2408-932XResearch Result. Social Studies and Humanities2408-932X10.18413/2408-932X-2022-8-4-0-12920RESEARCHES<strong>Trust in the subject in the discourse of religious experience (boundary hermeneutics)</strong><strong>Trust in the subject in the discourse of religious experience (boundary hermeneutics)</strong>ChelovenkoTatiana G.ChelovenkoTatiana G.chelovenko@inbox.ruTurgenev Orel State University20228400

In the article, the author shows the importance of reviving attention to religious experience not only as a practice of personal salvation, but also as a discourse. Religious experience, if viewed this way, can be authentically included into the scientific paradigm of modernity, and therefore contribute to overcoming the alienation of religious tradition from personal and public life, from science, which results from classical formulations of authenticity, objectivity, truth, etc. of the knowledge obtained. The author presents his idea of a discourse that can reveal the boundary hermeneutics and satisfy the research interest in the unity of the interpreted meaning and the over-meaningful &quot;experience&quot;, &quot;word&quot; and &quot;event&quot;, i.e., to such an understanding of religious experience that will be as close as possible to the religious tradition. In this article, the emerging topic of the boundaries of cognition, its ultimate foundations is viewed through the prism of changes in the methodological status of &quot;subject-object relations&quot;, which is being transformed today due to the increasing actualization of the principle of trust in the subject.

In the article, the author shows the importance of reviving attention to religious experience not only as a practice of personal salvation, but also as a discourse. Religious experience, if viewed this way, can be authentically included into the scientific paradigm of modernity, and therefore contribute to overcoming the alienation of religious tradition from personal and public life, from science, which results from classical formulations of authenticity, objectivity, truth, etc. of the knowledge obtained. The author presents his idea of a discourse that can reveal the boundary hermeneutics and satisfy the research interest in the unity of the interpreted meaning and the over-meaningful &quot;experience&quot;, &quot;word&quot; and &quot;event&quot;, i.e., to such an understanding of religious experience that will be as close as possible to the religious tradition. In this article, the emerging topic of the boundaries of cognition, its ultimate foundations is viewed through the prism of changes in the methodological status of &quot;subject-object relations&quot;, which is being transformed today due to the increasing actualization of the principle of trust in the subject.

