<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-932X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-932X</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-932X-2021-7-4-0-2</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2559</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>RESEARCHES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Phenomenology discovers America: phenomenology&amp;rsquo;s first contacts and disciples&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Phenomenology discovers America: phenomenology&amp;rsquo;s first contacts and disciples&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Mikhaylov</surname><given-names>Igor A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Mikhaylov</surname><given-names>Igor A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>ia.mikhaylov@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/humanities/2021/4/4-21-2.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The purpose of the article is to determine the circumstances and patterns that determined the spreading of German phenomenology into the English-speaking world and, first of all, to the United States. A number of the earliest dated documents covering this topic were examined. The results of the work could be summed up as follows. 1)&amp;nbsp;The program of &amp;quot;translating&amp;quot; phenomenological issues into the language of English-language philosophy is clearly divided into diplomatic efforts with respect to both British and North American philosophy; even before the beginning of the 30s (the beginning of the forced emigration of scientists from Europe) philosophers associated with phenomenology were rather interested in the United States and the American type of organization of science. 2)&amp;nbsp;Phenomenology&amp;rsquo;s foreign contacts are to be viewed as a logical continuation of the struggle for recognition that German phenomenologist were engaged in the German scientific community. 3)&amp;nbsp;In his popularization of phenomenology Husserl relies greatly on &amp;quot;idealism&amp;quot;. 4)&amp;nbsp;He tries to get all the help possible from his foreign students and strives to build upon the philosophers that have already received recognition in their homeland (J.&amp;nbsp;Royce). 5)&amp;nbsp;This strategy turns out to be ineffective due to the powerful opposition to idealism characteristic of American philosophy under the influence of pragmatism; this opposition has existed since the beginning of the 20th century, this opposition gradually increases in 1914, 1933 and 1939. 6)&amp;nbsp;Apart from this important omission, Husserl does not seem to be sufficiently familiar with the problems on which his American and British colleagues are working. 7)&amp;nbsp;The penetration of phenomenology into the American world should be viewed as the result of the interaction of two &amp;quot;strategies&amp;quot;: Husserl&amp;#39;s and British-American; The internal contradictions initially present in this complex affected the subsequent understanding of phenomenology in the US.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The purpose of the article is to determine the circumstances and patterns that determined the spreading of German phenomenology into the English-speaking world and, first of all, to the United States. A number of the earliest dated documents covering this topic were examined. The results of the work could be summed up as follows. 1)&amp;nbsp;The program of &amp;quot;translating&amp;quot; phenomenological issues into the language of English-language philosophy is clearly divided into diplomatic efforts with respect to both British and North American philosophy; even before the beginning of the 30s (the beginning of the forced emigration of scientists from Europe) philosophers associated with phenomenology were rather interested in the United States and the American type of organization of science. 2)&amp;nbsp;Phenomenology&amp;rsquo;s foreign contacts are to be viewed as a logical continuation of the struggle for recognition that German phenomenologist were engaged in the German scientific community. 3)&amp;nbsp;In his popularization of phenomenology Husserl relies greatly on &amp;quot;idealism&amp;quot;. 4)&amp;nbsp;He tries to get all the help possible from his foreign students and strives to build upon the philosophers that have already received recognition in their homeland (J.&amp;nbsp;Royce). 5)&amp;nbsp;This strategy turns out to be ineffective due to the powerful opposition to idealism characteristic of American philosophy under the influence of pragmatism; this opposition has existed since the beginning of the 20th century, this opposition gradually increases in 1914, 1933 and 1939. 6)&amp;nbsp;Apart from this important omission, Husserl does not seem to be sufficiently familiar with the problems on which his American and British colleagues are working. 7)&amp;nbsp;The penetration of phenomenology into the American world should be viewed as the result of the interaction of two &amp;quot;strategies&amp;quot;: Husserl&amp;#39;s and British-American; The internal contradictions initially present in this complex affected the subsequent understanding of phenomenology in the US.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>phenomenology</kwd><kwd>idealism</kwd><kwd>philosophy in the US</kwd><kwd>Edmund Husserl</kwd><kwd>Marvin Farber</kwd><kwd>Josiah Royce</kwd><kwd>John Dewey</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>phenomenology</kwd><kwd>idealism</kwd><kwd>philosophy in the US</kwd><kwd>Edmund Husserl</kwd><kwd>Marvin Farber</kwd><kwd>Josiah Royce</kwd><kwd>John Dewey</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Bell,&amp;nbsp;W.&amp;nbsp;P. (2018) Eine kritische Untersuchung der Erkenntnistheorie Josiah Royces. Mit Kommentaren und Änderungsvorschlälgen von Edmund Husserl, in:&amp;nbsp; Husserliana. Dokumente. Bd.&amp;nbsp;V, Springer, Dordrecht (in Deutsch).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Bixler,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;S. (1929), &amp;ldquo;German Phenomenology and Its Implications for Religion&amp;rdquo;, The Journal of Religion, 9 (4), 589-606.