2408-932XResearch Result. Social Studies and Humanities2408-932X10.18413/2408-932X-2023-9-1-0-83018RESEARCHES<strong>Method of interpretation in the aspect of inference on the example of media discourse on vaccination</strong><strong>Method of interpretation in the aspect of inference on the example of media discourse on vaccination</strong>IakobaIrina A.IakobaIrina A.irina_yakoba@mail.ruIrkutsk National Research Technical University20239100

The purpose of the study is to prove the validity of the methods of interpretation and inference for a comprehensive interdisciplinary analysis of media creolized advertising texts. The method of interpretation in the aspect of inference allows us to consider the situation both from the position of the addresser and from the position of the addressee, which leads to a wider coverage of opinions, positions, points of view for a deeper understanding of the problem. The method of cognitive modeling contributes to a visual representation of cognitive processes that arise when faced with a problem, challenge, situation of cognitive uncertainty. The synergy of these directions contributes to the expansion of the applied possibilities of the methods of inference and interpretation. The potential of the methods is enhanced with a multipolar approach to analysis, taking into account the polar value positions of the addresser and addressee, considered on the material of slogans and announcements about vaccination against coronavirus. Among the identified linguocognitive mechanisms in given examples, we note framing, focusing, involvement, imagining, dialogization, metaphorization, personalization. As a result of the study, a cognitive model of the mechanisms of the coronavirus vaccination situation examples is presented. The model demonstrates a wide coverage of linguocognitive mechanisms that are activated when perceiving, evaluating, analyzing and interpreting the attractive vaccination process that every person faces. To understand the basis of the choice facing each law-abiding member of society, the author&#39;s method of a synergistic approach to analysis is proposed.

The purpose of the study is to prove the validity of the methods of interpretation and inference for a comprehensive interdisciplinary analysis of media creolized advertising texts. The method of interpretation in the aspect of inference allows us to consider the situation both from the position of the addresser and from the position of the addressee, which leads to a wider coverage of opinions, positions, points of view for a deeper understanding of the problem. The method of cognitive modeling contributes to a visual representation of cognitive processes that arise when faced with a problem, challenge, situation of cognitive uncertainty. The synergy of these directions contributes to the expansion of the applied possibilities of the methods of inference and interpretation. The potential of the methods is enhanced with a multipolar approach to analysis, taking into account the polar value positions of the addresser and addressee, considered on the material of slogans and announcements about vaccination against coronavirus. Among the identified linguocognitive mechanisms in given examples, we note framing, focusing, involvement, imagining, dialogization, metaphorization, personalization. As a result of the study, a cognitive model of the mechanisms of the coronavirus vaccination situation examples is presented. The model demonstrates a wide coverage of linguocognitive mechanisms that are activated when perceiving, evaluating, analyzing and interpreting the attractive vaccination process that every person faces. To understand the basis of the choice facing each law-abiding member of society, the author&#39;s method of a synergistic approach to analysis is proposed.

