<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-932X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-932X</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-932X-2019-5-1-0-4</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1622</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>RESEARCHES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>HER MAJESTY... FATE! POLEMIC OF F. PAKTOVSKY WITH INTERPRETATIONAL STEREOTYPES OF LITERARY AND CRITICAL CHEKHOVIANA OF 1880-1900</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>HER MAJESTY... FATE! POLEMIC OF F. PAKTOVSKY WITH INTERPRETATIONAL STEREOTYPES OF LITERARY AND CRITICAL CHEKHOVIANA OF 1880-1900</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Cherkasov</surname><given-names>Valery A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Cherkasov</surname><given-names>Valery A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>cherkasov@bsu.edu.ru</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Svetlana</surname><given-names>Petrova Vladimirovna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Svetlana</surname><given-names>Petrova Vladimirovna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>petrova@bsu.edu.ru</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/humanities/2019/1/1-2019-4_o6jAfPq.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>This paper presents a conceptual analysis of the essay by F.E.&amp;nbsp;Paktovsky dedicated to the works of A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov. The pertinence of this research stems from the significance of the literary figure for the history of Russian criticism of the XIX-XX centuries, the importance of his views on the works of the authors of Russian literature of the XIX-XX centuries, as well as for the history of Belgorod State National Research University, as long as the critic was one of the directors of Belgorod Teachers&amp;rsquo; Training Institute. The study of the creative heritage of F.E.&amp;nbsp;Paktovsky was carried out using motivational-figurative, biographical, historical and literary methods. Turning to the works of A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov, the literary scholar, considers his characters as &amp;quot;impotent, pitiful and ridiculous&amp;quot; people who are not capable of opposing their fate. He does not shift the blame from the person in his misfortunes, but calls to fight with them, calling for spiritual transformation. F.E.&amp;nbsp;Paktovsky was one of the first who tried to classify the characters of A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov, and this fact has cultural significance as evidence of a contemporary on the social composition of Russian society at the turn of the XIX-XX centuries.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This paper presents a conceptual analysis of the essay by F.E.&amp;nbsp;Paktovsky dedicated to the works of A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov. The pertinence of this research stems from the significance of the literary figure for the history of Russian criticism of the XIX-XX centuries, the importance of his views on the works of the authors of Russian literature of the XIX-XX centuries, as well as for the history of Belgorod State National Research University, as long as the critic was one of the directors of Belgorod Teachers&amp;rsquo; Training Institute. The study of the creative heritage of F.E.&amp;nbsp;Paktovsky was carried out using motivational-figurative, biographical, historical and literary methods. Turning to the works of A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov, the literary scholar, considers his characters as &amp;quot;impotent, pitiful and ridiculous&amp;quot; people who are not capable of opposing their fate. He does not shift the blame from the person in his misfortunes, but calls to fight with them, calling for spiritual transformation. F.E.&amp;nbsp;Paktovsky was one of the first who tried to classify the characters of A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov, and this fact has cultural significance as evidence of a contemporary on the social composition of Russian society at the turn of the XIX-XX centuries.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Fedor Paktovsky</kwd><kwd>Anton Chekhov</kwd><kwd>literary criticism</kwd><kwd>conceptual analysis</kwd><kwd>motivational-figurative method</kwd><kwd>biographical method</kwd><kwd>historical and literary</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Fedor Paktovsky</kwd><kwd>Anton Chekhov</kwd><kwd>literary criticism</kwd><kwd>conceptual analysis</kwd><kwd>motivational-figurative method</kwd><kwd>biographical method</kwd><kwd>historical and literary</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Averin,&amp;nbsp;B.V. (2002), &amp;ldquo;Comment on the article of N.K.