2408-932XResearch Result. Social Studies and Humanities2408-932X10.18413/2408-932X-2022-8-4-0-62925RESEARCHES<strong>Pure being as the prime meridian of culture</strong><br /> &nbsp;<strong>Pure being as the prime meridian of culture</strong><br /> &nbsp;. MaltsevYaroslav V.. MaltsevYaroslav V.maltsevyaroslav@gmail.comTyumen State University20228400

The article attempts to apply the Hegelian term &laquo;pure being&raquo; to the phenomenon of culture, to use the concept for a broader and more capacious understanding of the essence of culture, its connection with man and the universe, as well as directly man (carrier and condition of culture) and the universe (conditions of culture). The article is relevant, firstly, within the framework of S.&nbsp;Zizek&rsquo;s call to return to Hegel and be terrorized by Hegel in order to better comprehend the present, and secondly, in the context of the ongoing ontological turn in philosophy, associated, among other things, with the so-called an object-oriented ontology that combines the concepts of a number of authors (K.&nbsp;Meillassoux, G.&nbsp;Harman, L.&nbsp;Bryant, etc.). The work is inevitably based on the works of G.W.F.&nbsp;Hegel, E.&nbsp;Husserl, M.&nbsp;Buber, M.&nbsp;Heidegger, J.-P.&nbsp;Sartre, as well as J.&nbsp;Lacan and A.V.&nbsp;Pavlova. Reflection on the essence and meaning of pure being as a phenomenon is carried out in the context of a situation of permanent modernity, which is a special relationship between man and being, in constant dialogue, co-creation and creation of culture as an Imaginary (Lacan) scene of the action of time/history. As a result, a conclusion is made about pure being as a condition for the formation of culture and man, where man, the bearer of reason, is a necessary link in the evolution of pure being in and for himself for the sake of knowing himself at the moment of his unfolding.

The article attempts to apply the Hegelian term &laquo;pure being&raquo; to the phenomenon of culture, to use the concept for a broader and more capacious understanding of the essence of culture, its connection with man and the universe, as well as directly man (carrier and condition of culture) and the universe (conditions of culture). The article is relevant, firstly, within the framework of S.&nbsp;Zizek&rsquo;s call to return to Hegel and be terrorized by Hegel in order to better comprehend the present, and secondly, in the context of the ongoing ontological turn in philosophy, associated, among other things, with the so-called an object-oriented ontology that combines the concepts of a number of authors (K.&nbsp;Meillassoux, G.&nbsp;Harman, L.&nbsp;Bryant, etc.). The work is inevitably based on the works of G.W.F.&nbsp;Hegel, E.&nbsp;Husserl, M.&nbsp;Buber, M.&nbsp;Heidegger, J.-P.&nbsp;Sartre, as well as J.&nbsp;Lacan and A.V.&nbsp;Pavlova. Reflection on the essence and meaning of pure being as a phenomenon is carried out in the context of a situation of permanent modernity, which is a special relationship between man and being, in constant dialogue, co-creation and creation of culture as an Imaginary (Lacan) scene of the action of time/history. As a result, a conclusion is made about pure being as a condition for the formation of culture and man, where man, the bearer of reason, is a necessary link in the evolution of pure being in and for himself for the sake of knowing himself at the moment of his unfolding.

