<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-932X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-932X</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-932X-2025-11-4-0-4</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">3996</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>RESEARCHES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Mercy as an Element of the Common Good in User Discourse in the Russian Social Media Segment&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Mercy as an Element of the Common Good in User Discourse in the Russian Social Media Segment&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Grigoreva</surname><given-names>Maria V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Grigoreva</surname><given-names>Maria V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>mariya.grigoreva@hse.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Sokolova</surname><given-names>Ekaterina N.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Sokolova</surname><given-names>Ekaterina N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>e.sokolova@hse.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Balakina</surname><given-names>Julia V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Balakina</surname><given-names>Julia V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>julianaumova@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Higher School of Economics National Research University</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/humanities/2025/4/Социогуманитарные_исследования_2025_Т.11_4-47-63.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>In the digital age, traditional moral categories undergo significant transformation, both in meaning and in the ways they are expressed. Mercy, deeply rooted in philosophical and religious traditions, has become a subject of mass discussion in social media, where it acquires new forms of representation. The relevance of this study stems from the need to empirically explore how values traditionally associated with ethics and axiology are interpreted and reproduced in user practices of online interaction. The novelty of the research consists in analyzing mercy not in an abstract philosophical framework but through a large corpus of user-generated content from the Russian segment of social media collected between September 30, 2024 and April 1, 2025. Using the Brand Analytics system, over one million public messages were retrieved; topic modeling (LDA) revealed 25&amp;nbsp;clusters of values, among which the &amp;ldquo;Kindness and Humanity&amp;rdquo; cluster (approximately 70,000 messages) was of primary relevance. The focused analysis was conducted on a sub-sample of about 19,000 texts explicitly containing mercy-related lexicon. The results demonstrate that mercy most frequently appears in contexts of requests for help and charitable practices&amp;nbsp;&amp;ndash; both toward people and animals&amp;nbsp;&amp;ndash; along with congratulatory and gratitude formulas, personal narratives and reflections, and its linkage with demands for justice. The distribution across contexts is analytical rather than rigid, aiming to show the relative volume of messages while acknowledging possible overlaps and interpretative variations. The findings confirm the ambivalent nature of mercy: on the one hand, it retains the status of a sacralized moral ideal; on the other, it functions as an instrumental frame for mobilizing resources and as an element of digital self-presentation. Overall, mercy in social media emerges as a hybrid value, combining spiritual and ethical orientations with utilitarian practices of collective action and social bonding.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In the digital age, traditional moral categories undergo significant transformation, both in meaning and in the ways they are expressed. Mercy, deeply rooted in philosophical and religious traditions, has become a subject of mass discussion in social media, where it acquires new forms of representation. The relevance of this study stems from the need to empirically explore how values traditionally associated with ethics and axiology are interpreted and reproduced in user practices of online interaction. The novelty of the research consists in analyzing mercy not in an abstract philosophical framework but through a large corpus of user-generated content from the Russian segment of social media collected between September 30, 2024 and April 1, 2025. Using the Brand Analytics system, over one million public messages were retrieved; topic modeling (LDA) revealed 25&amp;nbsp;clusters of values, among which the &amp;ldquo;Kindness and Humanity&amp;rdquo; cluster (approximately 70,000 messages) was of primary relevance. The focused analysis was conducted on a sub-sample of about 19,000 texts explicitly containing mercy-related lexicon. The results demonstrate that mercy most frequently appears in contexts of requests for help and charitable practices&amp;nbsp;&amp;ndash; both toward people and animals&amp;nbsp;&amp;ndash; along with congratulatory and gratitude formulas, personal narratives and reflections, and its linkage with demands for justice. The distribution across contexts is analytical rather than rigid, aiming to show the relative volume of messages while acknowledging possible overlaps and interpretative variations. The findings confirm the ambivalent nature of mercy: on the one hand, it retains the status of a sacralized moral ideal; on the other, it functions as an instrumental frame for mobilizing resources and as an element of digital self-presentation. Overall, mercy in social media emerges as a hybrid value, combining spiritual and ethical orientations with utilitarian practices of collective action and social bonding.