<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-932X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-932X</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-932X-2016-2-4-40-48</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">988</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>RESEARCHES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>THE PROBLEM OF CRIME IN FYODOR DOSTOEVSKY'S NOVEL “DEMONS” AND GEORGE ORWELL’S “1984”</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>THE PROBLEM OF CRIME IN FYODOR DOSTOEVSKY'S NOVEL “DEMONS” AND GEORGE ORWELL’S “1984”</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Bardykova</surname><given-names>Irina V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Bardykova</surname><given-names>Irina V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>IBardykova@bsu.edu.ru</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/humanities/2016/4/40-48.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The article considers the problem of “Orwell and Dostoevsky” from the point of the intertextual poetic. The author proceeds from the position that intertextuality is a form of existence of literature, and there isn’t any text which is free from the external influences, which spread over the genres and the smallest language elements, such as quotations, allusions, reminiscences and using the words of others. In the article, it is demonstrated that the object of intertextual poetics is not a text per se but those that include this text in visible and latent relations with other texts, some kind of text interference. The subject of the study is the intertextual links of the novels “1984” by G. Orwell and “Demons” by F.M. Dostoevsky. The problem of crime, common for both writers, has become a new perspective and dimension of intertextual relations. The study is aimed at revealing the mechanisms of incorporation, assimilation and transformation of the elements of pre-text (“Demons”) into the manifest text (“1984”), and at illustrating how the process of intertextuality works on the narrative plots with common theme motivation. 
The common motives, plot elements, transformations and modifications of events dealing with the description of different types of criminals and crimes, their causes and results are analyzed in the article. The character of a “person of iniquity and lawlessness” from Dostoevsky (Pyotr Verkhovensky, Shigalev, Stavrogin, Fedka the Convict) becomes archetypal and presents itself as a matrix, a behavioral model embodied into the figures of the novel “1984” (O'Brien, Smith, Syme, Parsons).</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article considers the problem of “Orwell and Dostoevsky” from the point of the intertextual poetic. The author proceeds from the position that intertextuality is a form of existence of literature, and there isn’t any text which is free from the external influences, which spread over the genres and the smallest language elements, such as quotations, allusions, reminiscences and using the words of others. In the article, it is demonstrated that the object of intertextual poetics is not a text per se but those that include this text in visible and latent relations with other texts, some kind of text interference. The subject of the study is the intertextual links of the novels “1984” by G. Orwell and “Demons” by F.M. Dostoevsky. The problem of crime, common for both writers, has become a new perspective and dimension of intertextual relations. The study is aimed at revealing the mechanisms of incorporation, assimilation and transformation of the elements of pre-text (“Demons”) into the manifest text (“1984”), and at illustrating how the process of intertextuality works on the narrative plots with common theme motivation. 