modernitypermanent modernitybeingdialogobject-oriented ontologysubjectphilosophy of culturemodernitypermanent modernitybeingdialogobject-oriented ontologysubjectphilosophy of cultureСписок литературыAristotle (2006), Metafizika [Metaphysics], Izd-vo Eksmo, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Aristotle (1981), Sochineniya [Essays] in 4vols. V.&nbsp;3, Mysl&#39;, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Bennett,&nbsp;Ja. (2018), Pulsiruyushhaya materiya: Politicheskaya ekologiya veshhey [Pulsating Matter: The Political Ecology of Things], Gile Press, Perm&#39;, Russia (in Russ.).Bespalaya,&nbsp;O.&nbsp;P. (2014), &ldquo;Posle postmoderna: altermodern, transmodern, postpostmodern&hellip;&rdquo;, Gumanitarnye, sotsialno-ekonomicheskie i obshhestvennye nauki, 3, 1-5 (in Russ.).Borisov,&nbsp;S.&nbsp;V. (2013), &ldquo;What it means to be modern (in the context of the article by A.V. Pavlov &quot;Notes on modernity and subjectivity&quot;)&rdquo;, SOCIUM and POWER, 3, 123-126 (in Russ.).Brooks,&nbsp;N. and Toth,&nbsp;J. (2007), The Mourning After. Attending the Wake of Postmodernism, Amsterdam, New York: Rodopy.Buber,&nbsp;M. (1995), Dva obraza very [Two Types of Faith], Respublika, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Burrio,&nbsp;N. (2016), Relyatsionnaya estetika. Postproduktsiya [Esth&eacute;tique relationnelle. Postproduction], Ad Marginem Press, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Chernyahovskiy,&nbsp;S.F. (2013), Traditsiya, modern i sverkhmodern. Perelom. Sbornik statey o spravedlivosti traditsii [Tradition, modern and supermodern. A fracture. Collection of articles on the justice of tradition], PROBEL-2000, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Chuprov,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;S. (2013), &ldquo;The modernity of the postmodernist, or &lsquo;Nowhere to run&rsquo;&rdquo;, Society and Power, 2, 129-131 (in Russ.).Deutsch,&nbsp;D. (2021), Struktura realnosti: Nauka parallelnyh vselennyh [The Structure of Reality: The Science of Parallel Universes] Alpina non-fikshn, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Ershov,&nbsp;Yu.&nbsp;G. (2013), &ldquo;Modernity as a problem&rdquo;, Society and Power, 5, 131-136 (in Russ.).Eshelman,&nbsp;R. (2008), Performatism, or the End of Postmodernism, Aurora, CO: Davies Group.Fedorov,&nbsp;Yu.&nbsp;M. (1992), Universum morali [The Universe of Morality], SO RAS, Tyumen Scientific Center, Tyumen, Russia (in Russ.).Gilson,&nbsp;E. (2004), Izbrannoe: Hristianskaja filosofija, &laquo;Rossijskaja politicheskaja entsiklopedija&raquo; [Favorites: Christian Philosophy], ROSSPEN, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Hegel,&nbsp;G.W.F. (2019), Nauka logiki [The Science of Logic], Izdatelstvo AST, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Heidegger,&nbsp;M. (2015), Bytie i vremya [Being and Time], Akademicheskiy proekt, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Hutcheon,&nbsp;L. (2002), The Politics of Postmodernism, New York; London: Routledge.Ilyin,&nbsp;I.&nbsp;P. (1998), Postmodernizm ot istokov do kontsa stoletiya. Evolyutsiya nauchnogo mifa [Postmodernism from its origins to the end of the century. The Evolution of the scientific myth], Intrada, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Ilyin,&nbsp;I.&nbsp;P. (1996), Poststrukturalizm. Dekonstruktivizm. Postmodernizm [Poststructuralism. Deconstructivism. Postmodernism], Intrada, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Kimelev,&nbsp;Ju.&nbsp;A. and Poljakova,&nbsp;N.&nbsp;L. (1996), Sotsiologicheskie teorii moderna, radikalizirovannogo moderna i postmoderna [Sociological theories of modernity, radicalized modernity and postmodernity], INION RAN, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Kirby,&nbsp;А. (2006), &ldquo;The death of postmodernism and beyond&rdquo;, Philosophy now, 58, 34-37.Kutyrev,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;A. and Karzhina,&nbsp;G.