<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-932X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-932X</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-932X-2016-2-1-60-65</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">218</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>RESEARCHES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>EURASIAN INFORMATION SPACE: UNIFICATION OR COORDINATION?</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>EURASIAN INFORMATION SPACE: UNIFICATION OR COORDINATION?</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Venidziktau</surname><given-names>Siarhei V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Venidziktau</surname><given-names>Siarhei V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>venidiktov4444@gmail.com</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/humanities/2016/1/Venidiktov.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The article deals with the problem of choosing the strategy of information exchange within the Eurasian Economic Union: the possibility of national information systems unification or coordination of activities in the EAEU countries’ media structures. The author consistently analyzes the contradictions in the media sphere of Belarus, Russia, Armenia, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. It is affirmed that in addition to the lack of direct legislative control, the integration of media systems is complicated by the heterogeneity and contradictory development of the media market in EAEU countries, the differences in the common models of mass information and in a heterogeneous audience requests.
It was concluded that at the stage of the integration process in the EAEU the question of information space unification is not a priority. Directions for EAEU countries’ media coordination include: the development of a legal framework for information integration; the introduction of integration topic to the media discourse of the EAEU subjects; the creation of the interstate media structures; the development of a common approach to public media; the identification of forms and methods of interaction between the media without creating interstate structures; the use of online media potential.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article deals with the problem of choosing the strategy of information exchange within the Eurasian Economic Union: the possibility of national information systems unification or coordination of activities in the EAEU countries’ media structures. The author consistently analyzes the contradictions in the media sphere of Belarus, Russia, Armenia, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. It is affirmed that in addition to the lack of direct legislative control, the integration of media systems is complicated by the heterogeneity and contradictory development of the media market in EAEU countries, the differences in the common models of mass information and in a heterogeneous audience requests.
It was concluded that at the stage of the integration process in the EAEU the question of information space unification is not a priority. Directions for EAEU countries’ media coordination include: the development of a legal framework for information integration; the introduction of integration topic to the media discourse of the EAEU subjects; the creation of the interstate media structures; the development of a common approach to public media; the identification of forms and methods of interaction between the media without creating interstate structures; the use of online media potential.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Eurasian Economic Union</kwd><kwd>the media</kwd><kwd>media sphere</kwd><kwd>integration</kwd><kwd>information space</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Eurasian Economic Union</kwd><kwd>the media</kwd><kwd>media sphere</kwd><kwd>integration</kwd><kwd>information space</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Vartanova,&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp;L. The Post-Soviet Transformation of the Russian Media and Journalism. Moscow: MediaMir, 2014. 280&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>The History of Information Market Development in Kazakhstan. Media law. [Online] URL: http://medialaw.asia/node/9139 (date of access: February&amp;nbsp;7, 2016).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Mambetaliev,&amp;nbsp;K. The Status of the Media in Kyrgyzstan. The project &amp;laquo;Defense of democratic principles of freedom of speech in Central Asia&amp;raquo;. [Online] URL: http://www.monitoring.kg/?pid=10 (date of access: January&amp;nbsp;5, 2016).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Mediasphere of Belarus. Sociological Aspect. Ed. by V.O.&amp;nbsp;Dashkevich. Minsk: Information and Analytical Centre of the Presidential Administration, 2014. 98&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Ryabova,&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp;L. and Kolesnikova,&amp;nbsp;N.&amp;nbsp;A. The Role of the Media in the Formation of Civil Society in Russia. Etnosotsium. No.&amp;nbsp;12(78) (2014). Pp.&amp;nbsp;19-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Satylkanova,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;R. Legal Basis of Public Television in the Kyrgyz Republic. KRSU Bulletin. Vol.&amp;nbsp;15. No.&amp;nbsp;2 (2015). Pp.&amp;nbsp;142-144.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Anikina,&amp;nbsp;M. Journalists in Russia. Journalism in Russia, Poland and Sweden &amp;ndash; Traditions, Cultures and Research. Journalistik, Institutionen f&amp;ouml;r kommunikation, medier och IT, 2012. Pp.&amp;nbsp;13-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Gross,&amp;nbsp;P. Between Reality and Dream: Eastern European Media Transition, Transformation, Consolidation and Integration. East European Politics and Societies. No.&amp;nbsp;18(1) (2004). Pp.&amp;nbsp;110-131.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Hallin,&amp;nbsp;D. and Mancini,&amp;nbsp;P. Comparing Media Systems. Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,&amp;nbsp;2004. 342&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>2015 World Press Freedom Index. Reporters without borders. [Online] URL: http://index.rsf.org/#!/ (date of access: January&amp;nbsp;4, 2016).</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>