&amp;nbsp;Mikhailovsky &amp;ldquo;Something about Mr. Chekhov&amp;rdquo;, in Sukhikh,&amp;nbsp;I.N. (ed), A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chexov: pro et contra [A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov: pro et contra], RKhGI, SPb., Russia, 1022-1024 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Bogdanovich,&amp;nbsp;A.I. (2002), &amp;ldquo;Critical notes&amp;rdquo;, in Sukhikh,&amp;nbsp;I.N. (ed), A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov: pro et contra [A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov: pro et contra], RKhGI, SPb., Russia, 231-240 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Volynskii,&amp;nbsp;A.L. (2002), &amp;ldquo;Literary notes. III-IV&amp;rdquo; in Sukhikh,&amp;nbsp;I.N. (ed), A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov: pro et contra [A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov: pro et contra], RKhGI, SPb., Russia, 216-229 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Gol&amp;#39;tsev,&amp;nbsp;V.A. (2002), &amp;ldquo;A.P. Chekhov. Experience of literary characteristics&amp;rdquo; in&amp;nbsp;Sukhikh,&amp;nbsp;I.N. (ed), A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov: pro et contra [A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov: pro et contra], RKhGI, SPb., Russia, 230-245 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Gor&amp;#39;kii,&amp;nbsp;M. (2002), &amp;ldquo;Literary notes. Regarding the new story by A.P. CheKhov &amp;quot;In the ravine&amp;rdquo; in&amp;nbsp;Sukhikh,&amp;nbsp;I.N. (ed), A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov: pro et contra [A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov: pro et contra], RKhGI, SPb., Russia, 327-331 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Ershova,&amp;nbsp;A.A. (2016), &amp;ldquo;Chekhov in the evaluation of Kazan criticism and literary criticism of the late XIX-early XX centuries&amp;rdquo;, Abstract of Ph.&amp;nbsp;D. dissertation, Kazan.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Kign, V.L. (Dedlov) (2002), &amp;ldquo;Conversations about literature&amp;rdquo; in&amp;nbsp;Sukhikh,&amp;nbsp;I.N. (ed), A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov: pro et contra [A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov: pro et contra], RKhGI, SPb., Russia, 93-111 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Krasnov,&amp;nbsp;P.N. (2002), &amp;ldquo;Autumn fiction writers. II. An.&amp;nbsp;P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov&amp;rdquo; in&amp;nbsp;Sukhikh,&amp;nbsp;I.N. (ed), A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov: pro et contra [A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov: pro et contra], RKhGI, SPb., Russia, 246-255 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Mikhailovskii,&amp;nbsp;N.K. &amp;ldquo;About fathers and children and about Mr. Chekhov&amp;rdquo; [Online], available at: http://dugward.ru/library/katalog_alfavit/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>mihaylovskiy_n_k.html (Accessed 21 January 2019).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Mikhailovskii,&amp;nbsp;N.K. (2002), &amp;ldquo;Something about Mr. Chekhov&amp;rdquo; in Sukhikh,&amp;nbsp;I.N. (ed), A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov: pro et contra [A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov: pro et contra], RKhGI, SPb., Russia, 332-354 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Moskovkin,&amp;nbsp;V.M. (2014), &amp;ldquo;Belgorod Teachers&amp;#39; Institute: directors, teachers and graduates&amp;rdquo;, Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities, 2(2), 29-41 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Murinya,&amp;nbsp;M.A. (1991), &amp;ldquo;A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov in Russian criticism and cultural consciousness of the early twentieth century (1900-1917)&amp;rdquo;, Abstract of Ph.