2408-932XResearch Result. Social Studies and Humanities2408-932X10.18413/2408-932X-2024-10-4-0-73652RESEARCHES<strong>Hermeneutic and phenomenological experience of interpreting the problem of invective vocabulary</strong><br /> &nbsp;<strong>Hermeneutic and phenomenological experience of interpreting the problem of invective vocabulary</strong><br /> &nbsp;MonastyrskayaIrina A.MonastyrskayaIrina A.Mirina70@yandex.ruMalkovAlexey V.MalkovAlexey V.alexsey-malkov@yandex.ruBelgorod State Technological University named after V.G. Shukhov202410400

The present study examines the relevance of the problem of increasing aggression in society, with a particular focus on the phenomenon of invective, defined as a form of aggressive and offensive speech that is especially prevalent in everyday and virtual communication. The study explores the spread of verbal aggression in its most rudimentary form&nbsp;&ndash; obscene speech&nbsp;&ndash; among children, adolescents, and young people. The investigation of invective and obscene vocabulary as a subject of research has its origins in human nature and is not subject to dissolution with the development of civilisation, instead performing a certain functionality in the history and culture of different peoples. Concurrently, invective speech has not yet been subjected to in-depth, comprehensive analysis in domestic philosophy. The present study proposes a comprehensive analysis of this phenomenon, arguing that the integration of phenomenological and hermeneutic traditions enables the interpretation of consciousness and language. The investigation focuses on the impact of lexical expressions of invective on the formation of personality and worldview in children. The study&#39;s primary conclusions are as follows: 1)&nbsp;The initial &quot;ontological activity&quot; of consciousness, expressed in language, as a reflection of the need for sensory manifestation in a negative attitude towards something or someone, as an emotional &quot;burst&quot; of aggression in invective vocabulary, that is, not in action, but in articulation, has its positive properties; 2)&nbsp;The manifestation of such speech in society in different eras is conditioned by the need for interaction. between individuals and the evaluation of a particular phenomenon, both positive and negative; 3)&nbsp;the distinctive nature of modern society, in which information supersedes knowledge, leads to an increase in computer languages that replace living language, resulting in the impoverishment of language and the proliferation of invective and obscene vocabulary; 4)&nbsp;in contrast to preceding eras, the contemporary language is progressively losing its capacity for emotional expression. The vocabulary used for insulting or provoking others, while historically significant, currently signifies little to nothing. Fifthly, the language used by young people can be a barometer for the socio-cultural state of society. The use of impolite and impoverished language can be indicative of societal decadence, the breakdown of generational ties, the continuity of traditions and high style, and the destruction of the civilizational foundations of society and culture.

The present study examines the relevance of the problem of increasing aggression in society, with a particular focus on the phenomenon of invective, defined as a form of aggressive and offensive speech that is especially prevalent in everyday and virtual communication. The study explores the spread of verbal aggression in its most rudimentary form&nbsp;&ndash; obscene speech&nbsp;&ndash; among children, adolescents, and young people. The investigation of invective and obscene vocabulary as a subject of research has its origins in human nature and is not subject to dissolution with the development of civilisation, instead performing a certain functionality in the history and culture of different peoples. Concurrently, invective speech has not yet been subjected to in-depth, comprehensive analysis in domestic philosophy. The present study proposes a comprehensive analysis of this phenomenon, arguing that the integration of phenomenological and hermeneutic traditions enables the interpretation of consciousness and language. The investigation focuses on the impact of lexical expressions of invective on the formation of personality and worldview in children. The study&#39;s primary conclusions are as follows: 1)&nbsp;The initial &quot;ontological activity&quot; of consciousness, expressed in language, as a reflection of the need for sensory manifestation in a negative attitude towards something or someone, as an emotional &quot;burst&quot; of aggression in invective vocabulary, that is, not in action, but in articulation, has its positive properties; 2)&nbsp;The manifestation of such speech in society in different eras is conditioned by the need for interaction. between individuals and the evaluation of a particular phenomenon, both positive and negative; 3)&nbsp;the distinctive nature of modern society, in which information supersedes knowledge, leads to an increase in computer languages that replace living language, resulting in the impoverishment of language and the proliferation of invective and obscene vocabulary; 4)&nbsp;in contrast to preceding eras, the contemporary language is progressively losing its capacity for emotional expression. The vocabulary used for insulting or provoking others, while historically significant, currently signifies little to nothing. Fifthly, the language used by young people can be a barometer for the socio-cultural state of society. The use of impolite and impoverished language can be indicative of societal decadence, the breakdown of generational ties, the continuity of traditions and high style, and the destruction of the civilizational foundations of society and culture.

