2408-932XНаучный результат. Социальные и гуманитарные исследования2408-932X10.18413/2408-932X-2021-7-2-0-152439MISCELLANEOUS: СООБЩЕНИЯ, ДИСКУССИИ, РЕЦЕНЗИИ<strong>Развитие исторических и антропологических знаний о Центрально-Азиатском регионе в Западной Европе и США</strong><strong>Development of historical and anthropological knowledge about the Central Asian region in the Western Europe and USA</strong><br /> &nbsp;АскаровМирзохид Махаммаджон углиAskarovMirzokhid M.mirzokhid.askarov90@gmail.comТашкентский государственный университет востоковедения20217200

Усиление интеграционных процессов в мире, трансформация современной идентичности и риск потери &laquo;самости&raquo;, а также снижение чувства единства в полиэтническом обществе&nbsp;&ndash; все это порождает необходимость научных исследований национальной идентичности. На сегодняшний день в мире функционируют несколько институтов и центров по исследованию идентичности узбеков и других народов Центральной Азии. Были исследованы вопросы религиозной (исламской) идентичности, гендерные взаимоотношения, культурное наследие, советская политика по отношению к местной культуре (REEI, IU Bloomington; IEAS, UC Berkeley; CEERES, UChicago (США) и др.); вопросы изучения истории, археологии, этнологии, антропологии, лингвистики, миграционные процессы народов Средней Азии и Кавказа (RSAA, Cambridge; SOAS, ULondon; SSS, UManchester (Великобритания) и др.); вопросы узбекской идентичности и идентификации, исламской культуры и идентичности, святые места, теоретическая антропология (Max Planck ISA (Германия)); а также продолжают свои исследования некоторые центры в Европе (ESCAS, CASCA) и США (CESS) и др. Вышеперечисленные научные проекты, которые направлены на исследование идентичности (национальной, этнической) узбеков, также показывают актуальность и востребованность темы в международном масштабе. Целью статьи является показать динамику развития этих знаний на Западе, акцентируя внимание на теме идентичности узбекского народа, дать краткую характеристику и обозначить особенности каждого периода.

Strengthening of integration processes in the world, transformation of modern identity and the risk of losing &quot;self&quot;, as well as a decrease in the sense of unity in a multiethnic society &ndash; all this gives rise to the need for scientific research on the study of identity. Today in the world there are several institutes and centers for the study of the identity of Uzbeks and other peoples of Central Asia. The questions of religious (Islamic) identity, gender relations, cultural heritage, Soviet policy in relation to local culture (REEI, IU Bloomington; IEAS, UC Berkeley; CEERES, UChicago (USA), etc.); issues of studying history, archeology, ethnology, anthropology, linguistics, migration processes of the peoples of Central Asia and the Caucasus (RSAA, Cambridge; SOAS, ULondon; SSS, UManchester (Great Britain), etc.); issues of Uzbek identity and identification, Islamic culture and identity, holy places, theoretical anthropology (Max Planck ISA (Germany)); and also some centers in Europe (ESCAS, CASCA) and the USA (CESS), etc. continue their research. The above scientific projects, which are aimed at researching the (national, ethnic) identity of Uzbeks, also show the relevance and importance of this topic on an international scale. The purpose of this article is to show the dynamics of the development of this knowledge in the West and the United States, focusing especially on the identity of the Uzbek people. According to foreign studies of the identity of Central Asian peoples, the development of scientific knowledge in this direction is divided into several stages. The reference point of the &ldquo;symbolic&rdquo; beginning of the study of the studied topic is the end of World War II, since most of the Western grants for the study of the Muslim world (region) and its identity began in the post-war period. The study of each period has its own reason, purpose and objectives, subject and methodology, features and results. The article briefly reveals the nature and characteristics of each period. At the end of the article, we will try to give our reasoning and conclusions on the selected problem.

