<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-932X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-932X</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-932X-2015-1-4-17-19</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">105</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>RESEARCHES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>LATE ANTIQUITY: NEW METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO TRANSITIONAL HISTORICAL ERA</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>LATE ANTIQUITY: NEW METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO TRANSITIONAL HISTORICAL ERA</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Bolgov</surname><given-names>Nikolai N.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Bolgov</surname><given-names>Nikolai N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>bolgov@bsu.edu.ru</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/humanities/2015/4/Bolgov.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The article analyzes the problem of modern methodological approaches to the first inter-civilization transitional era in Europe history – Late Antiquity. During the 60-ies of the twentieth century the traditional approach about the decline and the fall of Rome turned out to be exhausted. Since 70th, due to the P. Brown's works and the works of British school a new understanding of this historical period developed as a self-sufficient subcivilization the essence of which was the gradual transformation of complex processes within the dynamic model «continuity–discontinuity». A wide field of research was opened. However, there is a number of problems still, in particular, the issue about the territorial and chronological framework. Besides, the attitude to this concept is more restrained in European historiography. Its methodological aspects are not emphasized actually. There is no an independent school of Late Antiquity study in Russia – the experts operate either in the field of antiquity, or in the field of Byzantine studies.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article analyzes the problem of modern methodological approaches to the first inter-civilization transitional era in Europe history – Late Antiquity. During the 60-ies of the twentieth century the traditional approach about the decline and the fall of Rome turned out to be exhausted. Since 70th, due to the P. Brown's works and the works of British school a new understanding of this historical period developed as a self-sufficient subcivilization the essence of which was the gradual transformation of complex processes within the dynamic model «continuity–discontinuity». A wide field of research was opened. However, there is a number of problems still, in particular, the issue about the territorial and chronological framework. Besides, the attitude to this concept is more restrained in European historiography. Its methodological aspects are not emphasized actually. There is no an independent school of Late Antiquity study in Russia – the experts operate either in the field of antiquity, or in the field of Byzantine studies.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Late Antiquity</kwd><kwd>Middle Ages</kwd><kwd>The Roman Empire</kwd><kwd>Early Byzantium</kwd><kwd>historiography</kwd><kwd>historical science</kwd><kwd>transitivity</kwd><kwd>historical school</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Late Antiquity</kwd><kwd>Middle Ages</kwd><kwd>The Roman Empire</kwd><kwd>Early Byzantium</kwd><kwd>historiography</kwd><kwd>historical science</kwd><kwd>transitivity</kwd><kwd>historical school</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Bolgova,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;M., Bolgov,&amp;nbsp;N.&amp;nbsp;N., Lipich&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;V. and V.&amp;nbsp;I.&amp;nbsp;Shilov. The Study of Gaza School of Rhetoric in Recent Years // Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin. Series: History. Political science. Economy. Computer science. Issue&amp;nbsp;32. No.&amp;nbsp;21(192) (2014). Pp.&amp;nbsp;43-46.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Bowersock,&amp;nbsp;G.&amp;nbsp;W., Brown,&amp;nbsp;P. and Grabar,&amp;nbsp;O. (eds.). Interpreting of Late Antiquity: Essays on the Postclassical World. Cambridge MA, Harvard UP, 2001. 320&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Bowersock,&amp;nbsp;G.&amp;nbsp;W., Brown,&amp;nbsp;P. and Grabar,&amp;nbsp;O. (eds.). Late Antiquity: A Guide to the Postclassical World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1999. 802&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Brown,&amp;nbsp;P. Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity: Towards a Christian Empire. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1992. 182&amp;nbsp;р.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Brown,&amp;nbsp;P. The Making of Late Antiquity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP, 1978. viii, 135&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Brown,&amp;nbsp;P. The World of Late Antiquity. AD&amp;nbsp;150-750. London: Thames and Hudson, 1971. 216&amp;nbsp;р.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Cameron,&amp;nbsp;A. The Mediterranean World in Late Antiquity. AD&amp;nbsp;395-600. London; New York: Routledge, 1993. xv, 251&amp;nbsp;р.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Cameron,&amp;nbsp;A., Ward-Perkins,&amp;nbsp;B. and Whitby,&amp;nbsp;M. (eds.). Cambridge Ancient History. Vol.&amp;nbsp;14. Late Antiquity: Empire and Successors, AD&amp;nbsp;425&amp;ndash;600. Cambridge, 2000. 1123&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Jones,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;H.&amp;nbsp;M. The Later Roman Empire, AD&amp;nbsp;284&amp;ndash;602: a Social, Economic and Administrative Survey. 2&amp;nbsp;vols. Oxford: Blackwell, 1964.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Selunskaya,&amp;nbsp;N.&amp;nbsp;A. &amp;laquo;Late Antiquity&amp;raquo;: Historical Concept, Historiographical Tradition and the Seminar &amp;laquo;Empires unlimited&amp;raquo;. Journal of Ancient History. No.&amp;nbsp;1 (2005). Pp.&amp;nbsp;249-253.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>The Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire. Vol.&amp;nbsp;1. AD&amp;nbsp;260&amp;ndash;395 / Ed. by A.H.M.&amp;nbsp;Jones, J.R.&amp;nbsp;Martindale and J.&amp;nbsp;Morris. Cambridge, 1971. Vol.&amp;nbsp;2. AD&amp;nbsp;395&amp;ndash;527 / Ed. by J.R.&amp;nbsp;Martindale. Cambridge, 1980. Vol.&amp;nbsp;3. AD&amp;nbsp;527&amp;ndash;647. Cambridge, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Vascheva,&amp;nbsp;I.&amp;nbsp;Yu. Late antiquity concept in modern historiography. Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod. No.&amp;nbsp;6(1) (2009). Pp.&amp;nbsp;220-231.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>