2408-932XResearch Result. Social Studies and Humanities2408-932X10.18413/2408-932X-2023-9-1-0-63016RESEARCHES<strong>Communicology among the social sciences: radius of influence and competition</strong><strong>Communicology among the social sciences: radius of influence and competition</strong>KhorolskyViktor V.KhorolskyViktor V.khorolbox@mail.ruVoronezh State University20239100

The problematic nature of the article stems from the need to clarify our ideas about the place of communicology in the commonwealth of the humanities, which is relevant in the situation of the digital revolution and media globalization. The research method is informational and culturological scrutiny, based on the ideas of comparative studies and linguoculturology outlined in the works of J.&nbsp;Baudrillard, L.&nbsp;Zemlyanova, M.&nbsp;Bakhtin, N.&nbsp;Chomsky. Communicology (related concepts: Communication science, Media Studies, Medienwissenschaft), becomes the main direction of the scientific matrix, involving the consolidation and deepening of the overall landscape in humanitarian knowledge, enriching the theory of journalism and communication studies with new approaches to the study of media. The analysis of people&#39;s behavior in the field of media interactions is largely determined by the structure and functioning of media discourses. The key idea and indicator of the relevance of the article is the lexeme &quot;irreplaceability&quot;, the irreducibility of this science to the methods of related sciences and especially to the paradigms of political economy, sociology and psychology. As a result of the analysis of co-creation and competition of sciences, conclusions were drawn about the place of communication in society, about the contradictions in interaction in the field of political life. Communicology, acting as a vector and indicator of mediatization in all social, helps social sciences to identify the general aesthetic parameters of socio-cultural processes, it influences the role of the media in everyday life, records the growth of digital activity.

The problematic nature of the article stems from the need to clarify our ideas about the place of communicology in the commonwealth of the humanities, which is relevant in the situation of the digital revolution and media globalization. The research method is informational and culturological scrutiny, based on the ideas of comparative studies and linguoculturology outlined in the works of J.&nbsp;Baudrillard, L.&nbsp;Zemlyanova, M.&nbsp;Bakhtin, N.&nbsp;Chomsky. Communicology (related concepts: Communication science, Media Studies, Medienwissenschaft), becomes the main direction of the scientific matrix, involving the consolidation and deepening of the overall landscape in humanitarian knowledge, enriching the theory of journalism and communication studies with new approaches to the study of media. The analysis of people&#39;s behavior in the field of media interactions is largely determined by the structure and functioning of media discourses. The key idea and indicator of the relevance of the article is the lexeme &quot;irreplaceability&quot;, the irreducibility of this science to the methods of related sciences and especially to the paradigms of political economy, sociology and psychology. As a result of the analysis of co-creation and competition of sciences, conclusions were drawn about the place of communication in society, about the contradictions in interaction in the field of political life. Communicology, acting as a vector and indicator of mediatization in all social, helps social sciences to identify the general aesthetic parameters of socio-cultural processes, it influences the role of the media in everyday life, records the growth of digital activity.