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Butler, E.&amp;nbsp;M. (1958), The Tyranny of Greece over Germany. Beacon Press, Boston.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Cho,&amp;nbsp;K.&amp;nbsp;K. (1982), &amp;ldquo;Marvin Farber (1901&amp;ndash;1980) in memoriam&amp;rdquo;, Ph&amp;auml;nomenologische Forschungen, 12, 145-172.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Dewey,&amp;nbsp;J. (1915), German Philosophy and Politics, Henry Holt and Co., New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Dewey,&amp;nbsp;J. (1942), German Philosophy and Politics, G. P. Putnam&amp;rsquo;s Sons, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Edie,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;M. (1970), &amp;ldquo;William James and Phenomenology&amp;rdquo;, The Review of Metaphysics, 23 (3), 481-526.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Farber,&amp;nbsp;M. (1967), Phenomenology and Existence: Toward a Philosophy within Nature. Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Fink,&amp;nbsp;E. (1988), VI. Cartesianische Meditation. I: Die Idee einer Transzendentalen Methodenlehre, in: Husserliana. Dokumente. Bd.&amp;nbsp;II. Teil&amp;nbsp;1. Kluwer, Dordrecht (in Deutsch).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Friess,&amp;nbsp;H.&amp;nbsp;L. (1939), &amp;ldquo;The Progress of German Philosophy in the Last Hundred Years&amp;rdquo;, The Journal of Philosophy, 27 (15), 396-415.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Hocking,&amp;nbsp;W.&amp;nbsp;E. (1959), &amp;ldquo;From the early days of the &amp;quot;Logische Untersuchungen&amp;quot;&amp;rdquo;, Edmund Husserl. 1859-1959. Nijhoff, The Hague, 1&amp;ndash;11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Husserl,&amp;nbsp;E. (1930), &amp;ldquo;Nachwort zu meinen &amp;ldquo;Ideen zu einer reinen Ph&amp;auml;nomenologie und ph&amp;auml;nomenologischen Philosophie&amp;rdquo;&amp;rdquo;, Jahrbuch f&amp;uuml;r Philosophie Und Ph&amp;auml;nomenologische Forschung, 11, 549-570 (in Deutsch).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Husserl,&amp;nbsp;E. (1963), Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vortr&amp;auml;ge, Hg. v. St. Strasser, 2&amp;nbsp;Aufl. Kluwer, Dordrecht (in Deutsch).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Husserl,&amp;nbsp;E. (1970), &amp;ldquo;Syllabus of a Course of Four Lectures on &amp;ldquo;Phenomenological Method and Phenomenological Philosophy&amp;rdquo;&amp;rdquo;, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, (2), 18-23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Husserl, E. (1994a), Briefwechsel, in: Husserliana. Dokumente. Bd. III. Teil 1. Brentano-Schule. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1994 (in Deutsch).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Husserl, E. (1994b), Briefwechsel, in: Husserliana. Dokumente. Bd. III. Teil 2. Die M&amp;uuml;nchener Ph&amp;auml;nomenologen. Dordrecht, Kluwer (in Deutsch).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Husserl, E. (1994c), Briefwechsel, in: Husserliana. Dokumente. Bd. III. Teil 3: Die G&amp;ouml;ttingener Schule. Dordrecht, Kluwer (in Deutsch).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Husserl, E. (1994d), Briefwechsel, in: Husserliana. Dokumente. Bd. III. Teil 4: Die Freiburger Sch&amp;uuml;ler. Dordrecht, Kluwer (in Deutsch).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Husserl, E. (2009), Idei k chistoj fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoj filosofii. Kniga pervaja [Ideen zu einer Reinen Ph&amp;auml;nomenologie und Ph&amp;auml;nomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch], transl. by A.&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;Mihajlov, Akademicheskiy Proyekt, Мoscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Husserl,&amp;nbsp;E. (2010), &amp;ldquo;Fichtes Ideal Der Menschheit. Drei Vorlesungen&amp;rdquo;, Ezhegodnik po fenomenologicheskoj filosofii [Annual for phenomenological Philosophy]. 2009/2010, Rossiуskу gosudarstvenny gumanitarny universitet, Moscow, 366-394 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Kraushaar,&amp;nbsp;O.&amp;nbsp;F. (1940), &amp;ldquo;Lotze&amp;#39;s Influence on the Pragmatism and Practical Philosophy of William James&amp;rdquo;, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1940, 4 (1), 439-458.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>McGill,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;J. (1940) &amp;ldquo;Notes on Philosophy in Nazi Germany&amp;rdquo;, Science &amp;amp; Society, 4 (1), 12-28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Metzger,&amp;nbsp;A. (1966), Ph&amp;auml;nomenologie und Metaphysik. Das Problem des Relativismus und seiner &amp;Uuml;berwindung. 2. Aufl. III (1. Aufl. 1933), Pfullingen, 1966 (in Deutsch).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Metzger,&amp;nbsp;A. (1979), Ph&amp;auml;nomenologie der Revolution. Fr&amp;uuml;he Schriften. Syndikat, Frankfurt a. M. (in Deutsch).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Schneider,&amp;nbsp;H. (1957), Geschichte der amerikanischen Philosophie. Meiner Verl., Hamburg (in Deutsch).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Spicker,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;F. (1971), &amp;ldquo;Shadworth Hodgson&amp;#39;s Reduction as an Anticipation of Husserl&amp;#39;s Phenomenological Psychology&amp;rdquo;, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology. 2 (2), 57-73 (in Deutsch).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Spiegelberg,&amp;nbsp;H. (1981) The Context of the Phenomenological Movement (Phaenomenologica, vol. 80), Springer, Dordrecht.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Spiegelberg, H. (1994) The Phenomenological Movement, 3d Edit, Nijhoff, The Hague.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Wind,&amp;nbsp;E. (1925) &amp;ldquo;Contemporary German Philosophy. II&amp;rdquo;, The Journal of Philosophy, 22 (19), 516-530.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>