2408-932XResearch Result. Social Studies and Humanities2408-932X10.18413/2408-932X-2023-9-3-0-43231RESEARCHES<strong>V. F. Asmus and criticism of the fascist interpretation of Hegel</strong><strong>V. F. Asmus and criticism of the fascist interpretation of Hegel</strong>TinusNikita N.TinusNikita N.tiinusnn@gmail.comBelgorod State National Research University20239300

The article is devoted to the Soviet philosopher Valentin&nbsp;F. Asmus (1894&ndash;1975) and his criticism of the fascist (including Nazi) appropriation of Hegel&#39;s thought. The question of the interpretation of the Hegelian heritage was one of the main ones in the Marxist-Leninist theory in the Stalin era. Unlike many other Soviet authors of this era, Asmus did not acknowledge that German fascism was associated with any great intellectual tradition. In particular, Asmus strongly criticized attempts to interpret Hegel as a pro-fascist thinker. Many Soviet philosophers tried to defend only the method &ndash; dialectics, but Asmus defends both Hegel&#39;s social and political views as humanistic and liberal. The first part of the article describes the context of the Soviet &quot;official philosophy&quot; in which Asmus worked. The second part contains an analysis of the criticism of the fascist interpretation of Hegel in Asmus&#39; essay &quot;The Fascist Falsification of Classical German Philosophy&quot; (1942).

The article is devoted to the Soviet philosopher Valentin&nbsp;F. Asmus (1894&ndash;1975) and his criticism of the fascist (including Nazi) appropriation of Hegel&#39;s thought. The question of the interpretation of the Hegelian heritage was one of the main ones in the Marxist-Leninist theory in the Stalin era. Unlike many other Soviet authors of this era, Asmus did not acknowledge that German fascism was associated with any great intellectual tradition. In particular, Asmus strongly criticized attempts to interpret Hegel as a pro-fascist thinker. Many Soviet philosophers tried to defend only the method &ndash; dialectics, but Asmus defends both Hegel&#39;s social and political views as humanistic and liberal. The first part of the article describes the context of the Soviet &quot;official philosophy&quot; in which Asmus worked. The second part contains an analysis of the criticism of the fascist interpretation of Hegel in Asmus&#39; essay &quot;The Fascist Falsification of Classical German Philosophy&quot; (1942).

Soviet philosophyG. HegelV. F. AsmusMarxism-LeninismHegelianismfascist ideologySoviet philosophyG. HegelV. F. AsmusMarxism-LeninismHegelianismfascist ideology

The research has been performed within the project supported by the Russian Science Foundation No&nbsp;19-18-00100 &ldquo;Domestic Philosophy of the 19th-21st Centuries in the Intellectual Space of the West: Criticism, Reception, Dialogue&rdquo; (https://rscf.ru/project/19-18-00100/).

