2408-932XResearch Result. Social Studies and Humanities2408-932X10.18413/2408-932X-2018-4-4-0-71542MISCCELLANEOUS: MESSAGES, DISCUSSIONS, REVIEWSMOTIVATIONAL AND ESTIMATION CRITERION OF WILLINGNESS OF PEOPLE TO PROVIDE THE CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT AT THE LOCAL LEVELMOTIVATIONAL AND ESTIMATION CRITERION OF WILLINGNESS OF PEOPLE TO PROVIDE THE CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT AT THE LOCAL LEVELDavtyanDianna V.DavtyanDianna V.davtyan@bsu.edu.ruKhripkovKirill A.KhripkovKirill A.khripkov@bsu.edu.ruBelgorod State National Research University, 85, Pobedy St., Belgorod, 308015, Russia20184400

The main trend of the elite public policy since the second half of the 80-ies of the last century is the democratization of public life and development of civil society in Russia. Its implementation is associated with the design and introduction of a set of mechanisms that determine the relationship between the individual and social institutions of various levels and functional purpose. One such mechanism is civilian oversight over authorities. Ideologues of democracy believe that it allows to improve the efficiency of the power structures and minimize their deviation. The changes that are currently taking place in Russia make a significant adjustment to the behavior patterns characteristic of Russian citizens. In connection with the new understanding of the role of the citizen, the development of institutions of governmental authority and local self-government, there is a real need to find some new approaches to defining the essence of the concept of civilian oversight. This is especially important because most existing concepts cannot explain, why Russian people even with external promotion of civilian oversight are extremely reluctant to participate in it. In this regard, we believe it is important to examine not only the technological component of civilian oversight, but also the motivational and estimation component that can be made explicit by the inducement of people to it, underpinned by commonality of values and interests of municipal community and willingness to cooperate

The main trend of the elite public policy since the second half of the 80-ies of the last century is the democratization of public life and development of civil society in Russia. Its implementation is associated with the design and introduction of a set of mechanisms that determine the relationship between the individual and social institutions of various levels and functional purpose. One such mechanism is civilian oversight over authorities. Ideologues of democracy believe that it allows to improve the efficiency of the power structures and minimize their deviation. The changes that are currently taking place in Russia make a significant adjustment to the behavior patterns characteristic of Russian citizens. In connection with the new understanding of the role of the citizen, the development of institutions of governmental authority and local self-government, there is a real need to find some new approaches to defining the essence of the concept of civilian oversight. This is especially important because most existing concepts cannot explain, why Russian people even with external promotion of civilian oversight are extremely reluctant to participate in it. In this regard, we believe it is important to examine not only the technological component of civilian oversight, but also the motivational and estimation component that can be made explicit by the inducement of people to it, underpinned by commonality of values and interests of municipal community and willingness to cooperate

local self-governmentcivilian oversightjusticeconsolidationself-organizationcivic engagementlocal self-governmentcivilian oversightjusticeconsolidationself-organizationcivic engagementСписок литературыBourdieu, P. (1993), Sociology of policy, Socio-Logos, Moscow, Russia.Cornwall, A. (2002), “Locating citizen participation”, DS Bulletin, Vol 33, No 2, 49-58, DOI: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2002.tb00016.xChernykh, E. A. (2012), The formation of the civil identity of youth under social uncertainty of Russian society: Author's abstract of Ph.D. thesis in sociological science: 22.00.04. Rostov-na-Donu, Russia.Davtyan, D. (2015) Implementation of civilian control in the practice of local self-government. Thesis for a Candidate Degree in sociology. 22.00.08. Belgorod, Russia.Dahl, R. A. (1992) “The Problems of Civic Competence”, Journal of Democracy, 3 (October), 45-59.Gaidukov, R. I. (2012), Integration of territorial public self-government in municipality: Thesis for a Candidate Degree in sociology: 22.00.08. Belgorod, Russia.Khripkov, K. A. (2018), “The analysis of communication aspect in the local self-organization system”, Theory and practice of social development, Iss. 11, https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2018.11.10 (in Russ.).Markvart, E., Savranskaja, O. L., Shugrina, E. S., Kokin, I. A. (2015), Report on research work on the theme “Improving the forms and mechanisms of participation of residents in local government”, Moscow, Russia.Petukhov, V. V. (2011), “Value palette of modern Russian society: ‘ideological porridge’ or search for new meanings?” The Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal, 1(101), January-February, 6-23 (in Russ.).