<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-932X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-932X</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-932X-2021-7-3-0-1</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2536</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>RESEARCHES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;God as a subject of the pre-Cartesian era&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;God as a subject of the pre-Cartesian era&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>. Maltsev</surname><given-names>Yaroslav V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>. Maltsev</surname><given-names>Yaroslav V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>maltsevyaroslav@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Tyumen State University</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/humanities/2021/3/01_Т.7_3_2021.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The purpose of this article is to advance and substantiate the thesis that the concept of God in the pre-Cartesian era was a peculiar way of reflecting their own subjectivity by humanity at a time when people were not yet ready to take existential responsibility on themselves (the subject speaks about themselves, but not from themselves, or from themselves, but not about themselves, as J.&amp;nbsp;Lacan put it). To achieve the goal, the author bases on the ideas and methodology of A.V. Pavlov (polyfocality, ego-subjectivity of modernity), J.&amp;nbsp;Lacan (structural psychoanalysis), M.&amp;nbsp;Foucault (micro-power and practice of oneself). A number of literary and biblical texts were used to write the work.

In the course of the work, attention was paid to such features of the subject as: pragmatism, rationality, liberalism, morality, creativity, voluntarism and deviance.

As a result, it is concluded that the presence of the concept of &amp;laquo;God&amp;raquo;, its gradual development, traced from the book of Genesis to the New Testament, shows the evolution of the reflection of mankind over its own subjectivity. Furthermore, it illustrates that the characteristics of the subject are invariable and do not depend on the historical epoch, do not have a link to space-time, which allows us to speak of the permanent nature of both the subject and the associated being-with-time-modernity.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The purpose of this article is to advance and substantiate the thesis that the concept of God in the pre-Cartesian era was a peculiar way of reflecting their own subjectivity by humanity at a time when people were not yet ready to take existential responsibility on themselves (the subject speaks about themselves, but not from themselves, or from themselves, but not about themselves, as J.&amp;nbsp;Lacan put it). To achieve the goal, the author bases on the ideas and methodology of A.V. Pavlov (polyfocality, ego-subjectivity of modernity), J.&amp;nbsp;Lacan (structural psychoanalysis), M.&amp;nbsp;Foucault (micro-power and practice of oneself). A number of literary and biblical texts were used to write the work.

In the course of the work, attention was paid to such features of the subject as: pragmatism, rationality, liberalism, morality, creativity, voluntarism and deviance.

As a result, it is concluded that the presence of the concept of &amp;laquo;God&amp;raquo;, its gradual development, traced from the book of Genesis to the New Testament, shows the evolution of the reflection of mankind over its own subjectivity. Furthermore, it illustrates that the characteristics of the subject are invariable and do not depend on the historical epoch, do not have a link to space-time, which allows us to speak of the permanent nature of both the subject and the associated being-with-time-modernity.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>modernity</kwd><kwd>permanent modernity</kwd><kwd>subjectivity</kwd><kwd>Cartesianism</kwd><kwd>God</kwd><kwd>practices of oneself</kwd><kwd>philosophy of culture</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>modernity</kwd><kwd>permanent modernity</kwd><kwd>subjectivity</kwd><kwd>Cartesianism</kwd><kwd>God</kwd><kwd>practices of oneself</kwd><kwd>philosophy of culture</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Althusser,&amp;nbsp;L. (2014), On the Reproduction of Capitalism. Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses, VERSO, London&amp;ndash;New-York, England.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Augustine the Blessed (2000), &amp;ldquo;Against academics&amp;rdquo;, Tvoreniya: v 4 t. T. 1: Ob istinnoj religii [Creations: In 4 vols. Vol.&amp;nbsp;1: About the True Religion], Aleteya, UCIMM-Press, St. Petersburg, Kiev, Russia, Ukraine (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Badiou,&amp;nbsp;A. (2003), Manifest filosofii [Manifesto of Philosophy], Machina, St. Petersburg, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Baudrillard,&amp;nbsp;J. (1987), &amp;ldquo;Modernity&amp;rdquo;, Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory, 3 (XI), 63-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Borisov,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;V. (2013), &amp;ldquo;What it means to be modern (in the context of the article by A.V.