<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-932X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-932X</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413 /2408-932X-2014-1-2-78-84</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">160</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>RESEARCHES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>PHILOSOPHICAL AND METHODOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE  NATURAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES INTERACTION</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>PHILOSOPHICAL AND METHODOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE  NATURAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES INTERACTION</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Maltseva</surname><given-names>Natalia N.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Maltseva</surname><given-names>Natalia N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>maltseva@bsu.edu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Belgorod State National Research University</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/humanities/2014/2/Maltseva.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The purpose of the paper is to substantiate the renewed methodological aspects of interaction of natural sciences and humanities. The article has a philosophical and methodological nature and presents the analysis and synthesis of various aspects of the problem.
In the course of the study, the author identifies some theoretical and methodological aspects of the ways of interaction of natural sciences and humanities in terms of the analysis of modern approaches to the issue. The results of the study can be used in building methodological approaches to further convergence of natural sciences and humanities, and constructing a unified methodological basis of scientific knowledge.
The following methodological aspects of convergence of  natural sciences and humanities are presented as a conclusion of the study: occurrence in natural sciences approaches, that in principle cannot give definite answers because of complexity of the system, or lack of experimental data, which results in the fact that the role of the subjective factor in the interpretation of indirect observational data or in the analysis of theoretical constructs is more and more increasing; changing perceptions of the ideal in the modern scientific era, its focus not  on the search for the abstract truth, but for obtaining practical results;  the development of technology leads to the need of considering the axiological components during natural sciences experiments because they can threaten both life and health of individuals and the existence of  civilization as a whole;  the development of various system-related theories aimed at finding some universal laws, are manifested both in natural and social phenomena.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The purpose of the paper is to substantiate the renewed methodological aspects of interaction of natural sciences and humanities. The article has a philosophical and methodological nature and presents the analysis and synthesis of various aspects of the problem.
In the course of the study, the author identifies some theoretical and methodological aspects of the ways of interaction of natural sciences and humanities in terms of the analysis of modern approaches to the issue. The results of the study can be used in building methodological approaches to further convergence of natural sciences and humanities, and constructing a unified methodological basis of scientific knowledge.
The following methodological aspects of convergence of  natural sciences and humanities are presented as a conclusion of the study: occurrence in natural sciences approaches, that in principle cannot give definite answers because of complexity of the system, or lack of experimental data, which results in the fact that the role of the subjective factor in the interpretation of indirect observational data or in the analysis of theoretical constructs is more and more increasing; changing perceptions of the ideal in the modern scientific era, its focus not  on the search for the abstract truth, but for obtaining practical results;  the development of technology leads to the need of considering the axiological components during natural sciences experiments because they can threaten both life and health of individuals and the existence of  civilization as a whole;  the development of various system-related theories aimed at finding some universal laws, are manifested both in natural and social phenomena.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>methodology of humanities</kwd><kwd>systematic approach</kwd><kwd>evolution of scientific knowledge</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>methodology of humanities</kwd><kwd>systematic approach</kwd><kwd>evolution of scientific knowledge</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Ableev,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;R. Fundamental Philosophical Foundation of Human Cosmic Evolution: Essence, Origin and Historical Development. PhD&amp;nbsp;diss., presented as a Scientific Report. Tula, 2000. URL: http://www.agni3.narod.ru/Vvedenie.htm (date of access: June&amp;nbsp;11, 2014.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Ackoff,&amp;nbsp;R.&amp;nbsp;L. General Theory of Systems and Systems Research as Contrary Scientific Concepts of Systems. General Theory of Systems. Moscow, 1966. Pp.&amp;nbsp;60-80.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Bak,&amp;nbsp;D.&amp;nbsp;P., Kuznetsova,&amp;nbsp;N.&amp;nbsp;I. and Filatov,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;P. Interpretation Scope in Humanitarian and Natural Science Knowledge. Russian studies in philosophy. №&amp;nbsp;5 (1998). Pp.&amp;nbsp;144-150.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Beltseva,&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp;А. Humanitarian Knowledge and the Problem of Comprehension. Kirov: VSEI, 2005. 108&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Blauberg,&amp;nbsp;I.&amp;nbsp;V. and Yudin,&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp;G. Formation and Essence of the System Approach. Moscow: Nauka, 1973. 270&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Grechko,&amp;nbsp;P.&amp;nbsp;K. Social and Humanitarian Knowledge: Ontological Perspective. XI&amp;nbsp;International Conference &amp;ldquo;Logic, Methodology, Philosophy of Science&amp;rdquo;. Subpanel&amp;nbsp;10. Humanitarian Science Foundation. Moscow-Obninsk, 1995. Pp.&amp;nbsp;74-78.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Humanities as a Subject of Philosophic and Methodological Analysis (Papers of the Round Table). Russian studies in philosophy. №&amp;nbsp;6 (2007). Pp.&amp;nbsp;57-82.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Dobronravova,&amp;nbsp;I.&amp;nbsp;S. On Which Foundations is the Unity of Contemporary Science Realizable? Synergetic Paradigm. Diversity of Research and Approaches. Moscow: Progress &amp;ndash; Traditsiya, 2000. Pp.&amp;nbsp;6-10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Kedrov,&amp;nbsp;B.&amp;nbsp;M. Classification of Sciences. K.&amp;nbsp;Marx&amp;rsquo;s Prediction on the Science in the Future. Moscow: Mysl, 1985. 543&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Laszlo,&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp; Conceptual Foundations of Transdisciplinary Unified Theory. Synergetic Paradigm. Diversity of Research and Approaches. Moscow: Progress &amp;ndash; Traditsiya, 2000. Pp.&amp;nbsp;326-333.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Likhachev,&amp;nbsp;D.&amp;nbsp;S. and Samvelyan,&amp;nbsp;N. Return to Human. Inostrannaya literatura. №&amp;nbsp;1 (1988). Pp.&amp;nbsp;211-218.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Penkov,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;E. Methodological Peculiarities of Studying the Evolutionary Processes. BelSU Scientific Bulletin. Philosophy. Sociology. Law. №&amp;nbsp;8(48), Issue&amp;nbsp;4 (2008). Pp.&amp;nbsp;133-143.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Penkov,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;E. The Temporality of Evolutionary Processes and Methodological Features of Their Study. Proceedings of International Scientific Conference &amp;ldquo;Priorities in Development of Science, Technologies, and Engineering&amp;rdquo;. Italy (Rome), April&amp;nbsp;10-17, 2013. International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research. №&amp;nbsp;6 (2013). P.&amp;nbsp;47.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Oexle,&amp;nbsp;O.&amp;nbsp;G. Naturalism, Historicism and Modern Science Unanimity Issues. Theoretical Problems of Historical Studies. Research and Information Bulletin of the Centre for Theoretical Problems of History. Iss.&amp;nbsp;4. Moscow, 2002. Pp.&amp;nbsp;6-28.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>