<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-932X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-932X</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-932X-2019-5-4-0-1</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1866</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>RESEARCHES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>SOCIETY: OPERATIONAL DEFINITION AND EPISTEMIC GENESIS</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>SOCIETY: OPERATIONAL DEFINITION AND EPISTEMIC GENESIS</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Koprivitsa</surname><given-names>Chaslav D.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Koprivitsa</surname><given-names>Chaslav D.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>caslav.koprivica@fpn.bg.ac.rs</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/humanities/2019/4/Т.5_4_2019_1.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>In this article, we draw a conceptual distinction between the concept of society, connecting it primarily with special interests and the corresponding type of interaction. In the narrow sense, we can talk about socialization where there is an experience of depersonalization of interpersonal interaction, as if it were not based on personal&amp;nbsp;&amp;ndash; either individual or collective actors&amp;nbsp;&amp;ndash; but apersonal &amp;quot;forces&amp;quot;. In this case, the totality of all the interests of the charged forces should build a singular social field, that is, concentrate in it. The society, in the T&amp;ouml;nniesean sense, was born with the emergence of disagreements on basic normative questions, which are up to this point, in general, were &amp;ldquo;solved&amp;rdquo; through an unproductive and undeniable consensus on a joint &amp;quot;truth&amp;quot; that binds and obligates all its representatives. The separation of the public from the private is the accompanying effect of the dissociation of community, which also manifests itself as individualism&amp;nbsp;&amp;ndash; firstly as the way of life, and then as ideology. This initial separation of individuals and groups in relation to their interests also gives rise to a divergence of their respective worldviews. The existence of a permanent disagreement regarding socially significant issues is becoming typical of the social situation.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In this article, we draw a conceptual distinction between the concept of society, connecting it primarily with special interests and the corresponding type of interaction. In the narrow sense, we can talk about socialization where there is an experience of depersonalization of interpersonal interaction, as if it were not based on personal&amp;nbsp;&amp;ndash; either individual or collective actors&amp;nbsp;&amp;ndash; but apersonal &amp;quot;forces&amp;quot;. In this case, the totality of all the interests of the charged forces should build a singular social field, that is, concentrate in it. The society, in the T&amp;ouml;nniesean sense, was born with the emergence of disagreements on basic normative questions, which are up to this point, in general, were &amp;ldquo;solved&amp;rdquo; through an unproductive and undeniable consensus on a joint &amp;quot;truth&amp;quot; that binds and obligates all its representatives. The separation of the public from the private is the accompanying effect of the dissociation of community, which also manifests itself as individualism&amp;nbsp;&amp;ndash; firstly as the way of life, and then as ideology. This initial separation of individuals and groups in relation to their interests also gives rise to a divergence of their respective worldviews. The existence of a permanent disagreement regarding socially significant issues is becoming typical of the social situation.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>society</kwd><kwd>community</kwd><kwd>social ontology</kwd><kwd>Tönnies</kwd><kwd>Simmel</kwd><kwd>modernity</kwd><kwd>crisis</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>society</kwd><kwd>community</kwd><kwd>social ontology</kwd><kwd>Tönnies</kwd><kwd>Simmel</kwd><kwd>modernity</kwd><kwd>crisis</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Actes du Symposium international &amp;bdquo;Ruđer Bo&amp;scaron;ković&amp;ldquo; (1959), Acad&amp;eacute;mie Serbe des Sciences, Beograd etc.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Gehlen Arnold (2016), Urmensch und Sp&amp;auml;tkultur [Prehistoric man and late culture], hrsg. von Karl-Siegbert Rehberg, Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt/М, Germany (in Germ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Husserl Edmund (1994), Collected Works, Vol. I, The Phenomenology of Internal Consciousness of Time, translation by V.&amp;nbsp;Molchanov, Gnosis, Moscow, Russia (in Rus.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Koprivitsa,&amp;nbsp;Chaslav&amp;nbsp;D. (2019), &amp;laquo;Syndrome of identity of deep borderland. Applications for understanding the outskirts&amp;raquo;, Journal of Frontier Studies, 4/2, 257-295 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Koselleck Reinhart (1995), Vergangene Zukunft. Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten [Past future. On the Semantics of Historical Times], Schurkamp, Frankfurt/M, Germany (in Germ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Mitrovic,&amp;nbsp;Jeremiah D. (1992), Srpstvo Dubrovnika [Serbian Dubrovnik], Srpska književna zadruga, Belgrade (in Serb.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Nietzsche Friedrich (1972), Nachgelassene Fragmente Anfang 1888 bis Anfang Januar 1889, Kritische Gesamtausgabe Band VIII, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin &amp;ndash; New York (in Germ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Ritchie Katherine (2015), &amp;ldquo;The Metaphysics of Social Groups&amp;rdquo;, Philosophy Compass, 10 (5), 310-321.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Simmel Georg (1892), Die Probleme der Geschichtsphilosophie: Eine erkenntnistheoretische Studie,&amp;nbsp;Duncker &amp;amp; Humblot, Leipzig, Germany (in Germ.). [Online] URL: http://socio.ch/sim/geschichtsphilosophie/index.htm (Accessed: 20.11.2019)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Simmel Georg (1908), Soziologie. Untersuchungen &amp;uuml;ber die Formen der Vergesellschaftung, Duncker &amp;amp; Humblot, Leipzig, Germany (in Germ.). [Online] URL: http://socio.ch/sim/soziologie/index.htm (Accessed: 20.11.2019)</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>