existential-phenomenological discoursereligious experiencesubject-object relationsultimate conceptexistential-phenomenological discoursereligious experiencesubject-object relationsultimate conceptСписок литературыAugustine Aurelius (2013), Ispoved&#39; [Confessions], Transl. bySergienko,&nbsp;M.E.; edited by Kazansky,&nbsp;N.N., Nauka, Saint-Petersburg, Russia (in Russ.).Arshinov,&nbsp;D.&nbsp;M. (2001), &ldquo;Transcendental in Rational and Mystical Cognition&rdquo;, Ph.D. Thesis in philosophy, Saratov, Russia (in Russ.).Windelband,&nbsp;W. (2007), Istoriya novoy filosofii v ee svyazi s obshchey kul&#39;turoy i otdel&#39;nymi naukami: V&nbsp;2&nbsp;t. T.&nbsp;2: Ot Kanta do Nietzsche [The History of New Philosophy in its Connection with General Culture and Individual Sciences: In 2 vols. Vol.&nbsp;2: From Kant to Nietzsche], in Vvedensky,&nbsp;A. (ed.), Giperboreya &amp; Kuchkovo pole, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Hegel,&nbsp;G.&nbsp;W.&nbsp;F. (2018), Nauka logiki [Science of logic], AST Publishing House, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Hegel,&nbsp;G.&nbsp;W.&nbsp;F. (1974), Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. T.&nbsp;1. Nauka logiki [Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences. V.&nbsp;1 Science of logic], Mysl, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Ilyin,&nbsp;I.&nbsp;A. (1993), Aksiomy religioznogo opyta: Issledovaniye. T.&nbsp;1-2. T.&nbsp;1. [Axioms of Religious Experience: A Study. Vols.&nbsp;1-2. V.&nbsp;1.], TOO &ldquo;Rarog&quot;, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Jorgensen,&nbsp;M.&nbsp;W. &amp; Phillips,&nbsp;L.&nbsp;J. (2008), Diskurs-analiz. Teoriya i metod [Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method], Gumanitarnyy tsentr, Kharkov, Ukraine (in Russ.).Kant,&nbsp;I. (1997), &ldquo;Critique of Practical Reason&rdquo;, Kant,&nbsp;I. Works in German and Russian. In 4&nbsp;vols. Vol.&nbsp;3., Moskovskiy filosofskiy fond, Moscow, Russia, 277-733 (in Russ.).Kant,&nbsp;I. (2022), Prolegomeny [Prolegomena], Transl. by Solovyov,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;S., Yurayt, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Kasavin,&nbsp;I.&nbsp;T. (1996), K ponyatiyu predel&#39;nogo opyta [On the Concept of Ultimate Experience], in Scientific and non-scientific forms of thinking, IFRAN: Center for the Study of German philosophy and sociology, Moscow, [Online] URL: http://filosof.historic.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000057/index.shtml (Accessed 21&nbsp;March 2021), (in Russ.).Kuzmina,&nbsp;T.&nbsp;A. (2014), Ekzistentsial&#39;naya filosofiya [Existential Philosophy], &ldquo;Kanon+&rdquo;, ROOI &ldquo;Reabilitaciya&rdquo;, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Leibniz, G.&nbsp;W. (2020), Monadologiya [Monadology], RIPOL klassik, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Lyubutin,&nbsp;K.&nbsp;N. &amp; Pivovarov,&nbsp;D.&nbsp;V. (1993), Dialektika sub&rsquo;ekta i ob&rsquo;ekta [Dialectics of Subject and Object], Publishing House of the Ural University, Yekaterinburg, Russia (in Russ.).Medova,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;A. (2020), &ldquo;Is the Concept of &lsquo;Phenomenological Discourse&rsquo; Appropriate?&rdquo;, in: Orders of discourse in philosophy and culture. Alyoshin&rsquo;s readings-2020, Moscow, Barnaul, 105-109 (in Russ.).M&uuml;ller,&nbsp;F.&nbsp;M. (2002), Vvedenie v nauku o religii [An Introduction to the Science of Religion: Four Lectures Delivered at the Royal Institution of London in February-March 1870 / ed. by Krasnikova,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;N.; transl. from English, foreword and comments by Elbakyan,&nbsp;E.&nbsp;S.], Knizhnyy dom &ldquo;Universitet&rdquo;, Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Syomushkin,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;V. (2009), Izbrannye sochineniya [Selected Works] in 2&nbsp;volumes. V&nbsp;2., RUDN, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Sokolov,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;V. (1999), Ot filosofii antichnosti k filosofii novogo vremeni. Sub&rsquo;ekt-ob&rsquo;ektnaya paradigma [From the Philosophy of Antiquity to the Philosophy of Modern Times. Subject-object paradigm], Editorial URSS, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Sokolov,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;V. (1995), &ldquo;Philosophy in Historical Perspective&rdquo;, Voprosy filosofii, 2, 134&ndash;147 (in Russ.).Sokuler,&nbsp;Z.&nbsp;A. (2017), &ldquo;Historical Epistemology and the Fate of the Philosophical Theory of Knowledge&rdquo;, Epistemology &amp; Philosophy of Science, 52 (2), 29-33 (in Russ.).Sokuler,&nbsp;Z.&nbsp;A. (2007), &ldquo;How to Get Rid of the Power of the &lsquo;Cartesian Paradigm&rsquo;?&rdquo;, Filosofiya soznaniya: klassika i sovremennost&#39;: Materialy II Gryaznovskikh chteniy [Philosophy of Consciousness: Classics and Modernity: Materials of the II Gryaznov Readings], Publisher Savin, Moscow, Russia, 173-185 (in Russ.).Fichte,&nbsp;J.&nbsp;G. (1993), Vtoroe vvedenie v naukouchenie, dlya chitateley, uzhe imeyushchikh filosofskuyu sistemu [The Second Introduction to Wissenschaftslehre, for Readers Who Already Have a Philosophical System. In 2&nbsp;vols. V.&nbsp;1.], Mifril, St.&nbsp;Petersburg, Russia, 477-546 (in Russ.).Fichte,&nbsp;J.&nbsp;G. (1993), Naznachenie cheloveka [The Vocation of Man (Die Bestimmung des Menschen) Works in 2 volumes. Vol.&nbsp;II.], Mifril, St.&nbsp;Petersburg, (in Russ.).Schelling,&nbsp;F.&nbsp;W.&nbsp;J. (1987), Sistema transcendentalnogo idealizma [System of Transcendental Idealism. Works in 2 vols. V.&nbsp;1.], Mysl, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).