&amp;nbsp;Pavlov &amp;quot;Notes on modernity and subjectivity&amp;quot;)&amp;rdquo;, SOCIUM and POWER, 3, 123-126 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Chuprov,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;S. (2013), &amp;ldquo;The modernity of the postmodernist, or &amp;lsquo;Nowhere to run&amp;rsquo;&amp;rdquo;, SOCIUM and POWER, 2, 129-131 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Descartes,&amp;nbsp;R. (1989), &amp;ldquo;The origin of philosophy&amp;rdquo;, Sochineniya: v 2 t. T.&amp;nbsp;1 [Essays: in 2 vols. V.&amp;nbsp;1], Mysl&amp;#39;, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Eco,&amp;nbsp;U. (2007), Rol&amp;#39; chitatelya. Issledovaniya po semiotike teksta [The role of the reader. Research on the semiotics of the text], Simpozium, St. Petersburg, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Eco,&amp;nbsp;U. (2003), Shest&amp;#39; progulok v literaturnykh lesakh [Six walks in the literary forests], Simpozium, St. Petersburg, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Eco,&amp;nbsp;U. (2018), Superman dlja mass. Ritorika i ideologija narodnogo romana [Superman for the masses. The rhetoric and ideology of the folk novel], Slovo/Slovo, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Eco,&amp;nbsp;U., Martini,&amp;nbsp;C. M. (2014), Dialog o vere i neverii [Dialogue about faith and unbelief], Biblejsko-bogoslovskij institut sv. apostola Andreya, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Ershov,&amp;nbsp;Yu.&amp;nbsp;G. (2013), &amp;ldquo;Modernity as a problem&amp;rdquo;, SOCIUM and POWER, 5, 131-136 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Foucault,&amp;nbsp;M. (1999), Nadzirat&amp;#39; i nakazyvat&amp;#39;: rozhdenie tyur&amp;#39;my [Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison], Ad Marginem, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Freud,&amp;nbsp;S. (2006), &amp;ldquo;Beyond the pleasure principle&amp;rdquo;, Psikhologija bessoznatel&amp;#39;nogo [Psychology of the unconscious], Firma STD, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Habermas,&amp;nbsp;J. (2008), Filosofskij diskurs o moderne. Dvenadtsat&amp;#39; lektsij [Philosophical discourse on Modernity. Twelve lectures], Ves&amp;#39; Mir, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Habermas,&amp;nbsp;J. (2001), Moral&amp;#39;noe soznanie i kommunikativnoe dejstvie [Moral consciousness and communicative action], Nauka, St. Petersburg, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Hassan,&amp;nbsp;I. (2003), &amp;ldquo;Beyond Postmodernism: Toward an Aesthetic of Trust&amp;rdquo;, Modern Greek Studies (Australia and New Zealand), 11, 303-316.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Hegel,&amp;nbsp;G.&amp;nbsp;W.&amp;nbsp;F. (1990), Filosofija prava [Philosophy of law], Mysl&amp;#39;, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Hutcheson,&amp;nbsp;L. (2002), The Politics of Postmodernism, Routledge, New York; London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Kant,&amp;nbsp;I. (1994), &amp;ldquo;Critique of pure Reason&amp;rdquo;, Sochineniya: v 8 t. T.&amp;nbsp;3 [Essays: in 8 vols. Vol.&amp;nbsp;3], Choro, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Kapustin,&amp;nbsp;B.&amp;nbsp;G. (1998), Sovremennost&amp;#39; kak predmet politicheskoj teorii [Modernity as a subject of political theory], ROSSPEN, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Kimelev,&amp;nbsp;Yu.&amp;nbsp;A. (2006), &amp;ldquo;Sub&amp;#39;ekt&amp;rdquo; i &amp;ldquo;sub&amp;#39;ektivnost&amp;#39;&amp;rdquo; v sovremennoj zapadnoj sotsial&amp;#39;noj filosofii: nauchno-analiticheskij obzor [&amp;ldquo;Subject&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;subjectivity&amp;rdquo; in Modern Western Social Philosophy: a scientific and analytical review], RAN; INION; Tsentr gumanitarnykh nauchno-informatsionnykh. issledovaniy, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Kirby,&amp;nbsp;А. (2006), &amp;ldquo;The death of postmodernism and beyond&amp;rdquo;, Philosophy now: A magazine of ideas, 58, 34-37.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Kurennoy,&amp;nbsp;V. (2009), Filosofiya fil&amp;#39;ma: uprazhneniya v analize [The philosophy of the film: exercises in analysis], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Lakan,&amp;nbsp;J. (1997), Instantsiya bukvy v bessoznatel&amp;#39;nom, ili sud&amp;#39;ba razuma posle Frejda [The instance of the letter in the unconscious, or the fate of the mind after Freud], Logos, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Lakan,&amp;nbsp;J. (1995), Funkciya i pole rechi i yazyka v psihoanalize [Function and field of speech and language in psychoanalysis], Gnosis Publishing House, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Lektorsky,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;A. (2010), &amp;ldquo;Subject&amp;rdquo;, Novaja filosofskaja Entsiklopedija: v 4 t. T.