<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-932X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-932X</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-932X-2025-11-4-0-3</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">3995</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>RESEARCHES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;The transformation of the concept of &amp;#39;network&amp;#39; in social research methodology&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;The transformation of the concept of &amp;#39;network&amp;#39; in social research methodology&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Teplov</surname><given-names>Alexander S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Teplov</surname><given-names>Alexander S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>teplov-2000@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/humanities/2025/4/Социогуманитарные_исследования_2025_Т.11_4-32-46.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>One of the most important characteristics of philosophical and socio-humanitarian science at the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries is the constant updating of conceptual and terminological apparatus, which is due to the high rate of real changes in society. The article begins the analysis of the history of the development of network theory within the boundaries of social philosophy by referring to the work of the 50&amp;rsquo;s by J. A. Barnes, in which the author suggests using the metaphor of the network to describe complicated social relations. Next, the article examines a number of modern approaches presented in the works of M. Castells, M. McLuhan, H. Rosa and S. Zuboff and confirming the basic intuition about the high heuristic of the network understanding of modern society. In the context of addressing the broad contextual field of social theory, the factors of technological progress, economic dependence, correlation with the educational environment, problems of extended ecological theory and a number of other aspects directly related to the development of the network approach are studied. Addressing these contexts makes it possible to better reveal the specifics of modern methodological strategies and, at the same time, identify a number of problematic areas in socio-humanitarian knowledge. The article substantiates the thesis according to which a consistent consideration of the transformation of social theory, which has made the transition from anthropological in the spirit of network analysis to modern concepts such as &amp;ldquo;supervisory capitalism&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;McDonaldization&amp;rdquo;, etc., is key to understanding the foundations of research on the current state of public relations.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>One of the most important characteristics of philosophical and socio-humanitarian science at the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries is the constant updating of conceptual and terminological apparatus, which is due to the high rate of real changes in society. The article begins the analysis of the history of the development of network theory within the boundaries of social philosophy by referring to the work of the 50&amp;rsquo;s by J. A. Barnes, in which the author suggests using the metaphor of the network to describe complicated social relations. Next, the article examines a number of modern approaches presented in the works of M. Castells, M. McLuhan, H. Rosa and S. Zuboff and confirming the basic intuition about the high heuristic of the network understanding of modern society. In the context of addressing the broad contextual field of social theory, the factors of technological progress, economic dependence, correlation with the educational environment, problems of extended ecological theory and a number of other aspects directly related to the development of the network approach are studied. Addressing these contexts makes it possible to better reveal the specifics of modern methodological strategies and, at the same time, identify a number of problematic areas in socio-humanitarian knowledge. The article substantiates the thesis according to which a consistent consideration of the transformation of social theory, which has made the transition from anthropological in the spirit of network analysis to modern concepts such as &amp;ldquo;supervisory capitalism&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;McDonaldization&amp;rdquo;, etc., is key to understanding the foundations of research on the current state of public relations.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Network</kwd><kwd>network analysis</kwd><kwd>network society</kwd><kwd>social theory</kwd><kwd>technological progress</kwd><kwd>globalization</kwd><kwd>Internet</kwd><kwd>social programming</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Network</kwd><kwd>network analysis</kwd><kwd>network society</kwd><kwd>social theory</kwd><kwd>technological progress</kwd><kwd>globalization</kwd><kwd>Internet</kwd><kwd>social programming</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ack><p>The research is carried out at expense of RSF project No. 25-28-00707 &amp;ldquo;Social Programming as a Problem of Network Self-Organization&amp;rdquo;.</p></ack><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Afanasov, N.