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>mercy</kwd><kwd>digital morality</kwd><kwd>social media</kwd><kwd>empathy</kwd><kwd>value clusters</kwd><kwd>discourse</kwd><kwd>charity</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>mercy</kwd><kwd>digital morality</kwd><kwd>social media</kwd><kwd>empathy</kwd><kwd>value clusters</kwd><kwd>discourse</kwd><kwd>charity</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ack><p>The article was prepared at the National Research University Higher School of Economics as part of a government-funded research project of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (project No. FI-2025-83 &amp;laquo;Modern Technologies of Socio-Political Communication&amp;raquo;).</p></ack><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Abou Hashish, E.&amp;nbsp;A. (2025), &amp;ldquo;Compassion through technology: Digital empathy concept analysis and implications in nursing&amp;rdquo;, Digital Health, 11, Article ID: 20552076251326221, DOI: 10.1177/20552076251326221</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Baudrillard, J. (2005), The Intelligence of Evil or the Lucidity Pact, Translated by Turner, C., BERG, Oxford; New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Berdyaev, N.&amp;nbsp;A. (1993), O naznachenii cheloveka [On the Purpose of Man], Respublika, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Berezina, E.&amp;nbsp;M. (2012), &amp;ldquo;The secular and religious dimension of mercy&amp;rdquo;, Perm Scientific Centre Journal, 2, 49-55 (in Russ.). EDN: PZYRIP</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Berezina,&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp;M. (2018), &amp;ldquo;Charity: an experience of concept definition&amp;rdquo;, Bulletin of PNRPU. Culture. History. Philosophy. Law, 1, 5-10 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.15593/perm.kipf/2018.1.01; EDN: YVHVAG</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Bourdieu, P. (1986), &amp;ldquo;The forms of capital&amp;rdquo;, Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Richardson J. (ed.), Translated by Nice, R., Westport (Conn.), Greenwood press, London, 241&amp;ndash;258, [Online], available at: https://home.iitk.ac.in/~amman/soc748/bourdieu_forms_of_capital.pdf. (Accessed 07 October 2025)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Brady, W.&amp;nbsp;J., Wills, J.&amp;nbsp;A., Jost, J.&amp;nbsp;T., Tucker, J.&amp;nbsp;A. and Van Bavel, J.&amp;nbsp;J. (2021), &amp;ldquo;How social learning amplifies moral outrage expression in online social networks&amp;rdquo;, Science Advances, Aug 13;7(33):eabe5641. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abe5641. PMID: 34389534; PMCID: PMC8363141.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Chernyshevsky,&amp;nbsp;N.&amp;nbsp;G. (1944), &amp;ldquo;Antropologicheskiy printsip v filosofii&amp;rdquo; [The Anthropological Principle in Philosophy], Gospolitizdat, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Craft,&amp;nbsp;B.&amp;nbsp;A. (2020), &amp;laquo;Gazing Into the Digital Face of Levinas: The Ethics of Self and Other in Cyberspace&amp;raquo;, Mediacommons Project (Online), January 7, URL: https://mediacommons.org/fieldguide/content/gazing-digital-face-levinas-ethics-self-and-other-cyberspace (Accessed 07 October 2025)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Floridi, L. (2018), &amp;ldquo;Soft Ethics and the Governance of the Digital&amp;rdquo;, Philosophy &amp;amp; Technology, 31, 1-8. DOI: 10.1007/s13347-018-0303-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Friesem, Y. (2018), &amp;ldquo;Developing digital empathy: a holistic approach to media literacy research methods&amp;rdquo;, Digital Multimedia: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, in Zheng, R. (ed.), IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 271&amp;ndash;287. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-3822-6.ch014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Gaidarenko,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;M., Marinina,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;E. and Vasicheva,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;N. (2020), &amp;ldquo;Average external empathy v social system&amp;rdquo;, Problems of modern pedagogical education, 68-2, 409-411 (in Russ.) EDN: PDYQPX</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Garrett,&amp;nbsp;P.&amp;nbsp;M. (2017), &amp;ldquo;Encountering the &amp;lsquo;greatest ethical philosopher&amp;rsquo;: Emmanuel Levinas and social work&amp;rdquo;, International Social Work, 60&amp;nbsp;(6), 1457-1468, DOI: 10.1177/0020872817706407</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Kislyakov, P. A. (2022), &amp;ldquo;Socio-psychological analysis of the image of charity and volunteerism in the digital environment&amp;rdquo;, Monitoring, 5, 322-346 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2022.5.2225; EDN: DJAIPV</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Klisanin, D. (2011), &amp;ldquo;Is the Internet giving rise to new forms of altruism?&amp;rdquo;, Media Psychology Review (Online), 3, 1, November 27, URL: https://cdn2.psychologytoday.com/assets/attachments/85256/internetaltruism-klisanin.pdf. (Accessed 07 October 2025).