Список литературы

2408-932X

Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities

2408-932X

10.18413/2408-932X-2023-9-4-0-2

3314

RESEARCHES

Between post-, de- and metasecularity: Habermas, Milbank, Zizek. Creation after nothing

Lokosova

Maria V.

Lokosova

Maria V.

mvlok@yandex.ru

Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences

2023

9400

Currently, humanitarian knowledge is in a state of “cultural war” between projects that have found the courage, after the total deconstruction inherent in postmodernity, to create their own local worlds to interpret global events. The biggest battle is for the title of the dominant cultural paradigm of our time. Pre-modernity, modernity, postmodernity or metamodernity claim to win. The German philosopher Jürgen Habermas advocates modernity in this article; at the intersection of pre-modern and post-modern stands the Anglo-Catholic theologian John Milbank; The “party” of metamodernism has not yet been formed, but the Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Zizek could be part of it. One of the most important issues, which none of the parties can do without today, is the problem of the correspondence between religious, secular and atheistic elements in the consciousness and behavior of people, since the topic of religion unexpectedly burst into the intellectual, political and everyday life at the beginning of the 21st century. The article analyzes three models of this correspondence developed by these thinkers – postsecular, de(anti)secular and metasecular. This approach, if it does not determine the winner, will help the interested researcher to understand the programs of these “parties” and choose the one that is closest to his (her) intellectual intuition.

modernitypostmodernitymetamodernitypostsecularitydesecularitymetasecularityHaber-masMilbankZizek

Список литературы

Accer, R. van den and Vermulen, T. (2020), “Periodizing the 2000s, or The Emergence of Metamodernism”, Metamodernizm. Istorichnost', Affekt i Glubina posle postmodernizma [Metamodernism. Historicity, Affect and Depth after postmodernism], in R. van den Acker (ed.). RIPOL-klassic, Moscow, Russia, 34-60 (in Russ.).

Adsett, D. (2019), “Milbank and Heidegger on the Posibility of a Secular Analogy of Being”, International Philosophical Quarterly, 59 (2), 155-173 [Online], available at: https://doi.org/10.5840/ipq2019313130 (Accessed 15 October 2023).

Berdyaev, N. A. (2002), “New Middle Ages”, Smysl istorii. Novoe srednevekov'e [Meaning of history. New Middle Ages], Canon +, Moscow, Russia, 221-310 (in Russ.).

Caputo, J. and Vattimo, G. (2007), After the death of God, Columbia Univ. Press, NY.

Epshtein, M. N. (2013), Religiya posle ateizma. Novye vozmozhnosti teologii [Religion after atheism. New possibilities of theology], AST-Press, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).

Gorski, Ph., Kyuman, D. K., Torpey, J. and VanAntwerpen, J. (ed.) (2012), The Post-Secular in Question: Religion in Contemprorary Society, NYU Press, US.

Habermas, J., (2006), Dialektika sekulyarizatsii: o razume i religii [Dialectics of secularization. About reason and religion (Dialektik der Säkularisierung)], Publishing House of Biblical Theological Institute of St. Apostle Andrew, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).

Habermas, J. (2011), Mezhdu naturalizmom i religiey: Filosofskie stat'i [Between Naturalism and Religion. Philosophical Articles], translated from German by Skuratov, M. B., Ves' mir, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).

Habermas, J. (2010), “Religion, law and politics. Political justice in a multicultural world society”, Polis. Political Studies, 2, 7-21 (in Russ.).

Habermas, J. (2009), “The boundaries between faith and knowledge: about the history of influence and the relevant importance of Kant's religious philosophy”, Kantian Journal, 2, 31-60 (in Russ.).

Hutcheon, L. (2002), The Politics of Postmodernism, Routledge, New York; London.

Karpov, B. (2012), “Conceptual foundations of the theory of desecularization”, State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide, 2, 114-165 (in Russ.).

Kasanova, Kh. (2018), “Reflecting on the postsecular: three meanings of ‘secular’ and three possibilities of going beyond it”, State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide, 4, 143-174 (in Russ.).

Kyrlezhev, A. (2012), “Postsecular conceptualization of religion. To the formulation of the problem”, State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide, 2, 52-69 (in Russ.).

Kyrlezhev, A. (2004), “Postsecular era”, Kontinent [The continent], 120 [Online], available at: https://magazines.gorky.media/continent/2004/120/postsekulyarnaya-epoha.html (Accessed 20 November 2023) (in Russ.).

Malakhov, V. S. and Letnyakov, D. E. (2020), “Shimmering secularism: religion in the Russian public space”, Polis. Political Studies, 1, 135-149 (in Russ.).

Milbank, J. (2023), Po tu storonu sekulyarnogo poryadka [Beyond Secular Order], translated by Kyrlezhev, A. I., Publishing House of the Biblical and Theological Institute of St. Andrew the Apostle; Theoesthetics, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).

Milbank, J. (2022), Teologiya i sotsial'naya teoriya: po tu storonu sekulyarnogo razuma [Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason], translated by Kyrlezhev, A. I., Uzlaner, D. A., Teoestetika, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).

Shtoekl, K. (2011), “Return of religion to social science and political philosophy”, Bogoslov.ru: Nauchny bogoslovskiy portal [Theolog.RU: Scientific theological portal] [Online], available at: https://bogoslov.ru/article/1489841 (Accessed 22 October 2023).

Tacey, D. (2004), The Spirituality Revolution: The Emergence of Contemporary Spirituality, Brunner-Routledge, N.Y.

Taylor, Ch. (2017), Sekulyarny vek [A Secular Age], translated by Vasiliev, A., Kolker, L. and Lukyanov, A., Publishing House of the Biblical and Theological Institute of St. Andrew the Apostle, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).

Trainor, B. (2012), “Theorizing Post-Secular society”, State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide, 2, 21-51 (in Russ.).

Turner, L. (2011), “Metamodernist // Manifesto”, Metamodern, URL: http://www.metamodernism.org/ (Accessed 22 November 2023)

Uzlaner, D. A. (2011), “Introduction to Postsecular Philosophy”, Logos, 3, 3-32 (in Russ.).

Vattimo, G. (2008), “Era of interpretation”, Logos, 120-128 (in Russ.).

Vermeulen, T, Akker, R. (2010), “Notes on metamodernism”, Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 2 (1), 5677, doi:10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677.

Vermeulen, T. Akker, R. (2015), “Notes on Metamodern”, Metamodern. Metamodern magazine, translated by Esipenko, A., [Online] URL: https://metamodernizm.ru/notes-on-metamodernism/ (Accessed 01 November 2023) (in Russ.).

Wittgenstein, L. (2010), Kul'tura i tsennost'. O dostovernosti [Culture and Value. On Certainty], translated by Dobroselsky, L., AST: Astrel, Moscow, (in Russ.)

Zizek, S., Milbank, J. (2020), Monstruoznost' Khrista [The Monstrosity of Christ: Paradox or Dialectic?], translated by Khamis, D. Ya, RIPOL-classic, Moscow (in Russ.)