communicologyjournalism theorymedia textmedia discourseboundary between sciencesconflict of interestscommunicologyjournalism theorymedia textmedia discourseboundary between sciencesconflict of interestsСписок литературыBaudrillard,&nbsp;J. (1972), &ldquo;Requiem pour les Medias&rdquo; [Requiem for the Media], Pour une Critique de L&rsquo;economie Politique du Signe [For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign], Editions Gallimard, Paris, France, 200-228 (in Fr.).Berelson,&nbsp;V. (1960), &ldquo;Communications and Public Opinion&rdquo;, Mass Communications, in Schramm,&nbsp;W. (ed.), University of Illinois Press, Urbana, USA, 527-543.Berger,&nbsp;P. and Lukman,&nbsp;T. (1995), Sotsial&#39;noe konstruirovanie realnosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya [The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge], Translated by E.&nbsp;Rutkevich, Medium, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Berko,&nbsp;R.&nbsp;M., Wolvin,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;D., Wolvin,&nbsp;D.&nbsp;R. and Aitken,&nbsp;J.&nbsp;E. (2016), Communicating. A Social, Career, and Cultural Focus, 12th edition, Routledge, New York, US, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315506937.Catt,&nbsp;I.&nbsp;E. and Eicher-Catt,&nbsp;D. (ed.) (2010), Communicology: The New Science of Embodied Discourse, Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, New Jersey, US.Chudinov,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;P. (2006), Politicheskaya lingvistika [Political Linguistics], Flinta: Nauka, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Diyakova,&nbsp;E.&nbsp;G. and Trakhtenberg,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;D. (1999), Massovaya kommunikatsiya i problema konstruirovaniya realnosti: analiz osnovnykh teoreticheskikh podлhodov [Mass communication and the problem of constructing of reality: analysis of the main theoretical approaches], UrO RAN, Ekaterinburg, Russia (in Russ.).Fairclough,&nbsp;N., &amp; Wodak,&nbsp;R. (1997). &ldquo;Critical Discourse Analysis&rdquo;, In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, vol. 2, Sage, London, UK, 258-284.Homsky,&nbsp;N. (2016), Izbrannoe [Selections], in E. Arnouv (ed.), Transl, by S.&nbsp;Aleksandrovskiy and V.&nbsp;Glushakov, Entsiklopediya-ru, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Khorolsky,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;V. (2018), &ldquo;&lsquo;Beauty&rsquo; and &lsquo;Usefulness&rsquo; in a Media Text: Towards the Development Paths of Mass Media Theory&rdquo;, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya&nbsp;10. Zhurnalistika, 3, 72-90, DOI: 10.30547/vestnik.journ.3.2018.7290 (in Russ.).Khorolsky,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;V. (2016a), &ldquo;Communication science and theory of journalism: Siamese twins or distant relatives&rdquo;, Scientific research and development. Modern communication studies, 5 (2), 8-16, https://doi.org/10.12737/18961 (in Russ.).Khorolsky,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;V. (2016b), Mediynost tekstov v sredstvakh massovoy informatsii: (istoricheskiye i teoreticheskiye problemy) [Media texts in the media: (historical and theoretical problems)], VSU Publishing House, Voronezh, Russia (in Russ.).Kostina,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;V. (2005), Massovaya kultura kak fenomen postindustrialnogo obshchestva [Mass culture as a phenomenon of post-industrial society], Moscow humanitarian and social Academy, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Kozhemyakin,&nbsp;E.&nbsp;A. (2018), &ldquo;Media Discourse in the focus of social construction: Empirical practices in media communities&rdquo;, Mediynyi tekst: sotsialnye praktiki, tekhnologii, teorii [Media text: social practices, technologies, theories], Publishing House of Belgorod State University, Belgorod, Russia, 158-200 (in Russ.).Kozhemyakin,&nbsp;E.&nbsp;A. (2007), &ldquo;The discourse matrix of institutional culture&rdquo;, Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. Series: Philosophy, 5 (2), 58-63 (in Russ.).Pastukhov,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;G. (2012), &ldquo;The model of scientific humanitarian culture: language, thematization-medialization&rdquo;, Zhanry i tipy teksta v nauchnom i mediynom diskurse [Genres and types of text in scientific and media discourse, inter-university collection of scientific works], iss. 10, in Pastukhov,&nbsp;A.G. (ed.), Gorizont, Orel, Russia, 36-54 (in Russ.).Polonsky,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;V. (2014), &ldquo;Mass media as a category of discourse and text&rdquo;, Diskurs sovremennykh mass-media v perspektive teorii, socialnoy praktiki i obrazovaniya [The discourse of modern mass media in the perspective of theory, social practice and education], in Kozhemyakin,&nbsp;E.A. and Polonskiy,&nbsp;A.V. (ed.), CONSTANTA, Belgorod, 110-122 (in Russ.).Sharkov,&nbsp;F.&nbsp;I. and Yudina,&nbsp;E.&nbsp;N. (2013), &ldquo;Regulation of relations in the modern media space&rdquo;, Communicology, 1 (1), 36-43 (in Russ.).Skinner,&nbsp;B.&nbsp;F. (2015), Po tu storonu svobody i dostoinstva [Beyond Freedom and Dignity], Translated by A.&nbsp;A.&nbsp;Fedorov, Operant, Mozhaysk, Russia (in Russ.).Sokolov,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;V. (2014), Sotsialnye kommunikatsii [Social Communications], Professiya, St.&nbsp;Peterburg, Russia (in Russ.).Uncapher,&nbsp;M.&nbsp;R. and Wagner,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;D. (2018), &ldquo;Minds and brains of media multitaskers: Current findings and future directions&rdquo;, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115&nbsp;(40), 9889-9896, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1611612115.Zemlyanova,&nbsp;L.&nbsp;M. (2004), Kommunikativistika i sredstva informatsii. Anglo-russkiy tolkovyy slovar&#39; kontseptsiy i terminov [Communication and Media. An English-Russian Explanatory Dictionary of Concepts and Terms], Publishing House of Moscow University, Moscow, Russia, (in Russ.).Zotov,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;V., Vasilyeva,&nbsp;I.&nbsp;N. and Krivoukhov,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;A. (2022), &ldquo;Social and network interaction on the Internet: to the definition of the media phenomenon&rdquo;, Communicology, 10 (4), 13-22, https:/doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2022-10-4-13-22 (in Russ.).