hermeneuticsinvectiveinvective vocabularyobscene vocabularyidentificationM. HeideggerM.M. BakhtinE. Rosenstock-Huessyhermeneuticsinvectiveinvective vocabularyobscene vocabularyidentificationM. HeideggerM.M. BakhtinE. Rosenstock-HuessyСписок литературыAkhmanova,&nbsp;O.&nbsp;S. (2012), Slovar lingvisticheskikh terminov [Dictionary of Linguistic Terms], 2nd ed., reprinted, URSS, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Arbatsky,&nbsp;L.&nbsp;A. (2000), Tolkovyy slovar russkoy brani [Explanatory Dictionary of Russian Swearing], Yauza, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Bakhtin,&nbsp;M.&nbsp;M. (1986), Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of Verbal Creativity], Iskusstvo, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Baskova,&nbsp;Y.&nbsp;S. (2006), &ldquo;Euphemisms as a Means of Manipulation in the Language of the Media: Based on Russian and English Languages&rdquo;, Abstract of Ph.D. diss. (Philology), Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russia (in Russ.).Baudrillard,&nbsp;J. (2023), Obshchestvo potrebleniya [La soci&eacute;t&eacute; de consommation: ses mythes et ses structures] [Consumer society], Transl. by Samarskaya,&nbsp;E.&nbsp;A., AST Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Egorova,&nbsp;T.&nbsp;V. (comp.) (2014), Slovar inostrannykh slov sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Dictionary of Foreign Words of the Modern Russian Language], Adelant, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Freud,&nbsp;Z. (2004), &ldquo;I and It&rdquo;, Psikhologiya bessoznatelnogo [Psychology of the unconscious], Piter, St. Petersburg, Russia, 378-390 (in Russ.).Fromm,&nbsp;E. (1994), Anatomiya chelovecheskoy destruktivnosti [Anatomy of Human Destructiveness], Respublika, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Galichkina,&nbsp;E.&nbsp;N. (2020), Kompyuternaya kommunikatsiya. Lingvisticheskiy status, znakovyye sredstva, zhanrovoye prostranstvo [Computer communication. Linguistic status, sign means, genre space], Flinta, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Galyashina,&nbsp;E.&nbsp;I. (2003), Osnovy sudebnogo rechevedeniya: Monografiya [Fundamentals of judicial speech science: Monograph], in prof. Gorbanevsky, M.&nbsp;V. (ed.), STENSI, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Golev,&nbsp;N.&nbsp;D. (2000), &ldquo;Juridification of natural language as a jurislinguistic problem&rdquo;, Yurislingvistika-2. Russkiy yazyk v yego yestestvennom i yuridicheskom bytii [Jurislinguistics-2: problems and prospects /Jurislinguistics-2. Russian language in its natural and legal existence], in Golev,&nbsp;N.&nbsp;D. (ed.), Publishing house of Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia, 8-41 (in Russ.).Gritsanov,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;A. (1998), Noveyshiy filosofskiy slovar [The Newest Philosophical Dictionary], Publishing House of Skakun, V.&nbsp;M., Minsk, Belarus (in Russ.).Heidegger,&nbsp;M. (1993), &ldquo;Letter on Humanism&rdquo;, Vremya i bytiye: stati i vystupleniya [Time and being: articles and speeches], Transl. by Bibikhin,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;V., Respublika, Moscow, Russia, 192-220 (in Russ.).Heidegger,&nbsp;M. (1993), &ldquo;The Path to Language&rdquo; Vremya i bytiye: stati i vystupleniya [Time and being: articles and speeches], Transl. by Bibikhin,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;V., Respublika, Moscow, Russia, 264-271 (in Russ.).Joyce,&nbsp;J. (1993), Uliss: Roman [Ulysses: a novel], Transl. by Khinkis,&nbsp;V. and Khoruzhy,&nbsp;S., Respublika, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Karpoyan,&nbsp;S.