The review attempts to defend the classical status of metaphysics as a stable and definite basis for any philosophical practice, and with it – and objective reality, the solidity and structure of which depend on the correct representation of the final questions about the being. This apologetic problem directly follows from the discovery in certain fragments of the analyzed book (Kuznetsov, V. Yu. (2023), Postnonclassical Unity of the World, RIPOL classic Publishing Group, Moscow) of an alarming, in the opinion of the authors, tendency to relativize generally recognized onto-gnoseological truths through the game combinatorics of disparate phenomenal data.
The review attempts to defend the classical status of metaphysics as a stable and definite basis for any philosophical practice, and with it – and objective reality, the solidity and structure of which depend on the correct representation of the final questions about the being. This apologetic problem directly follows from the discovery in certain fragments of the analyzed book (Kuznetsov, V. Yu. (2023), Postnonclassical Unity of the World, RIPOL classic Publishing Group, Moscow) of an alarming, in the opinion of the authors, tendency to relativize generally recognized onto-gnoseological truths through the game combinatorics of disparate phenomenal data.