<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-932X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-932X</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-932X-2016-2-1-46-52</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">216</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>RESEARCHES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS OF SOCIAL AND HUMAN COGNITION</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS OF SOCIAL AND HUMAN COGNITION</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Izotov</surname><given-names>Mukhtar Зиядаевич</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Izotov</surname><given-names>Mukhtar</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>izotov.m@mail.ru</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Turyszhanova</surname><given-names>Roza Кималхановна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Turyszhanova</surname><given-names>Roza</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>turyszhanova.roza@mail.ru</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/humanities/2016/1/Izotov_Turyszhanova.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The given article goes for the demarcation idea of social and intrascientific (cognitive) values. It is noted that the important component of social development is the world of things, which is created by the human in the process of writing and included into the social existence context.
At the same time, as the world is humanized, a human as a social being is usually included in the object of social cognition. As a result, the knower and the object of social cognition exist one inside the other. Therefore, there is an unbreakable bond of social cognition with values and worldview constituents. The issue of human cognition is to reveal and form the rationale for the meaning of existence and its value.
In a way of writing the article, the authors used the activity and axiological (value) approaches as a whole. The general scientific methods of hermeneutical, system and synergic analysis were also applied. The principles for the unity of scientific theory and practice, and the integration of social and human and natural sciences were principal for the given work.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The given article goes for the demarcation idea of social and intrascientific (cognitive) values. It is noted that the important component of social development is the world of things, which is created by the human in the process of writing and included into the social existence context.
At the same time, as the world is humanized, a human as a social being is usually included in the object of social cognition. As a result, the knower and the object of social cognition exist one inside the other. Therefore, there is an unbreakable bond of social cognition with values and worldview constituents. The issue of human cognition is to reveal and form the rationale for the meaning of existence and its value.
In a way of writing the article, the authors used the activity and axiological (value) approaches as a whole. The general scientific methods of hermeneutical, system and synergic analysis were also applied. The principles for the unity of scientific theory and practice, and the integration of social and human and natural sciences were principal for the given work.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>social cognition</kwd><kwd>human cognition</kwd><kwd>an object</kwd><kwd>a knower</kwd><kwd>a humanization</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>social cognition</kwd><kwd>human cognition</kwd><kwd>an object</kwd><kwd>a knower</kwd><kwd>a humanization</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Agazzi,&amp;nbsp;E. Responsibility: the Genuine Ground for the Regulation of a Free Science. Voprosy filosofii. No.&amp;nbsp;1 (1992). Pp.&amp;nbsp;30-40.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Global Problems and Social Values. Moscow: Progress, 1990. 496&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Kant,&amp;nbsp;I. Critique of Pure Reason. Works: In 6 Volumes. Vol.&amp;nbsp;3. Moscow: Mysl&amp;rsquo;. 1964. 799&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Kant,&amp;nbsp;I. Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals. Works: In 6 Volumes. Vol.&amp;nbsp;4. Part&amp;nbsp;1. Moscow: Mysl&amp;rsquo;. 1964.Pp.&amp;nbsp;219-310.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Kuhn,&amp;nbsp;T.&amp;nbsp;S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Boston. 1975.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Lacey,&amp;nbsp;H. Is Science Value Free? : Values and Scientific Understanding. Moscow: Logos. 2001. 359&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Laudan,&amp;nbsp;L. Science and Values. Modern Science Philosophy. Moscow: Logos. 1996. Pp.&amp;nbsp;295-342.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Methods of Scientific Knowledge. Almaty: Gylym. 1997. 160&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Modern Philosophical Problems of Natural, Engineering and Social Sciences and Humanities. Moscow: Gardariki, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Polanyi,&amp;nbsp;M. Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Moscow: Progress. 1985. 344&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Popper,&amp;nbsp;K Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. L.: Oxford University Press. 1983.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Fromm,&amp;nbsp;E. To Have or Be? Moscow: Progress, 1986. 238&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>