&nbsp;M. (2014), &ldquo;Epistemic modality in online commentary&rdquo;, Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation, Rostov-on-Don, Russia (in Russ.).Komlev,&nbsp;N.&nbsp;G. (2006), Slovar inostrannykh slov: (boleye 4500 slov i vyrazheniy) [Dictionary of Foreign Words: (more than 4500 words and expressions)], Eksmo, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Koryakovtsev,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;V. (2009), &ldquo;Invective as a Functional-Semantic Category of the Russian Language&rdquo;, Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation (Philology), Kemerovo, Russia (in Russ.).Kusov,&nbsp;G.&nbsp;V. (2011), Analiz i diagnostika priznakov verbalnogo oskorbleniya v sudebnoy lingvisticheskoy ekspertize (tipovaya metodika): Monografiya [Analysis and diagnostics of signs of verbal insult in forensic linguistic examination (standard methodology): Monograph], Publishing House &ldquo;Yug&rdquo;, Krasnodar, Russia (in Russ.).Maslov,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;S. (2014), &ldquo;Zoometaphors-Invectives in the Modern Russian Language (Experimental Study)&rdquo;, Abstract of Ph.d. dissertation (Philology), Belgorod State Univercity, Belgorod, Russia (in Russ.).Mokienko,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;M. and Nikitina,&nbsp;T.&nbsp;G. (2001), Bolshoy slovar russkogo zhargona [Large Dictionary of Russian Jargon], Norint, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Monastyrskaya,&nbsp;I.&nbsp;A. (2001), &ldquo;The &lsquo;Grammatical method&rsquo; by O. Rosenstock-Hussey as a methodology of the humanities&rdquo;, Seriya &laquo;Symposium&raquo;: Metodologiya gumanitarnogo znaniya v perspektive XXI veka. Vyp. 12 [The series &ldquo;Symposium&rdquo;: The methodology of humanitarian knowledge in the perspective of the XXI century. Iss&nbsp;12], Materials of the international scientific conference. May 18, 2001, St. Petersburg [Online], available at: http:/antropology.ru/ru/text/monastyrskaya-ia / (Accessed 08 December 2024) (in Russ.).Monastyrskaya,&nbsp;I.&nbsp;A., Pipia,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;T., Ryazantseva,&nbsp;L.&nbsp;V. (2022), &ldquo;The problem of subjectivity in the digital space: socio-political, legal and ethical aspects&rdquo;, Politicheskiye i sotsialno-ekonomicheskiye vyzovy, ugrozy i transformatsii sovremennoy Rossii: Monografiya [Political and socio-economic challenges, threats and transformations of modern Russia: Monograph], in prof. Chizhova, E.&nbsp;N. (ed.), Publishing house of Belgorod State Technological University, Belgorod, Russia, 150-162 (in Russ.).Moskvin,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;P. (2017), Evfemizmy v leksicheskoy sisteme sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Euphemisms in the lexical system of the modern Russian language], Lenand, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Motroshilova,&nbsp;N.&nbsp;V. (2010), Tsivilizatsiya i varvarstvo v epokhu globalnykh krizisov [Civilization and barbarism in the era of global crises], Publishing house of the Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Kanon+; Reabilitatsiya, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Mukhina,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;S. (1985), Detskaya psikhologiya [Child psychology], in Venger,&nbsp;L.&nbsp;A. (ed.), Prosveshcheniye, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Nefedov,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;I. and Shcherban,&nbsp;Yu.&nbsp;Yu. (1971), Iskusstvo vospitaniya v semye [The Art of Parenting in the Family], Narodnaya asveta, Minsk, Belarus (in Russ.).Nikitina,&nbsp;T.