<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-932X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-932X</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-932X-2026-12-1-0-2</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">4112</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>RESEARCHES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Grand narratives, network society, digital hyperreality: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;the transformation of ideological architecture&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Grand narratives, network society, digital hyperreality: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;the transformation of ideological architecture&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Suslov</surname><given-names>Ivan V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Suslov</surname><given-names>Ivan V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>suslov85@inbox.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Knyzhova</surname><given-names>Zarina Z.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Knyzhova</surname><given-names>Zarina Z.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>knyzhova@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Sidorov</surname><given-names>Sergey P.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Sidorov</surname><given-names>Sergey P.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>sidorovsp@yahoo.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Balash</surname><given-names>Vladimir A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Balash</surname><given-names>Vladimir A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>vladimirbalash@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><institution>Saratov National Research State University named after N. G. Chernyshevsky</institution></aff><aff id="aff1"><institution>Saratov State Law Academy</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/humanities/2026/1/НР._Социогуманитарные_исследования_Т.12_1-19-29.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>This article examines how ideological discourse has changed in the context of digital civilisation and the networked organisation of modern society. The relevance of the study is determined by the need for theoretical understanding of new forms of ideological influence in the context of mediatization and digitalization of public consciousness. The work analyzes the civilizational and temporal dynamics of ideological processes, revealing the relationship between types of communication technologies and the structure of social time. The novelty of this approach lies in its appeal to a media philosophical perspective, allowing us to consider ideology as a media-conditioned phenomenon whose form and intensity depend on the technical and cultural parameters of the era. It is shown that the digital environment does not eliminate ideology, but rather transforms it, transferring it into the sphere of everyday communication, visual codes, and affective forms of political participation. Reideologization is interpreted as a response to a crisis of identity and trust amid the disintegration of traditional institutions. The study demonstrates that ideology in the 21st century is ceasing to be an institutionally fixed system of views, transforming into a distributed network of signs, images, and affects that regulate collective perception and political identity. It concludes that contemporary ideological dynamics are determined by the interaction of three factors &amp;ndash; the crisis of historical time, the network organization of society, and the media simulation of reality &amp;ndash; creating a new architecture of ideological space.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This article examines how ideological discourse has changed in the context of digital civilisation and the networked organisation of modern society. The relevance of the study is determined by the need for theoretical understanding of new forms of ideological influence in the context of mediatization and digitalization of public consciousness. The work analyzes the civilizational and temporal dynamics of ideological processes, revealing the relationship between types of communication technologies and the structure of social time. The novelty of this approach lies in its appeal to a media philosophical perspective, allowing us to consider ideology as a media-conditioned phenomenon whose form and intensity depend on the technical and cultural parameters of the era. It is shown that the digital environment does not eliminate ideology, but rather transforms it, transferring it into the sphere of everyday communication, visual codes, and affective forms of political participation. Reideologization is interpreted as a response to a crisis of identity and trust amid the disintegration of traditional institutions. The study demonstrates that ideology in the 21st century is ceasing to be an institutionally fixed system of views, transforming into a distributed network of signs, images, and affects that regulate collective perception and political identity. It concludes that contemporary ideological dynamics are determined by the interaction of three factors &amp;ndash; the crisis of historical time, the network organization of society, and the media simulation of reality &amp;ndash; creating a new architecture of ideological space.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>ideology</kwd><kwd>digital society</kwd><kwd>mediatization</kwd><kwd>re-ideologization</kwd><kwd>power</kwd><kwd>mass communications</kwd><kwd>mass consciousness</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>ideology</kwd><kwd>digital society</kwd><kwd>mediatization</kwd><kwd>re-ideologization</kwd><kwd>power</kwd><kwd>mass communications</kwd><kwd>mass consciousness</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ack><p>The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, Project No.&amp;nbsp;25-28-03315 &amp;ldquo;Chronopolitical regimes of modern ideological projects&amp;rdquo;.