<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-932X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-932X</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413 /2408-932X-2015-1-3-8-17</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">116</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>RESEARCHES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>PHILOSOPHY OF DIALOGUE OF EUGEN ROSENSTOCK-HUESSY AND CONTEMPORARY EDUCATION</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>PHILOSOPHY OF DIALOGUE OF EUGEN ROSENSTOCK-HUESSY AND CONTEMPORARY EDUCATION</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Monastyrskaya</surname><given-names>Irina A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Monastyrskaya</surname><given-names>Irina A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>Mirina70@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Belgorod State Technological University named after V.G. Shukhov</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/humanities/2015/3/Monastyrskaya.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The idea of advanced education, corresponding to the modern technotronic community of risks, reflects the position of the teacher and students in the understanding (cognition) of the world and themselves in the world. In this connection, the great importance is acquired by learning, practical understanding of philosophy of dialogue that can be seen as a paradigm of modern education. The article analyzes the modern concept of education as education for life, the basic principles of which are approved by the Bologna Declaration (1993) and are recommended for reforms in the systems of education in the world. The study examines the philosophy of dialogue of Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy (1888-1973), a German-American philosopher, scientist, educator, and theologian. His concept of dialogical thinking as "verbal thinking" compared with other thinkers such as M. Buber, F. Rosenzweig, M. Bakhtin, S. Frank, remains understudied in national philosophy and science.
The dialogical method developed by Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy considers education "as a great model of life taking place in time", and here advanced consciousness acts as a driving force. Readiness for the new, the need for this new is a challenge for many of today's learners. "Grammatical method" (dialogic) of Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy which is expressed in "verbal thinking" as the unity of four orientations of speech- imperative, subjective, trajectory and analytical (objective) acts as methodology and methods of teaching and development of the individual. In this age and historical sequence the person and the human community are formed in the dialogue area from "You" and "I" to "We" and "They".</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The idea of advanced education, corresponding to the modern technotronic community of risks, reflects the position of the teacher and students in the understanding (cognition) of the world and themselves in the world. In this connection, the great importance is acquired by learning, practical understanding of philosophy of dialogue that can be seen as a paradigm of modern education. The article analyzes the modern concept of education as education for life, the basic principles of which are approved by the Bologna Declaration (1993) and are recommended for reforms in the systems of education in the world. The study examines the philosophy of dialogue of Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy (1888-1973), a German-American philosopher, scientist, educator, and theologian. His concept of dialogical thinking as "verbal thinking" compared with other thinkers such as M. Buber, F. Rosenzweig, M. Bakhtin, S. Frank, remains understudied in national philosophy and science.
The dialogical method developed by Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy considers education "as a great model of life taking place in time", and here advanced consciousness acts as a driving force. Readiness for the new, the need for this new is a challenge for many of today's learners. "Grammatical method" (dialogic) of Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy which is expressed in "verbal thinking" as the unity of four orientations of speech- imperative, subjective, trajectory and analytical (objective) acts as methodology and methods of teaching and development of the individual. In this age and historical sequence the person and the human community are formed in the dialogue area from "You" and "I" to "We" and "They".</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>dialog</kwd><kwd>philosophy of dialogue</kwd><kwd>continuing education</kwd><kwd>advanced consciousness</kwd><kwd>"live knowledge"</kwd><kwd>"verbal thinking"</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>dialog</kwd><kwd>philosophy of dialogue</kwd><kwd>continuing education</kwd><kwd>advanced consciousness</kwd><kwd>"live knowledge"</kwd><kwd>"verbal thinking"</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Bakhtin,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;M. Problems of Dostoevsky&amp;#39;s Poetics. Moscow: Sovetskaya Rossiya, 1979. 320&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Kireevsky,&amp;nbsp;I.&amp;nbsp;V. Criticism and Aesthetics. Moscow: Mysl&amp;rsquo;, 1998. 276&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Towards Knowledge Societies. UNESCO World Report. Paris, 2005. URL: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001418/141843r.pdf (date of access: June 15, 2015).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Mamardashvili,&amp;nbsp;М. How I Understand The Philosophy. Moscow: Progress, 1990. 368&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Monastyrskaya,&amp;nbsp;I.&amp;nbsp;A. &amp;laquo;The Grammatical Method&amp;raquo; of Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy as a Methodology of the Humanities. The Methodology of the Humanities in the Perspective of The XXI Century. On the 80th Aanniversary of Prof. M.&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;Kagan. Series &amp;laquo;Symposium&amp;raquo;. 2001. Iss.&amp;nbsp;12. St. Petersburg. Pp.&amp;nbsp;87-92. URL:</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>http://anthropology.ru/ru/person/monastyrskaya-ia/text/grammaticheskiy-metod-o-rozenshtoka-hyussi-kak-metodologiya (date of access: June 15, 2015).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Monastyrskaya,&amp;nbsp;I.&amp;nbsp;A. The Problem of Demand for Text in the Dialogic Conception of Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy. Culture. Policy. Understanding. Belgorod: LTD &amp;laquo;Epitsentr&amp;raquo;, 2014. Pp.&amp;nbsp;175-177.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Rosenstock-Huessy,&amp;nbsp;E. Farewell to Descartes. Voprosy filosofii. 1997. №&amp;nbsp;8. Pp.&amp;nbsp;139-147.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Rosenstock-Huessy,&amp;nbsp;E. Workers Are Taught Too Little, and Teachers Teach Too Many: The Solution by Augustine to The Riddle of Time. The Language of the Human Race. Moscow; St. Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga, 2000. Pp.&amp;nbsp;36-76.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Rosenstock-Huessy,&amp;nbsp;E. Back to the Risk of Language (Papyrus, Which Could Be Ffound). God Causes Us to Talk. Moscow: Kanon +, 1997. Pp.&amp;nbsp;134-176.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Rosenstock-Huessy,&amp;nbsp;E. Speech and Reality. Moscow: Labirint, 1994. 213&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Rosenstock-Huessy,&amp;nbsp;E. Great Revolutions. Autobiography of a Western Man. Moscow: Biblical Theological Institute of St. Apostle Andrew, 2002. 648&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Rosenstock,&amp;nbsp;Eugen. Soziologie I: Die Kr&amp;auml;fte der Gemeinschaft. Berlin-Leipzig: Georg Reimer, 1925. 264&amp;nbsp;s.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Rosenstock-Huessy,&amp;nbsp;E. &amp;ldquo;Es regnet&amp;rdquo; oder die Sprache steht auf dem Kopf. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 1994. №&amp;nbsp;4-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Heidegger,&amp;nbsp;М. From the Dialogue of Language. Between Japanese and Asking. Time and Being. Moscow: Respublika, 1993. Pp.&amp;nbsp;273-312.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Khomyakov,&amp;nbsp;A.S. The Works on Theology. The Works in 2&amp;nbsp;vols. Vol.&amp;nbsp;2. Moscow: &amp;laquo;Medium&amp;raquo;, 1994. 478&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>