<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-932X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-932X</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-932X-2020-6-4-0-6</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2253</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>RESEARCHES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Chelpanov&amp;#39;s concept of psychological time in the context of interdisciplinary studies&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Chelpanov&amp;#39;s concept of psychological time in the context of interdisciplinary studies&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Savintsev</surname><given-names>Vyacheslav I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Savintsev</surname><given-names>Vyacheslav I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>savincev@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/humanities/2020/4/Т.6_4_2020-6.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The article analyzes the concept of psychological time of the philosopher and psychologist Georgy Chelpanov. The innovation of the study is presented, firstly, in the interpretation of the Chelpanov&amp;rsquo;s ideas about the perception of a sequence of images over time; secondly, in the analysis of the properties of psychological time in the context of the modern epistemological approach. In the research there were used the following methodological tools: hermeneutic and comparativistic analysis, the experience of philosophical reconstruction. The study revealed that Chelpanov distinguished two types of time: psychological and mathematical. The first type is realized as the ability to conceive the duration of &amp;quot;images&amp;quot;. Mathematical time is an artificial logic-symbolic tool necessary for distracting and fixing information flows. The present, according to Chelpanov, is not a &amp;quot;moment&amp;quot; and not a certain &amp;quot;now,&amp;quot; but a time atom containing a minimum of images. Finally, it was found out that the nature of time perception is determined by the bodily and mental organization of a person. Chelpanov presents hypothetical descriptions, correlating human bodily reactions with insects, as well as allowing situations of increasing or decreasing the lifetime of the human body.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article analyzes the concept of psychological time of the philosopher and psychologist Georgy Chelpanov. The innovation of the study is presented, firstly, in the interpretation of the Chelpanov&amp;rsquo;s ideas about the perception of a sequence of images over time; secondly, in the analysis of the properties of psychological time in the context of the modern epistemological approach. In the research there were used the following methodological tools: hermeneutic and comparativistic analysis, the experience of philosophical reconstruction. The study revealed that Chelpanov distinguished two types of time: psychological and mathematical. The first type is realized as the ability to conceive the duration of &amp;quot;images&amp;quot;. Mathematical time is an artificial logic-symbolic tool necessary for distracting and fixing information flows. The present, according to Chelpanov, is not a &amp;quot;moment&amp;quot; and not a certain &amp;quot;now,&amp;quot; but a time atom containing a minimum of images. Finally, it was found out that the nature of time perception is determined by the bodily and mental organization of a person. Chelpanov presents hypothetical descriptions, correlating human bodily reactions with insects, as well as allowing situations of increasing or decreasing the lifetime of the human body.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Georgy Chelpanov</kwd><kwd>Russian philosophy</kwd><kwd>time</kwd><kwd>space</kwd><kwd>consciousness</kwd><kwd>image</kwd><kwd>empirical parallelism</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Georgy Chelpanov</kwd><kwd>Russian philosophy</kwd><kwd>time</kwd><kwd>space</kwd><kwd>consciousness</kwd><kwd>image</kwd><kwd>empirical parallelism</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Chelpanov,&amp;nbsp;G.&amp;nbsp;I. (1893), &amp;ldquo;About the nature of time&amp;rdquo;, Voprosy filosofii i psikhologii [Questions of philosophy and psychology], 19 (4), 36-54 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Chelpanov,&amp;nbsp;G.&amp;nbsp;I. (1912), Mozg i dusha [The brain and the soul], Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Dlugach,&amp;nbsp;T.&amp;nbsp;B. (2018), &amp;ldquo;Florensky and Kant: man in space and time&amp;rdquo;, Istoriko-filosofskiy ezhegodnik [History of Philosophy Yearbook], 33, 242-266 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Gaydenko,&amp;nbsp;P.&amp;nbsp;P. (2006), Vremya. Dlitelnost. Vechnost. Problema vremeni v evropeyskoy filosofii i nauke [Time. Duration. Eternity. The problem of time in European philosophy and science], Progress-Traditsiya, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Knyazeva,&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp;N. (2014), &amp;ldquo;Evolutionary epistemology in the face of interdisciplinary challenges of modern science&amp;rdquo;, Philosophy of science. Epistemology in interdisciplinary research, 19, 125-144 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Knyazeva,&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp;N. (2018), &amp;ldquo;The knowing body and the moving mind: a conceptual turn in epistemology&amp;rdquo;, Epistemologiya segodnya. Idei, problemy, diskussii: monografiya [Epistemology today. Ideas, problems, discussions: monograph], in Kasavin,&amp;nbsp;I.&amp;nbsp;T., Voronina,&amp;nbsp;N.&amp;nbsp;N. (ed.), NGU of N.&amp;nbsp;I.&amp;nbsp;Lobachevskiy, N.&amp;nbsp;Novgorod, Russia, 339-350 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>