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Knowles,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;P. (2022), &amp;ldquo;E-Word? McLuhan, Baudrillard, and verisimilitude in preaching&amp;rdquo;, Religions, 13&amp;nbsp;(12), 1131, DOI: 10.3390/rel13121131</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Levinas, E. (1998), &amp;ldquo;Time and the Other&amp;rdquo;, Vremya i Drugoy. Gumanizm drugogo cheloveka [Time and the Other. Humanism of the Other], Vysshaya religiozno-filosofskaya shkola, St. Petersburg, Russia, 23&amp;ndash;103 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Levinas, E. (2000), Izbrannoe: Totalnost i beskonechnoe [Selected Works: Totality and Infinity], Kulturnaya initsiativa, Moscow, Russia; Universitetskaya kniga, St. Petersburg, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Mossner, C. and Walter, S. (2024), &amp;ldquo;Shaping social media minds: Scaffolding empathy in digitally mediated interactions&amp;rdquo;, Topoi, 43&amp;nbsp;(3), 645-658, DOI: 10.1007/s11245-024-10034-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>O&amp;rsquo;Reilly, M., Kiyimba, N. and Levine, D. (2024), &amp;ldquo;Promoting a digital ethics of care: A digital cognitive interruption to facilitate U.K. adolescents&amp;rsquo; empathy in online spaces&amp;rdquo;, Journal of Children and Media, 19&amp;nbsp;(2), 307--326. DOI: 10.1080/17482798.2024.2411417</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Rachmad, Y. E. (2017), &amp;ldquo;Digital Empathy Theory&amp;rdquo;, &amp;Sigma;&amp;pi;ά&amp;rho;&amp;tau;&amp;eta;. &amp;Delta;&amp;iota;&amp;epsilon;&amp;theta;&amp;nu;ή&amp;sigmaf; Έ&amp;kappa;&amp;delta;&amp;omicron;&amp;sigma;&amp;eta; &amp;Beta;&amp;iota;&amp;beta;&amp;lambda;ί&amp;omega;&amp;nu;, 14&amp;nbsp;(8). DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/9D8NQ; PMID: 40093701; PMCID: PMC11907611.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Schoofs, L., Claeys, A.-S., De Waele, A. &amp;amp; Cauberghe, V. (2019), &amp;ldquo;The role of empathy in crisis communication: Providing a deeper understanding of how organizational crises and crisis communication affect reputation&amp;rdquo;, Public Relations Review, 45&amp;nbsp;(5), 101851. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101851</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Skoropad, T. A. (2024), &amp;ldquo;Altruism in the interpretation of Russian religious philosophy&amp;rdquo;, Diskurs, 10&amp;nbsp;(2), 18&amp;ndash;28 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32603/2412-8562-2024-10-2-18-28; EDN: BSZVQI</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Soina, O.&amp;nbsp;S. and Sabirov, V.&amp;nbsp;Sh. (2014), &amp;ldquo;Metaphysical and anthropological foundations of F.M. Dostoevsky&amp;rsquo;s ethics&amp;rdquo;, Solovevskie issledovaniya (Solovyov Studies), 2&amp;nbsp;(42), 186-203 (in Russ.). EDN: SHBUML</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Sokolova, E. N. (2011), &amp;ldquo;Dalnevostochniki&amp;rdquo; i &amp;ldquo;zapadniki&amp;rdquo;. Vzaimnye obrazy i osnovaniya dlya proektirovaniya effektivnykh modeley mezhelitnoy kommunikatsii v protsesse razvitiya Dalnego Vostoka (&amp;ldquo;Far Easterners&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;Westerners&amp;rdquo;: mutual images and grounds for designing effective models of inter-elite communication in the development of the Far East), Fond &amp;ldquo;Petropavlovsk&amp;rdquo;, (in Russ.), [Online], available at: http://ppfond.ru/files/ODV_web (Accessed: 25 September 2025)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Sokolova, E. N. (2013), &amp;ldquo;&amp;rsquo;Far-Easterners&amp;rsquo;: the role of identity in the processes of the macro-region&amp;rsquo;s development&amp;rdquo;, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. &amp;ldquo;Political Science. History. International Relations&amp;rdquo; Series, 1, 135-143 (in Russ.). EDN: PZTYZL</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Solovyov,&amp;nbsp;V. S. (2018), Opravdanie dobra. Nravstvennaya filosofiya [The Justification of the Good. Moral Philosophy], Yurayt, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Sorokina, S. N. (2023), &amp;ldquo;Transformation of the idea of mercy in Russian culture&amp;rdquo;, Humanities of the South of Russia, 12&amp;nbsp;(3), 72-83 (in Russ.) DOI: 10.18522/2227-8656.2023.3.6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Sunil, N.&amp;nbsp;S. &amp;amp; Chukkali, S. (2023), &amp;ldquo;Is digital altruism the same as offline altruism?: An exploration of strength-based determinants among Generation Z during COVID-19 pandemic&amp;rdquo;, The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 22&amp;nbsp;(1), 26. DOI:10.46743/1540-580X/2023.2254</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>Terry, C. &amp;amp; Cain, J. (2016), &amp;ldquo;The emerging issue of digital empathy&amp;rdquo;, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80&amp;nbsp;(4), 58. DOI: 10.5688/ajpe80458</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>Tolstoy, L. N. (1911), Put zhizni [The Path of Life], Posrednik, Moscow, Russia, (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>Westra, E. (2021), &amp;ldquo;Virtue Signaling and Moral Progress&amp;rdquo;, Philosophy &amp;amp; Public Affairs, 49 (2), 156&amp;ndash;178. DOI: 10.1111/papa.12187</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><mixed-citation>Xu,&amp;nbsp;H. (2022), &amp;ldquo;Research on Emotional Support Provided by Online Community&amp;rdquo;, International Journal of Education and Humanities, 6 (2), 50-52. DOI: 10.54097/ijeh.v6i2.3347</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><mixed-citation>Zhang, J., Wang, X., Chen, O., Li, J., Li, Y., Chen, Y., Luo, Y. &amp;amp; Zhang, J. (2024), &amp;ldquo;Correction: Social support, empathy and compassion fatigue among clinical nurses: structural equation modeling&amp;rdquo;, BMC Nursing, 23&amp;nbsp;(1), 751. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02432-8</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>