nietzsche, F. (1990), “The Gay Science”, Sochineniya: V 2 t. T. 1 [Works: In 2 vols. Vol. 1], Mysl', Moscow, Russia, 491-719 (in Russ.).
Recanati, F. (2007), Perspectival Thought. A Plea for (Moderate) Relativism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Rescher, N. (2006), “The Limits of Cognitive Relativism”, Collected Papers, Vol. 14: Studies in Epistemology, 1-24.
Sass, H. von. (ed.) (2019), “Perspectives on the Perspective”, Perspektivismus. Neue Beiträge aus der Erkenntnistheorie, Hermeneutik und Ethik [Perspectiveism. New contributions from epistemology, hermeneutics and ethics], Meiner, Hamburg, Germany, 9-34 (in Germ.).
Smith, P. (2016), Greek and Latin Roots: for Science and the Social Sciences, Part I – Latin, University of Victoria is used under a CC BY 4.0 International License, Victoria, BC.
Strauß, G. (1996). “Word – meaning – concept: relations and their history”, in Grabowski, J., Harras, G. and Herrmann, T. (ed.), Bedeutung – Konzepte – Bedeutungskonzepte. Theorie und Anwendung in Linguistik und Psychologie [Meaning – concepts – concepts of meaning. Theory and application in linguistics and psychology], Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, Germany, 22-46 (in Germ.).
Vaan de, M. (2008), Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages, Brill, Leiden, Boston.
Volbers, J. (2019). “Perspective is not a “cage”. A brief introduction to the focus”, Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie [General Journal of Philosophy], 44, 3, 241-249, DOI: 10.5771/0340-7969-2019-3 (in Germ.).
Williamson, T. (2022), The Philosophy of Philosophy, 2nd ed., Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken and Chichester.
The research is supported by the Russian Science Foundation, grant number 22-28-02041, https://rscf.ru/project/22-28-02041/, project “Perspectivism as an Epistemological Program”, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University (IKBFU), Kaliningrad.