&nbsp;G. (2009), Molodezhnyy sleng: tolkovyy slovar: okolo 20 000 slov i frazeologizmov [Youth Slang: Explanatory Dictionary: approx. 20,000 Words and Phraseologisms], 2nd ed., corrected and enlarged, AST; Astrel, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Petrova,&nbsp;N.&nbsp;E. and Ratsiburskaya,&nbsp;L.&nbsp;V. (2011), Yazyk sovremennykh SMI: sredstva rechevoy agressii [The language of modern media. Means of speech aggression], Flinta, Nauka, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Plutser-Sarno,&nbsp;A. (2001), Bol&#39;shoy slovar mata. T.&nbsp;1 [Large Dictionary of Swearing. Vol.&nbsp;1], Limbus Press, St. Petersburg, Russia (in Russ.).Pozolotin,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;Y. (2005), &ldquo;Invective designations of a person as a linguocultural phenomenon&rdquo;, Ph.D. Thesis, Volgograd State Pedagogical University, Volgograd, Russia (in Russ.).Rosenstock-Huessy,&nbsp;E. (2000), Izbrannoye. Yazyk roda chelovecheskogo [Selected Works. The Language of the Human Race], Universitetskaya kniga, Moscow; St. Petersburg, Russia (in Russ.).Rubtsova,&nbsp;E.&nbsp;A. (2009), &ldquo;Lingvocultural analysis of youth slang of the early 21st century (based on print media)&rdquo;, Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation, RUDN University, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Semenova,&nbsp;N.&nbsp;V. (2008), &ldquo;Linguistic diagnostics of the invective word&rdquo;, Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation, Moscow State Linguistic University, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Senichkina,&nbsp;E.&nbsp;P. (2004), Slovar evfemizmov russkogo yazyka [Dictionary of Russian Euphemisms], Nauka, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Skrebtsova,&nbsp;T.&nbsp;G. (2018), Kognitivnaya lingvistika: klassicheskiye teorii, novyye podkhody [Cognitive linguistics: classical theories, new approaches], YASK, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Steksova,&nbsp;T.&nbsp;I. (2013), &ldquo;Verbal Aggression in Internet Comments as Manifestation of Social Tension&rdquo;, Political linguistics, 3, 77-81 (in Russ.).Stepin,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;S. (1996), Epokha peremen i stsenarii budushchego: Izbr. sots.-filos. publitsistika [The era of change and scenarios of the future: Elected soc.-philos. Journalism], Publishing house of the Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Tsena slova: Iz praktiki lingvisticheskikh ekspertiz tekstov SMI v sudebnykh protsessakh po zashchite chesti, dostoinstva i delovoy reputatsii (2004) [The concept of honor, dignity and business reputation: Controversial media texts and problems of their analysis and evaluation by lawyers and linguists], in Simonov,&nbsp;A.&nbsp;K. and Gorbanevsky,&nbsp;M.&nbsp;V. (eds), Medea, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Zhelvis,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;I. (1990), Emotivnyy aspekt rechi. Psikholingvisticheskaya interpretatsiya rechevogo vozdeystviya [Emotive Aspect of Speech. Psycholinguistic interpretation of speech impact], Publishing house of Yaroslavl State University, Yaroslavl, Russia (in Russ.).Zhelvis,&nbsp;V.&nbsp;I. (2001), Pole brani: skvernosloviye kak sotsialnaya problema v yazykakh i kulturakh mira [Battlefield: Profanity as a Social Problem in the Languages and Cultures of the World], Ladomir, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).Zolotarenko,&nbsp;T.&nbsp;A. (2013), &ldquo;Invective Essence Levels&rdquo;, Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, 1, 142-145 (in Russ.).&nbsp;