&amp;nbsp;D. dissertation, SPb (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Paktovskii,&amp;nbsp;F.E. (1901), Modern society in the works of A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov, Kazan, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Pertsov,&amp;nbsp;P.P. (2002), &amp;ldquo;Flaws of creativity&amp;rdquo; in Sukhikh,&amp;nbsp;I.N. (ed), A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov: pro et contra [A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov: pro et contra], RKhGI, SPb., Russia, 180-215 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Skabichevskii,&amp;nbsp;A.M. (1891), The history of modern Russian literature (1848-1890), Pavlenkov, SPb, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Skabichevskii,&amp;nbsp;A.M. (1909), The history of modern Russian literature (1848-1908), Pavlenkov, SPb, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Solov&amp;#39;ev,&amp;nbsp;E.A. (2002), &amp;ldquo;Anton Pavlovich Chekhov&amp;rdquo; in Sukhikh,&amp;nbsp;I.N. (ed), A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov: pro et contra [A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov: pro et contra], RKhGI, SPb., Russia, 269-326 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Sukhikh,&amp;nbsp;I.N. (2002), &amp;ldquo;They said &amp;quot;E!&amp;quot;. Contemporaries read Chekhov&amp;rdquo; in Sukhikh,&amp;nbsp;I.N. (ed), A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov: pro et contra [A.P.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov: pro et contra], RKhGI, SPb., Russia, 7-44 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Cherkasov,&amp;nbsp;V.A., Petrova,&amp;nbsp;S.V. (2018), &amp;ldquo;Honest character and pure poetic gift&amp;rdquo;: A.K.&amp;nbsp;Tolstoy in the coverage of F.E.&amp;nbsp;Paktovsky&amp;rdquo;, Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities, 4(1), 20-25 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Chekhov,&amp;nbsp;A.P. Complete works and letters in 30 volumes. Works in 18 volumes, Nauka, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Chudakov,&amp;nbsp;A.P. (1971), The poetics of Chekhov, Nauka, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Baceeicz,&amp;nbsp;F. (2013), &amp;ldquo;Pragmatics of asemantic remarks in A.&amp;nbsp;Chekhov&amp;#39;s plays&amp;rdquo;, Slavia Orientalis, 62(4), 543-556.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Bidney,&amp;nbsp;M. (2010), &amp;ldquo;Bright blur, blinding light, blank page: The epistemically skeptical epiphanies of Chekhov&amp;rdquo;, Slavic and East European Journal, 54 (2), 272-296.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Brooks,&amp;nbsp;J.B.S. (2018), &amp;ldquo;Doctors as writers and patients: Manuscripts don&amp;#39;t burn, Chekhov and phthisis&amp;rdquo;, British Journal of General Practice, 68(674), 429.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Clayton,&amp;nbsp;J.D. (2012), &amp;ldquo;Diagnosis and balagan: The poetics of Chekhov&amp;#39;s Drama&amp;rdquo;, in Clayton,&amp;nbsp;J.D., Meerzon,&amp;nbsp;Ya. (ed.), Adapting Chekhov: The Text and its Mutations, Routledge, London, 17-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Fen,&amp;nbsp;E. (1960), &amp;ldquo;Chekhov the physician born January 17, 1860&amp;rdquo;, British medical journal, 1 (5167), 192-193.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Mathiasen,&amp;nbsp;H. (2005), &amp;ldquo;The two cultures in Chekhov&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;The Butterfly&amp;#39;&amp;rdquo;, American Journal of Medicine, 118 (10), 1179.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>McV,&amp;nbsp;G. (1975 ), &amp;ldquo;Anton Chekhov. A Critical Study. By William Gerhardie. Preface by Michael Holroyd. London: Macdonald. 1974 172 pp. &amp;pound;2.95&amp;rdquo;, Journal of European Studies, 5 (4), 383.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>Popkin,&amp;nbsp;C. (2015), &amp;ldquo;The number devil and the mermaid of math: Chekhov&amp;rsquo;s &amp;#39;Ward six&amp;#39;&amp;rdquo;, in Kopper,&amp;nbsp;J. Wachtel,&amp;nbsp;M. (ed,), A Convenient Territory: Russian Literature at the Edge of Modernity: Essays in Honor of Barry Scherr, Slavica, Bloomington, Indiana, 305-318.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>Turner,&amp;nbsp;M. (2013), &amp;ldquo;The Chekhovian point of view in Virginia Woolf&amp;#39;s to the Lighthouse&amp;rdquo;, Modern Language Quarterly, 74 (3), 391-412.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>Urban,&amp;nbsp;D.V. (2013), &amp;ldquo;Gaev&amp;#39;s Asperger&amp;#39;s syndrome in Chekhov&amp;#39;s the cherry orchard: A diagnosis and a call for character reassessment&amp;rdquo;, Australian Slavonic and East European Studies, 27 (1-2), 35-60.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><mixed-citation>Whyman,&amp;nbsp;R. (2010), Anton Chekhov (Routledge modern and contemporary dramatists), Routledge, New York, NY.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>