interpretationinferencemedia discoursevaluesmechanismsvaccinationinterpretationinferencemedia discoursevaluesmechanismsvaccinationСписок литературыAbels,&nbsp;H. (1998), &ldquo;Romantics, Phenomenological Sociology and Qualitative Social Research&rdquo; The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 1(1), 114-138 (in Russ.).Arutyunova,&nbsp;N.&nbsp;D. (1999), Yazyk i mir cheloveka [Language and the human world], Jazyki russkoj kul&#39;tury, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Brown,&nbsp;G. and Yule,&nbsp;G. (1983), Discourse Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, N.Y., US.Demjankov,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;Z. (1989), Interpretatsiya, ponimaniye i lingvisticheskiye aspekty ikh modelirovaniya na EVM [Interpretation, understanding and linguistic aspects of their computer modeling], Publishing House of Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Gadamer,&nbsp;H.-G. (1988), Istina i metod: osnovy filosofskoj germenevtiki. [Truth and Method: Principles of Philosophical Hermeneutics], Translated from German edited by Bessonov,&nbsp;B.&nbsp;N., Progress, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Gamson,&nbsp;W.&nbsp;A., Croteau,&nbsp;D., Hoynes,&nbsp;W. and Sasson,&nbsp;T. (1992), &ldquo;Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality&rdquo; Annual Review of Sociology, 18(1), 373-393, DOI: 10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.002105Graesser,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;C., Singer,&nbsp;M. and Trabasso,&nbsp;T. (1994), &ldquo;Constructing Inferences During Narrative Text Comprehension&rdquo;, Psychological Review, 101(3), 371-395.Iakoba,&nbsp;I.&nbsp;A. (2017), Lingvokognitivnye parametry diskursa v tehnologii &lsquo;Umnaja nastrojka&rsquo; [Linguo-cognitive parameters of discourse in the &ldquo;Smart setting&rdquo; technology], Publishing house of IRNITU, Irkutsk, Russia (in Russ.).Izmajlova,&nbsp;T.&nbsp;V. (2011), &ldquo;Sampling in qualitative sociological research as a theoretical and methodological problem&rdquo;, Kachestvennye metody. Sociologicheskie metody v sovremennoj issledovatel&#39;skoj praktike [Qualitative methods. Sociological methods in modern research practice], in Oberemko,&nbsp;O.&nbsp;A. (ed.), HSE Publishing House, Moscow, Russia, 140-143 (in Russ.).Khakhalova,&nbsp;S.&nbsp;A. (2013), The Essence of Metaphor Revisited: On A Dynamic of Rational vs. Emotional, Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta, 4, 90-95 (in Russ.).Kubrjakova,&nbsp;E.&nbsp;S. (ed.) (1997), Kratkiy slovar&#39; kognitivnykh terminov [Brief Dictionary of Cognitive Terms], Faculty of Philology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Minsky,&nbsp;M. (1979), Freymy dlya predstavleniya znaniy [A framework for representing knowledge], Energiya, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Myshkina,&nbsp;N.&nbsp;L. (1991), Dinamiko-sistemnoe issledovanie smysla teksta [Dynamic-system study of the meaning of the text], Publishing House of Krasnoyarsk University, Krasnoyarsk, Russia (in Russ.).Rickheit,&nbsp;G. and Strohner,&nbsp;H. (1985), Inferences in text processing, North Holland, Amsterdam, New York.Ricoeur,&nbsp;P. (1996), Konflikt interpretatsiy: ocherki o germenevtike [Conflict of Interpretations: Essays on Hermeneutics], Translated from French by Vdovina,&nbsp;I.&nbsp;S., Akademicheskiy proyekt, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Rubtsova,&nbsp;S.&nbsp;P. (2016), &ldquo;Interpretation and explanation: two approaches to understanding the text&rdquo;, Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Filosofiya, 2, 56-66 (in Russ.).Rustier,&nbsp;F. (2001), Interpretiruyushchaya semantika [Interpretive semantics], Dekom, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia (in Russ.).Sanford,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;J. and Garrod,&nbsp;S.&nbsp;C. (1981), Understanding written language: Explorations of comprehension beyond the sentence, Chichester, N. Y., John Wiley &amp; Sons, Toronto.Semenova,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;V. (1998), Kachestvennyye metody: vvedeniye v gumanisticheskuyu sotsiologiyu [Qualitative Methods: An Introduction to Humanistic Sociology], Dobrosvet, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Serebrennikova,&nbsp;E.&nbsp;F. (2011), &ldquo;Key concepts of linguistic axiological analysis&rdquo;, Lingvistika i aksiologiya. Etnosemiometriya tsennostnykh smyslov [Linguistics and axiology. Ethnosemiometry of valuable meanings] in Vikulova,&nbsp;L.&nbsp;G. (ed.), Tezaurus, Moscow, Russia, 7-27 (in Russ.).Serebrennikova,&nbsp;E.&nbsp;F. (2015), &ldquo;Axiological dimension of discourse&rdquo;, Bulletin of Moscow State Linguistic University, 21, 128-137 (in Russ.).Serebrennikova,&nbsp;E.&nbsp;F. and Sadovnikova,&nbsp;O.&nbsp;N. (2021), Strategic valorizing discourse in the subject sphere of innovation, Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics. 20 (1), 158&ndash;167 (in Russ.).Serebrennikova,&nbsp;E.&nbsp;F. (ed.) (2021) Dinamika i statika v poznanii real&#39;nosti jazyka: podhody, fenomeny, sposoby reprezentacii: [Dynamics and statics in the cognition of the reality of language: approaches, phenomena, methods of representation], Irkutsk State University Publishing House, Irkutsk, Russia (in Russ.).Shteynberg,&nbsp;I., Shanin,&nbsp;T., Kovalev,&nbsp;E. &amp; Levinson,&nbsp;A. (2009), Kachestvennyye metody. Polevyye sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Qualitative methods. Field sociological research], Aletheia, St. Petersburg, Russia (in Russ.).Snow,&nbsp;D. and Benford,&nbsp;R.&nbsp;D. (1992), &ldquo;Master Frames and Cycles of Protest&rdquo;, Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, in Morris,&nbsp;A. and Mueller,&nbsp;C. (eds.), Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 133-153.Suvorova,&nbsp;E.&nbsp;V. (2016), &ldquo;Processes of inference in the nomination of phraseological units&rdquo;, Aktual&#39;nyye problemy sovremennoy nauki, tekhniki i obrazovaniya [Current problems of modern science, technology and education], vol.&nbsp;2, Publishing House of Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russia, 272-275 (in Russ.).Suvorova,&nbsp;E.&nbsp;V. (2018), Vidy inferentsij v diskurse. [Types of inferences in discourse], Philological Sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 4-1, 176-181, https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2018-4-1.41 (in Russ.).Tarrow,&nbsp;S.&nbsp;G. (1992), Power in movement: social movements and contentious politics, Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics, 3rd ed., USToldova,&nbsp;S.&nbsp;Yu. (1994), &ldquo;The structure of discourse and the mechanism of focusing as important factors in choosing the nomination of an object in the text&rdquo;, Abstract of Ph.d. dissertation in Philology, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Turner,&nbsp;M., Fauconnier,&nbsp;G. (1995), &ldquo;Conceptual integration and formal expression&rdquo;, Metaphor and symbolic activity, 10&nbsp;(3), 183-204, DOI:&nbsp;10.1207/s15327868ms1003_3Ukhova,&nbsp;L.&nbsp;V. and Zhukova,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;G. (2019), Involvement as a dominant communicative strategy of the client-oriented market, Verkhnevolzhski philological bulletin, 4, 72-80 (in Russ.).Valuyskaya,&nbsp;O.&nbsp;R. (2012), &ldquo;Text interpretative as a potential feature&rdquo;, Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, 2, 210-215 (in Russ.).Yanow,&nbsp;D. and Van Hulst,&nbsp;M. (2011), &ldquo;Frames of the political: from frame analysis to framing analysis&rdquo;, Translated from English by Tkacheva,&nbsp;K. in Vakhstein,&nbsp;V. (ed.), Sociological Review, 10&nbsp;(1-2), 87-110 (in Russ.).