</p></ack><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Baudrillard, J. (2015), Simulyakry i simulyatsiya [Simulacra and Simulation (Simulacres et&amp;nbsp;simulation)], Translated by Kachalov,&amp;nbsp;A., Ripol-klassik, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Baudrillard, J. (2000), Simvolicheskiy obmen i smert [Symbolic Exchange and Death], Translated by Zenkin, S. N., Dobrosvet, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Beck,&amp;nbsp;U. (1992), Risk society: Towards a new modernity, London; Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Bell, D. (1999), Gryadushchee postindustrialnoe obshchestvo: opyt sotsialnogo prognozirovaniya [The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting], Translated from English by Inozemtsev,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;L. (ed.), Academia, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Bell, D. (1960), The end of ideology: On the exhaustion of political ideas in the fifties, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Butina, S. L. (2002), &amp;ldquo;The Transformation of Mythology in the Aspect of State Formation&amp;rdquo;, Nauchnyy ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava UrO RAN [Scientific Yearbook of the Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 3, 67-82 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Castells, M. (2007), &amp;ldquo;Communication, power and counter-power in the network society&amp;rdquo;, International Journal of Communication, 1, 238&amp;ndash;266.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Castells, M. (2000), Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo i kultura. T.&amp;nbsp;1: Vlast identichnosti [The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol.&amp;nbsp;1: The Power of Identity], Translated from English, Shkaratan,&amp;nbsp;O.&amp;nbsp;I. (sc. ed.), HSE University, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Castells,&amp;nbsp;M. (2000), The rise of the network society, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford; Malden, MA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Foucault, M. (2002), &amp;ldquo;What is Enlightenment?&amp;rdquo;, in Intellektualy i vlast: Izbrannye politicheskie stati, vystupleniya i intervy [Intellectuals and Power: Selected Political Articles, Speeches, and Interviews], Translated by Ofertas,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;Ch., general editors Vizgin,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;P. and Skuratov,&amp;nbsp;B.&amp;nbsp;M., Praksis, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Gilder, G. (1994), Life after television. W. W. Norton &amp;amp; Company New York, NY.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Goran,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;P. (1990), Drevnegrecheskaya mifologema sudby [The Ancient Greek Mythologeme of Fate], Nauka, Novosibirsk, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Habermas, J. (2007), Tekhnika i nauka kak &amp;ldquo;ideologiya&amp;rdquo; [Technology and Science as &amp;quot;Ideology&amp;quot;], Translated from German, Kildyushov,&amp;nbsp;O.&amp;nbsp;V. (ed.), Praksis, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Habermas, J. (1989), The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Jaspers, K. (1991), Smysl i naznachenie istorii [The Origin and Goal of History], Translated from German, Politizdat, Moscow, USSR (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Komkov, O. A. (2020), &amp;ldquo;On the Existential Status of Culture in Karl Jaspers Philosophy of History&amp;rdquo;, Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 4, 118-126 (in Russ.). EDN: TOIFXW</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Le Goff, J. (2007), Tsivilizatsiya Srednevekovogo Zapada [The Civilization of the Medieval West], Translated from French, general ed. Babintsev,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;A., U-Faktoriya, Yekaterinburg, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Lyotard, J.-F. (1985), The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Markov, B. V. (2018), &amp;ldquo;The Unfinished Revolution: The Political Philosophy of the Frankfurt School&amp;rdquo;, Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 1, 79-90 (in Russ.). doi:10.21638/11701/spbu17.2018.108; EDN: YTSJSW</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>McLuhan, M. (1964), Understanding media: The extensions of man, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>McLuhan, M. and Fiore, Q. (2012), Voyna i mir v globalnoy derevne [War and Peace in the Global Village], Translated by Letberg,&amp;nbsp;I., AST; Astrel, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Morozov, E. (2011), The net delusion: The dark side of internet freedom, PublicAffairs, New York, NY.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Mouffe, C. (2005), On the political, Routledge, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Negroponte, N. (1995), Being digital, Knopf, New York, NY.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Ong,&amp;nbsp;W.&amp;nbsp;J. (1982), Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. Methuen, London, UK.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Penner, R.V., Tikhonova, S.V. (2024), &amp;ldquo;Generations of the Frankfurt School: The Genesis of Critical Theory and Its Modernity&amp;rdquo;, Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 40&amp;nbsp;(1), 81-96 (in Russ.). doi: 10.21638/spbu17.2024.107; EDN: SAEPQO</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Poster, M. (1995), The second media age, Polity Press, Cambridge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Rheingold, H. (2000), The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Rubtsov,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;V. (2018), &amp;ldquo;The Illusions of the Deideologization. Between Rehabilitation of the Ideological and Ban on Nationalization of Ideology&amp;rdquo;, Voprosy filosofii, 6, 66-75 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.7868/S0042874418060055; EDN: URPPEP</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>Tishchenko, N. V. (2018), &amp;ldquo;Ideology in the Context of Cultural Practices: L.&amp;nbsp;Althusser, A.&amp;nbsp;Gramsci, G.&amp;nbsp;Debord&amp;rdquo;, Society: philosophy, history, culture, 1, 143-147 (in Russ.). doi:10.24158/fik.2018.1.30; EDN: YLLTKX</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>Tocqueville, A. (1997), Staryy poryadok i revolyutsiya [The Old Regime and the Revolution], Translated from French, Moscow Philosophical Foundation, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>Wodak, R. (2015), The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Sage Publications, London, UK. doi:10.4135/9781446270073</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><mixed-citation>Zuboff, S. (2019), The age of surveillance capitalism, PublicAffairs, New York, NY.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>