&amp;nbsp;B. (2019), &amp;ldquo;Free time as a new form of labour: digital professions and capitalism&amp;rdquo;, Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 1, 43-61 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2658-7734-2019-00002; EDN: XBDYVK</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Barnes, J.&amp;nbsp;A. (1954), &amp;ldquo;Class and Committees in a Norwegian Island Parish&amp;rdquo;, Human Relations, 7(39), 39-58.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Baudrillard, J. (2016), The society of the spectacle: its myths and structures. Transl. from French by Samarskaya, E.&amp;nbsp;A., Respublika: Kulturnaya revolyutsiya, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Bauman, Z. (2007), Consuming life, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Bogatyr, N. A. (2015), &amp;ldquo;Network analysis in anthropology: history and modernity&amp;rdquo;, Innovatsii v antropologii: novye napravleniya, obekty i metody v rossiyskikh antropologicheskikh issledovaniyakh, Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology RAS, Moscow, Russia, 35-38 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Boissevain, J. (1979), &amp;ldquo;Network analysis: a reappraisal&amp;rdquo;, Current Anthropology, 20(2), 392-394.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Castells,&amp;nbsp;M. (2000), The information age: economy, society and culture. Transl. from English by Shkaratan, O. I. (scientific ed.), Publishing House of the Russian State Library, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.). EDN: QQLCTZ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Castells, M. (2004), The Internet galaxy: reflections on the Internet, business, and society. Transl. from English by Matveev, A., Kharitonov,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;(ed.), U-Factoriya, Yekaterinburg, Russia (in Russ.). EDN: QTKHYD</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Dikov, A.&amp;nbsp;V. (2019), &amp;ldquo;The evolution of the Internet from its origins to the present and beyond&amp;rdquo;, Shkolnye tekhnologii, 2, 3-8 (in Russ.). EDN: AFWQIF</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Lifton,&amp;nbsp;R.&amp;nbsp;J. (1993), The protean self: human resilience in an age of fragmentation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Lisenkova,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;A. (2021), Transformatsiya sotsiokulturnoy identichnosti v tsifrovom prostranstve [Transformation of socio-cultural identity in digital space], PGIK, Perm, Russia (in Russ.). EDN: TOSUPY</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>McLuhan,&amp;nbsp;M. (2003), Ponimaniye media: vneshniye rasshireniya cheloveka [Understanding media: the extensions of man], Transl. from English by Nikolaev,&amp;nbsp;V., KANON-Press-Ts, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.). EDN: QOCITF</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Petrova,&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp;V. (2008), &amp;ldquo;Health and the problem of human adaptation&amp;rdquo;, Philosophy of Science, 13(1), 114-123 (in Russ.). EDN: TQUXVZ.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Petrova,&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp;V. (2017), &amp;ldquo;Information environment and its impact on the individual: problems of human ecology in the information society&amp;rdquo;, Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences, 5, 98-114 (in Russ.). EDN: ZDPHHR</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Pruzhinin,&amp;nbsp;B.&amp;nbsp;I., Shchedrina,&amp;nbsp;T.&amp;nbsp;G., and Shchedrina,&amp;nbsp;I.&amp;nbsp;O. (2023), &amp;lsquo;Social programming in the student audience: motivation for cognition&amp;rsquo;, Voprosy filosofii, 10, 5-15 (in Russ.), DOI: 10.21146/0042-8744-2023-10-5-15; EDN: FYZZCS</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Ritzer, G. (2011), Makdonaldizatsiya obshchestva 5, [The McDonaldization of society 5], Transl. from English by Lazarev,&amp;nbsp;A., Praksis, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.). EDN: QUSGWH</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Rosa,&amp;nbsp;H. (2013), Social acceleration: a new theory of modernity, Columbia University Press, New York, USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Rozin, V. M. (2006), Ponyatiye i sovremennyye kontseptsii tekhniki [The concept and modern theories of technology], Institute of Philosophy RAS, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.). EDN: SUPILH</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Sanjek, R. (1974), &amp;lsquo;What is network analysis, and what is it good for?&amp;rsquo;, Reviews in Anthropology, 1(4), 588-597.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Spitzer, M. (2014), Antimozg: tsifrovyye tekhnologii i mozg [The mindless: digital technologies and the brain], Transl. from German by Grishin,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;G., AST, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Zuboff, S. (2022), Epokha nadzornogo kapitalizma. Bitva za chelovecheskoye budushcheye na novykh rubezhakh vlasti [The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power], Transl. from English by Vasiliev,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;F., Gaidar Institute Publishing House, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>