&amp;nbsp;3 [The New Philosophical Encyclopedia: in 4 vols. V.&amp;nbsp;3.], 659-660 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Lektorsky,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;A. (1980), Sub&amp;#39;ekt. Ob&amp;#39;ekt. Poznanie [Subject. Object. Cognition], Nauka, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Lektorsky,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;A. (2001), Jepistemologija klassicheskaja i neklassicheskaja [Classical and non-classical epistemology], Editorial URSS, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>Lyubutin,&amp;nbsp;K.&amp;nbsp;N., Pivovarov,&amp;nbsp;D.&amp;nbsp;V. (1993), Dialektika sub&amp;#39;ekta i ob&amp;#39;ekta [Dialectics of subject and object], UrGU Publishing House, Ekaterinburg, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>Maurois,&amp;nbsp;A. (1983), Nadezhdy i vospominanija [Hopes and memories], Progress, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>Pavlov,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;V. (2017), Filosofija sovremennosti i mezhvremen&amp;#39;ja [Philosophy of modernity and inter-time], Titul Publishing House, Tjumen&amp;#39;, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><mixed-citation>Pavlov,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;V. (2013), &amp;ldquo;The Polyphocal Sociology of Modernity&amp;rdquo;, SOCIUM and POWER, 4, 5-13 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><mixed-citation>Pavlov,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;V. (2019), &amp;ldquo;Images of modernity in the XXI century: hypermodernism&amp;rdquo;, Filosofskiy zhurnal, 2 (12), 20-33 (in Russ.) (a).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><mixed-citation>Pavlov,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;V. (2018), &amp;ldquo;Images of modernity in the XXI century: metamodernism&amp;rdquo;, Logos, 6, 1-16 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><mixed-citation>Pavlov,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;V. (2019), &amp;ldquo;Obrazy sovremennosti v XXI veke: sverhmodernizm&amp;rdquo;, Filosofiya i sovremennost&amp;#39;, 1, 69-83 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><mixed-citation>Pavlov,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;V. (2013), &amp;ldquo;Notes on modernity and subjectivity. Criteria of modernity&amp;rdquo;, SOCIUM and POWER, 1, 5-14 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><mixed-citation>Pavlov,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;V. (2012), &amp;ldquo;Notes on modernity and subjectivity. Modernity and plasticity&amp;rdquo;, SOCIUM and POWER, 6, 5-11 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><mixed-citation>Polovinkina,&amp;nbsp;O.&amp;nbsp;I. (2014), &amp;ldquo;Understanding of the &amp;quot;Modern&amp;quot; (Modern) in the Victorian Aesthetic Criticism&amp;rdquo;, Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Rossijskaya i zarubezhnaya filologiya, 4 (28), 131-139 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><mixed-citation>Sartre,&amp;nbsp;J.-P. (2000), Bytie i nichto: Opyt fenomenologicheskoj ontologii [Being and nothing: The experience of phenomenological ontology], Respublika, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><mixed-citation>Sartr,&amp;nbsp;J.-P. (1990), &amp;ldquo;Existentialism is humanism&amp;rdquo;, Sumerki bogov [Twilight of the Gods], Politizdat, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><mixed-citation>Titus,&amp;nbsp;L.&amp;nbsp;K. (1983), O prirode veshhey [About the nature of things], Hudozhestvennaya literatura, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><mixed-citation>Tul&amp;#39;chinsky,&amp;nbsp;G.&amp;nbsp;L. (2013), &amp;ldquo;Modernity and subjectivity&amp;rdquo;, SOCIUM and POWER, 3, 116-122 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><mixed-citation>Varga,&amp;nbsp;I. (2005), &amp;ldquo;The Body&amp;nbsp;&amp;ndash; The New Sacred? The Body in Hypermodernity&amp;rdquo;, Current Sociology, 53 (2), 211-212.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><mixed-citation>Žižek,&amp;nbsp;S. (2005), &amp;ldquo;The Matrix, or Two sides of perversion&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;Matrica&amp;rdquo; kak filosofiya: Esse [&amp;ldquo;The Matrix&amp;rdquo; as philosophy: An Essay], U-Faktoriya, Ekaterinburg, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><mixed-citation>Žižek,&amp;nbsp;S., Milbank,&amp;nbsp;J. (2020), Monstruoznost&amp;#39; Hrista [The Monstrousness of Christ], RIPOL klassik, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><mixed-citation>Žižek,&amp;nbsp;S. (2014), Chuma fantaziy [The Plague of fantasies], Humanitarian Center Publishing House, Kharkiv, Ukrain (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><mixed-citation>Žižek,&amp;nbsp;S. (2014), Schekotlivyj sub&amp;#39;ekt: otsutstvuyushhiy tsentr politicheskoy ontologii [A sensitive subject: an absent center of political ontology], Delo Publishing House, RANHiGS, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>