<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-932X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-932X</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-932X-2016-2-2-27-33</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">641</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>RESEARCHES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>THE STRUGGLE FOR THE TRUTH: CRITICISM OF RELATIVISM IN PLATO’S AND ILYENKOV’S DOCTRINE OF THE IDEAL</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>THE STRUGGLE FOR THE TRUTH: CRITICISM OF RELATIVISM IN PLATO’S AND ILYENKOV’S DOCTRINE OF THE IDEAL</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Vakhitov</surname><given-names>Rustem R.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Vakhitov</surname><given-names>Rustem R.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>Rust_R_Vahitov@mail.ru</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/humanities/2016/2/27-33.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Teachings about the ideal occur in the history of philosophy as a response to the challenge of ethical relativism. So it was in ancient Greek philosophy, where Plato, rejecting the doctrine of the Sophists on the general formation and relativity of the truth, introduced the hypothesis of Eidos. So it was in the Soviet philosophy of the 1960s, when E.V. Ilyenkov criticized the doctrine of D.I. Dubrovsky, who treated the ideal as subjectivity. Ilyenkov showed that it is impossible to prove the truth, and the ideals and scientific research itself without the objective existence of the ideal. In this regard, Plato and Ilyenkov, no matter how different their concepts are, appear as two representatives of the classical thought.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Teachings about the ideal occur in the history of philosophy as a response to the challenge of ethical relativism. So it was in ancient Greek philosophy, where Plato, rejecting the doctrine of the Sophists on the general formation and relativity of the truth, introduced the hypothesis of Eidos. So it was in the Soviet philosophy of the 1960s, when E.V. Ilyenkov criticized the doctrine of D.I. Dubrovsky, who treated the ideal as subjectivity. Ilyenkov showed that it is impossible to prove the truth, and the ideals and scientific research itself without the objective existence of the ideal. In this regard, Plato and Ilyenkov, no matter how different their concepts are, appear as two representatives of the classical thought.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Plato</kwd><kwd>E.V. Ilyenkov</kwd><kwd>ideal</kwd><kwd>true</kwd><kwd>relativism</kwd><kwd>sophistry</kwd><kwd>D.I. Dubrovsky</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Plato</kwd><kwd>E.V. Ilyenkov</kwd><kwd>ideal</kwd><kwd>true</kwd><kwd>relativism</kwd><kwd>sophistry</kwd><kwd>D.I. Dubrovsky</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Badiou,&amp;nbsp;A. Manifesto for Philosophy. St.&amp;nbsp;Petersburg: Machina, 2003. 184&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>2.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Boiko,&amp;nbsp;М. Reality &amp;ndash; This is an Illusion. Interview with Vadim Rudnev. Nezavisimaya gazeta. NG Ex libris. June&amp;nbsp;24, 2010. No.&amp;nbsp;23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>3.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Dubrovsky,&amp;nbsp;D.&amp;nbsp;I Why Subjective Reality or &amp;quot;Why Information Processes do not Go in the Dark?&amp;quot; (The Answer to D.&amp;nbsp;Chalmers). Voprosy filosofii. No.&amp;nbsp;3 (2007). Pp.&amp;nbsp;90-104.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>4.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Losev,&amp;nbsp;А.&amp;nbsp;F., Takho-Godi,&amp;nbsp;А.&amp;nbsp;А. Plato and Aristotle. Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya. 2005. 392&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>5.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Ilyenkov,&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp;V. Philosophy and Culture. Moscow: Politizdat, 1991. 464&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>6.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Kant,&amp;nbsp;I. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, which Might Occur as a Science. Treatises. St.&amp;nbsp;Petersburg: Nauka, 1996. Pp.&amp;nbsp;147-258.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>7.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Plato. Theaetetus. Phaedo. Feast. Phaedrus. Parmenides. Moscow: Mysl, 1999. Pp.&amp;nbsp;192-274.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>8.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Plekhanov,&amp;nbsp;I.&amp;nbsp;A. D.&amp;nbsp;I.&amp;nbsp;Dubrovsky and E.&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;Ilyenkov: Unfinished Debate on the Nature of Mind and the Ideal. Bulletin of the N.&amp;nbsp;I.&amp;nbsp;Lobachevsky Nizhni Novgorod University. No.&amp;nbsp;1(6) (2007). Pp.&amp;nbsp;153-162.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>9.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Chanyshev,&amp;nbsp;А.&amp;nbsp;N. The Philosophy of the Ancient World. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 2001. 703&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>