&nbsp;A. (2017), &ldquo;Consciousness of the civilization of the transmodern era&rdquo;, Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 1, 5-12 (in Russ.).Lebedev,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;V. (2014), Logos Geraklita. Rekonstruktsija mysli i slova (s novym kriticheskim izdaniem fragmentov) [The Logos of Heraclitus. Reconstruction of thought and word (with a new critical edition of fragments)], Nauka, Sankt-Petersburg, Russia (in Russ.).Leibniz,&nbsp;G.-W. (1982), &ldquo;Monadology&rdquo;, Sochineniya v chetyreh tomah: Tom I [Essays in four volumes: Vol.&nbsp;I], Mysl, Moscow, Russia, 413-429 (in Russ.).Lipovetsky,&nbsp;G. (2001), Era pustoty. Esse o sovremennom individualizme [The era of emptiness. Essays on modern individualism], Vladimir Dal, Sankt-Petersburg, Russia (in Russ.).Lipovetsky,&nbsp;G. (2012), Imperiya efemernogo [Empire of the Ephemeral], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Meillassoux,&nbsp;Q. (2015), Posle konechnosti: esse o neobkhodimosti kontingentnosti [After Finiteness: An Essay on the necessity of contingent], Kabinetnyy uchenyy, Ekaterinburg; Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Moraru,&nbsp;C. (2001), Rewriting: Postmodern Narrative and Cultural Critique in the Age of Cloning, SUNY Press, Albany, US.Nalimov,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;V., Drogalina,&nbsp;Zh.A. (1984), &ldquo;Probabilistic model of the unconscious. The unconscious as a manifestation of the semantic universe&rdquo;, Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 5, 6, 111-122 (in Russ.).Nealon,&nbsp;J.&nbsp;T. (2012), Post-postmodernism, or, The logic of just-in-time capitalism, Stanford University Press, Stanford, US.Pavlov,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;V. (2013), &ldquo;Notes on modernity and subjectivity. Criteria of modernity&rdquo;, Society and Power, 1, 5-14 (in Russ.).Pavlov,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;V. (2012), &ldquo;Notes on modernity and subjectivity. Modernity and plasticity&rdquo;, Society and Power, 6, 5-11 (in Russ.).Pavlov,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;V. (2019), Postpostmodernizm: kak sotsialnaya i kulturnaya teorii obyasnyayut nashe vremya [Post-Postmodernism: How Social and Cultural Theories explain Our time], Publishing house &ldquo;Delo&rdquo; RANEPA, 2019, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Pelipenko,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;A. (2016) &ldquo;Neomodern Manifesto&rdquo;, Personality. Culture. Society, 18 (91-92), iss.&nbsp;3-4, 40-49 (in Russ.).Ritzer,&nbsp;G. (2002), Sovremennye sotsiologicheskie teorii [Modern sociological theories], Piter, Sankt-Petersburg, Russia (in Russ.).Ritzer,&nbsp;G. (2011), Makdonaldizatsiya obshhestva 5 [The Mcdonaldization of society&nbsp;5], Praksis, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Sartre,&nbsp;J.-P. (2000), Bytie i nichto: Opyt fenomenologicheskoy ontologii [Being and Nothingness: The Experience of Phenomenological Ontology], Respublika, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Shtykov,&nbsp;D.&nbsp;R. (2019), &ldquo;The Phenomenological ontology of Roman Ingarden&rdquo;, Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Spiridonova,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;I. (2017), &ldquo;&quot;New modernity&quot; and traditional values&rdquo;, Filosofskie nauki, 6, 35-49 (in Russ.).Starodubtseva,&nbsp;L.&nbsp;V. (2010), &ldquo;Altermodern&rdquo;, Kakoy modern? Filosofskie refleksii nad situatsiej post/nedo/after-post/post-post&hellip;modernizma. Tom&nbsp;1 [What is modern? Philosophical reflections on the situation of post/under/after-post/post-post...of modernism. Vol.&nbsp;1.], V.&nbsp;N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Harkov, Ukraine (in Russ.).Tormakhova,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;N. (2016), &ldquo;Art in the theories of post-postmodernism&rdquo;, Studia Culturae, 1, 18-26 (in Russ.).Tulchinsky,&nbsp;G.&nbsp;L. (2013), &ldquo;Modernity and subjectivity&rdquo;, Society and Power, 3, 116-122 (in Russ.).Turner,&nbsp;T. (1995), City as Landscape: A Post Post-modern View of Design and Planning, London: Taylor &amp; Francis.Vermeulen,&nbsp;T., Akker van, den R. &ldquo;Notes on Metamodernism&rdquo;, METAMODERN [Online], available at: http://metamodernizm.ru/notes-on-metamodernism/ (Accessed: 23.07.2022) (in Russ.).