<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-932X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-932X</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-932X-2015-1-4-76-81</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">114</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>MISCCELLANEOUS: MESSAGES, DISCUSSIONS, REVIEWS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>VISUALLY-VALUE SPACE OF CULTURE IN THE CONTEXT  OF ETHNO-ART EXPERIENCE</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>VISUALLY-VALUE SPACE OF CULTURE IN THE CONTEXT  OF ETHNO-ART EXPERIENCE</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Shvedova</surname><given-names>Irina V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Shvedova</surname><given-names>Irina V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>irinasventa@gmail.com</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/humanities/2015/4/Shvedova.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The article raises the question of consideration of the specifics of valuable cultural grounds on the basis of the analysis of visual perception, combined with the philosophical understanding of the selected categories. The author refers to the visual component of folk culture, expressed in ethnic and cultural archetypes and used in regional embroidery materials, including textiles collected by the funds of Belgorod State Museum of Folk Culture. Through the selected graphic material, the author draws parallels between the symbols and the higher triads of universal values allocated by Rickert. The study, in particular, is based on the concept of G. Deleuze, who presented the process of knowing the truth as the everyday experience of decoding signs whose top hierarchy is represented by works of art. The unity of the material and the spiritual meaning of the sign, typical of any work of art, is peculiar to the traditional language of folk art and culture which has long been an expresser of a certain indicator of its «common place». In terms of the «visual turn» in the XXI century, according to the author, the use of this technique opens new prospects for a full inclusion of ethnoart experience in creative and existential everyday human life.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article raises the question of consideration of the specifics of valuable cultural grounds on the basis of the analysis of visual perception, combined with the philosophical understanding of the selected categories. The author refers to the visual component of folk culture, expressed in ethnic and cultural archetypes and used in regional embroidery materials, including textiles collected by the funds of Belgorod State Museum of Folk Culture. Through the selected graphic material, the author draws parallels between the symbols and the higher triads of universal values allocated by Rickert. The study, in particular, is based on the concept of G. Deleuze, who presented the process of knowing the truth as the everyday experience of decoding signs whose top hierarchy is represented by works of art. The unity of the material and the spiritual meaning of the sign, typical of any work of art, is peculiar to the traditional language of folk art and culture which has long been an expresser of a certain indicator of its «common place». In terms of the «visual turn» in the XXI century, according to the author, the use of this technique opens new prospects for a full inclusion of ethnoart experience in creative and existential everyday human life.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>culture</kwd><kwd>tradition</kwd><kwd>values</kwd><kwd>art experience</kwd><kwd>visual turn</kwd><kwd>ethno-cultural archetypes</kwd><kwd>ethno-art experience</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>culture</kwd><kwd>tradition</kwd><kwd>values</kwd><kwd>art experience</kwd><kwd>visual turn</kwd><kwd>ethno-cultural archetypes</kwd><kwd>ethno-art experience</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Windelband,&amp;nbsp;W. Philosophy of Culture. Favorites. Moscow: INION. 1994. 350&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Gorodtsov,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;A. Dacian and Sarmatian Religious Elements in Russian Folklore. Works of the State Historical Museum. Iss.&amp;nbsp;1. Moscow. 1926. Pp.&amp;nbsp;7-36.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Deleuze,&amp;nbsp;J. Marcel Proust and Signs. St. Petersburg: Aleteiya, 1999. 189&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Cassirer,&amp;nbsp;E. Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Vol.&amp;nbsp;1. Moscow and St. Petersburg: Universitetskaya Kniga. 2002. 272&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Kutenkov,&amp;nbsp;P.&amp;nbsp;I. Russian Women&amp;#39;s &amp;laquo;Sryada&amp;raquo; (Clothing.). Syademskaya and Vyazemskaya Peasant Generic Cultures (Mid 19th &amp;ndash; Early 20th century.). Book&amp;nbsp;1. Part&amp;nbsp;1. St. Petersburg: Edition of St. Petersburg State University Faculty of Philology and Arts. 2010. 288&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Lekhtsier,&amp;nbsp;B.&amp;nbsp;L. Introduction to the Phenomenology of the Artistic Experience. Samara: Samara University Publishing House. 2000. 236&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Ohrid Nicholas, bishop. Symbols. K Svetu. Iss.&amp;nbsp;17. Moscow: JSC Typography &amp;laquo;Novosti&amp;raquo;. 1995.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Rickert,&amp;nbsp;H. The Boundaries of a Natural-Science Formation of Concepts: a Logical Introduction to the History of Science. St. Petersburg: Nauka. 1997. 532&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Rybakov,&amp;nbsp;B.&amp;nbsp;А. Paganism of the Ancient Slavs. Moscow: Nauka. 1981. 406&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Spinoza,&amp;nbsp;B. Ethics. Minsk: &amp;laquo;Kharvest&amp;raquo;; Moscow: AST. 2001. 336&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Shvedova,&amp;nbsp;I.&amp;nbsp;V. (Composer). Art in Time: Synchronization of Events of National History and History of Art; a Tree of Styles: Methodical Bank. Belgorod: Publishing House &amp;laquo;Belgorod&amp;raquo;. 2012. 82&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>