Список литературыArzhanov,&nbsp;M. (1933), Gegelyanstvo na sluzhbe germanskogo fashizma: Kritika neogegelyanskikh teoriy natsionalizma [Hegelianism in the service of German fascism: Criticism of Neo-Hegelian theories of nationalism], Partiynoe izdatel&#39;stvo, Moscow, USSR (in Russ.).Asmus,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;F. (1942), Fashistskaya falsifikatsiya klassicheskoy nemetskoy filosofii [Fascist falsification of classical German philosophy], Gospolitizdat, Moscow, USSR (in Russ.).Asmus,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;F. (1971), &ldquo;Marx and Bourgeois historicism&rdquo;, Izbrannye filosofskie Trudy: V&nbsp;2&nbsp;t. T.&nbsp;2 [Selected philosophical works: In 2&nbsp;vol. Vol.&nbsp;2], Moscow State University Publishing House, Moscow, USSR, 206-430 (in Russ.).Bammel,&nbsp;G.&nbsp;K. (1936), &ldquo;On the fascization of the history of philosophy in Germany&rdquo;, Protiv fashistskogo mrakobesiya i demagogii [Against fascist obscurantism and demagoguery], in Dvorkin,&nbsp;I., Deborin,&nbsp;A. et al. (eds.), Sotsegiz, Moscow, USSR, 216-264 (in Russ.).Deborin,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;M. (1929), &ldquo;Resolution on contemporary problems of Marxism-Leninism&rdquo;, Vestnik kommunisticheskoy akademii [Bulletin of the Communist Academy], 32&nbsp;(2), 242-244 (in Russ.).Hegel,&nbsp;G.&nbsp;W.&nbsp;F. (1990), Filosofiya prava [Elements of the philosophy of right], Translated by Stolpner,&nbsp;B.&nbsp;G. and Levina,&nbsp;M.&nbsp;I., Mysl, Moscow, USSR (in Russ.).Hegel,&nbsp;G.&nbsp;W.&nbsp;F. (1993), Lektsii po filosofii istorii [Lectures on the philosophy of history], Translated by Voden,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;M., Nauka, Saint Petersburg, Russia (in Russ.).Istoriya vsesoyuznoy kommunisticheskoy partii (bolshevikov): Kratkiy kurs (1938) [History of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks): Short Course], Pravda, Moscow, USSR (in Russ.).Kaufmann,&nbsp;W.&nbsp;A. (2021), &ldquo;The Hegel myth and its method. Philosophical Review&rdquo;, Vox. Filosofskiy zhurnal [Vox. Philosophical journal], 2021, 32, 25-50 (in Russ.).Korsakov,&nbsp;S. (2015), &ldquo;The Institute of Philosophy and the Great Patriotic War&rdquo;, Philosophy of Science and Technology, 20&nbsp;(2), 179-192 (in Russ.).Korsakov,&nbsp;S. (2016), &ldquo;The initial stage of the Beletsky &lsquo;case&rsquo; (archival publication)&rdquo;, Philosophy Journal, 9&nbsp;(1), 164-179 (in Russ.).Kosichev,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;D. (2007), Filosofiya, vremya i lyudi [Philosophy, time and people], OLMA Media Group, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Marcuse,&nbsp;H. (1999), Reason and revolution: Hegel and the rise of social theory, Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands.Oittinen,&nbsp;V. and Viljanen,&nbsp;E. (2023), &ldquo;The anti-fascist cultural theory of Nikolai Bukharin and the concept of socialist humanism&rdquo;, In Stalin era intellectuals: Culture and Stalinism, in Oittinen,&nbsp;V. and Viljanen,&nbsp;E. (eds.), Taylor &amp; Francis, London, UK, 175-201.&ldquo;On shortcomings and mistakes in the coverage of the history of German philosophy in the late 18th and early 19th centuries&rdquo; (1944), Bolshevik [Bolshevik], 7, 16-17 (in Russ.).Perov,&nbsp;Yu.&nbsp;V. and Sergeev,&nbsp;K.&nbsp;A. (1993), &ldquo;Hegel&rsquo;s philosophy of history&nbsp;&ndash; from substance to historicity&rdquo;, Hegel,&nbsp;G.V.F. Lektsii po filosofii istorii [Hegel,&nbsp;G.&nbsp;W.&nbsp;F. Lectures on the philosophy of history], Nauka, Saint Petersburg, Russia, 5-61 (in Russ.).Schmitt,&nbsp;C. (2001), State, movement, people (includes the question of legality), Translated by Draghici,&nbsp;S. Plutarch Press, Corvallis.Sineokaya,&nbsp;Yu.&nbsp;V. (2019), &ldquo;Preface. Nietzsche&rsquo;s work in the historical and philosophical context&rdquo;, Nitsshe segodnya [Nietzsche today], in Sineokaya,&nbsp;Yu.&nbsp;V. (ed.), YaSK, Moscow, Russia, 7-40 (in Russ.).Sokolov,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;V. (2010), &ldquo;V.&nbsp;F. Asmus and the dramatic moments of his philosophical work and philosophical life&rdquo;, Valentin Ferdinandovich Asmus [Valentin Ferdinandovich Asmus], in Zhuchkov,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;A. and Blauberg,&nbsp;I.&nbsp;I. (eds.), ROSSPEN, Moscow, Russia, 10-19 (in Russ.).Tsvetkov,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;V. (2016), Marksizm kak stil [Marxism as a style], AST, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Windelband,&nbsp;W. (1910), Die Erneuerung des Hegelianismus [The renewal of Hegelianism], Universit&auml;ts- und Landesbibliothek Tirol, Tirol, Austria-Hungary (in Germ.).