The common motives, plot elements, transformations and modifications of events dealing with the description of different types of criminals and crimes, their causes and results are analyzed in the article. The character of a “person of iniquity and lawlessness” from Dostoevsky (Pyotr Verkhovensky, Shigalev, Stavrogin, Fedka the Convict) becomes archetypal and presents itself as a matrix, a behavioral model embodied into the figures of the novel “1984” (O'Brien, Smith, Syme, Parsons).</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Dostoevsky</kwd><kwd>Orwell</kwd><kwd>pretext</kwd><kwd>manifest text</kwd><kwd>intertext</kwd><kwd>latent intertextuality</kwd><kwd>crime</kwd><kwd>reminiscence</kwd><kwd>transformation</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Dostoevsky</kwd><kwd>Orwell</kwd><kwd>pretext</kwd><kwd>manifest text</kwd><kwd>intertext</kwd><kwd>latent intertextuality</kwd><kwd>crime</kwd><kwd>reminiscence</kwd><kwd>transformation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Bulgakov,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;N. Russian Tragedy. Dostoevsky Art in Russian Thought in 1881&amp;ndash;1931. Moscow: Kniga, 1990. Pp. 193-214.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Dostoevsky,&amp;nbsp;F.&amp;nbsp;M. Demons. Complete Set of Works: in 30&amp;nbsp;volumes. Vol.&amp;nbsp;10. Leningrad: Nauka, 1974. 518&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Dostoevsky,&amp;nbsp;F.&amp;nbsp;M. Demons: The Chapter &amp;ldquo;With Tikhon&amp;rdquo;: Handwritten Editions. Complete Set of Works: in 30&amp;nbsp;volumes. Vol.&amp;nbsp;11. Leningrad: Nauka, 1974. 415&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Dostoevsky,&amp;nbsp;F.&amp;nbsp;M. Diary of a Writer 1873. Articles and Notes, 1873&amp;ndash;1878. Complete Set of Works: in 30&amp;nbsp;volumes. Vol.&amp;nbsp;21. Leningrad: Science, 1980, 551&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Manchev,&amp;nbsp;B. The Conflict and &amp;ldquo;Existential Transition&amp;rdquo; in the Novels of Dostoevsky. Filologicheskie zapiski: Vestnik literaturovedeniya i yazykoznaniya. [Philological notes: Journal of literary criticism and linguistics]. Iss.&amp;nbsp;XI. Voronez: Publishing house of the Voronezh State University, 1998. Pp.&amp;nbsp;55-65.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Camus,&amp;nbsp;A. Creativity and Freedom. Moscow: Raduga, 1990. 608&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Kasatkina,&amp;nbsp;T.&amp;nbsp;A. About Creative Nature of Word. Ontological Status of Word in The Dostoevsky&amp;rsquo;s Creation as A Basis of &amp;ldquo;Realism in a Highest Sense&amp;rdquo;. Moscow: IMLI RAN, 2004. 480&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Kibal&amp;rsquo;nik,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;A. Problems of Intertextual Poetics of Dostoevsky. St. Petersburg: Publish House &amp;ldquo;Petropolis&amp;rdquo;, 2013. 432&amp;nbsp;с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Orwell,&amp;nbsp;G. 1984. The Animal Farm. Moscow: DEM, 1989. Pp.&amp;nbsp;13&amp;ndash;243.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Pyegie-Gro,&amp;nbsp;N. The Introduction in Intertextual Theory. Moscow: Publ. house LKI, 2008. 240&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Rozanov,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;V. About Dostoevsky. Dostoevsky Art in Russian Thought in 1881&amp;ndash;1931. Moscow: Kniga, 1990. Pp.&amp;nbsp;64-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Saraskina,&amp;nbsp;L.&amp;nbsp;I. &amp;ldquo;Demons&amp;rdquo;: Prevention Novel. Moscow: Sovetsky pisatel, 1990. 480&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Svitel&amp;rsquo;sky,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;A. Poetic of Author Assessment in Literature Prose of Dostoevsky in 1860-1870. Filologicheskie zapiski: Vestnik literaturovedeniya i yazykoznaniya. [Philological notes: Journal of literary criticism and linguistics]. Iss.&amp;nbsp;XI. Voronez: Publishing house of the Voronezh State University, 1998. Pp.&amp;nbsp;46-54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Semenova,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;G. Metaphysics of Russian Literature. In 2&amp;nbsp;Vols. Vol.&amp;nbsp;1. Moscow: Publishing house &amp;ldquo;Po Rog&amp;rdquo;, 2004. 512&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Ustin,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;K. Culturalgenetic Experiment. St.&amp;nbsp;Petersburg: SuperMax, 1995. 105&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>British Culture of the Postwar. An Introduction to Literature and Society. 1945-1999. Ed. by A.&amp;nbsp;Davies and A.&amp;nbsp;Sinfield. L.; N.Y., 2000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Lachmann,&amp;nbsp;R. Memory and Literature. Intertextuality in Russian Modernism. Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1997. 470&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Ward&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;C. Twentieth-Century English Literature. L.; N.Y., 1964. 240&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>