узбекская идентичностьСредняя АзияЦентральная Азияориентализмисследовательские центрырегиональные исследованиядогоняющая этнографияUzbek identityCentral AsiaCentral Asiaorientalismresearch centersregional studiescatch-up ethnographyСписок литературыАбашин,&nbsp;С.Н. От редколлегии // Антропологический форум, 2014. №&nbsp;28, С.&nbsp;137-140.Аскаров,&nbsp;М. Анализ категорий идентичности в конце XX&nbsp;&ndash; начале XXI&nbsp;века на территории современного Узбекистана (на основе англоязычных материалов) // Научный результат. Социальные и гуманитарные исследования. 2019. Т.&nbsp;5. №&nbsp;4. С.&nbsp;62-77. DOI: 10.18413/2408-932X-2019-5-4-0-6Аскаров,&nbsp;М. Англоязычная антропология о природе узбекской идентичности в конце XIX&nbsp;&ndash; начале XX&nbsp;вв. // Вестник антропологии. 2020. №&nbsp;1. (49). С.&nbsp;239-250. DOI: 10.33876/2311-0546/2020-49-1/239-258Байбурин,&nbsp;А. От редактора // Антропологический форум. 2004. №&nbsp;1. С.&nbsp;96-97.Горшенина,&nbsp;С. &laquo;Средняя / Центральная Азия&raquo;: не более чем &laquo;этикетка&raquo; для сложного историко-культурного региона с меняющимися границами // Антропологический форум. 2016. №&nbsp;28. С.&nbsp;40-47.Ибаньез-Тирадо,&nbsp;Д., Марсден,&nbsp;М. Антропологические исследования Центральной Азии в западной науке // Антропологический форум. 2016. №&nbsp;28. С.&nbsp;51-52.Петрик,&nbsp;Б. Что такое &laquo;региональные исследования&raquo; в современной антропологии (на примере Центральной Азии) // Антропологический форум. 2016. №&nbsp;28. С.&nbsp;83-89.Ривз,&nbsp;М. Антропология Средней Азии через десять лет после &laquo;состояния поля&raquo;: стакан наполовину полон или наполовину пуст? // Антропологический форум. 2014. №&nbsp;20. С.&nbsp;61-66.Ривз,&nbsp;М. След, траектория, точка давления: как переосмыслить &laquo;региональные исследования&raquo; в эпоху миграций // Антропологический форум. 2016. №&nbsp;28. С.&nbsp;97-116.Смит,&nbsp;С. Современные тенденции в антропологических исследованиях // Антропологический форум. 2004. №&nbsp;1. С.&nbsp;77-78.Соколовский,&nbsp;С. Принцип Гераклита (три гипотезы о причинах изменения традиций в антропологических исследованиях) // Антропологический форум. 2004. №&nbsp;1. С.&nbsp;84-85.Тревизани,&nbsp;Т. По тонкому льду: значение и перспективы антропологии Центральной Азии // Aтропологический форум. 2016. №&nbsp;28. С.&nbsp;122-125.Ходжаев, А. Китайский фактор в Центральной Азии. Ташкент: Изд-во &laquo;Фан&raquo; Академии наук Республики Узбекистан, 2004. 136 с.Abramson,&nbsp;D. and Karimov,&nbsp;E. Sacred Sites, Profane Ideologies: Religious Pilgrimage and the Uzbek State / in Sahadeo,&nbsp;J. &amp; Zanca,&nbsp;R. (eds) // Everyday Life in Central Asia: Past and Present. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2007. Р.&nbsp;319-338.Adams,&nbsp;L. Celebrating independence: arts, institutions, and identity in Uzbekistan, Ph.D. dissertation, Sociology, University of California, Berkeley, 1999. 241 p.Adams,&nbsp;L. Invention, institutionalization and renewal in Uzbekistan&rsquo;s national culture // European journal of cultural studies. 1999. Vol.&nbsp;2. №&nbsp;3. Р.&nbsp;355-373.Akbarzadeh,&nbsp;Sh. A note on shifting identities in the Ferghana valley // Central Asian Survey. 1997. Vol.&nbsp;16. №&nbsp;1. Р.&nbsp;65-68.Akbarzadeh,&nbsp;Sh. The political shape of Central Asia // Central Asian Survey. 1997. Vol.&nbsp;16. №&nbsp;4. P.&nbsp;517-542.Akbarzadeh,&nbsp;Sh., Saeed,&nbsp;A. Islam and political legitimacy. London: Routledge Curzon, 2003. 200&nbsp;p.Akiner,&nbsp;Sh. Melting pot, salad bowl&nbsp;&ndash; cauldron? Manipulation and mobilization of ethnic and religious identities in Central Asia // Ethnic and Racial Studies. 1997. Vol. 20. № 2. P.&nbsp;362-398.Alexander,&nbsp;C. The Anthropology of Central Asia // International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015. Vol.&nbsp;3, 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier. P.&nbsp;316-322.Askarov,&nbsp;M. Book review. Mongolia: a political history of the land and its people // Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2020. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2020.1824002Bennigsen,&nbsp;A. Islam in the Soviet Union: Religious and national problems // Religion and Atheism in the USSR and Eastern Europe. Ottawa: Carleton University Press, 1978.Bennigsen,&nbsp;A. Islam in the Soviet Union: The religious factor and the nationality problem, in Bociurkiw,&nbsp;B. and Strong,&nbsp;J. (eds) // Religion and Atheism in the USSR and Eastern Europe. London: Macmillan, 1975.Bennigsen,&nbsp;A. Islamic or local consciousness among Soviet Muslims, in Allworth, E. (ed.) // Soviet Nationality Problems. New York: Columbia University Press, 1971.Bennigsen,&nbsp;A. Modernisation and conservatism in Soviet Islam, in Dunn,&nbsp;D. (ed.) // Religion and Modernization in the Soviet Union. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1977.Bennigsen,&nbsp;A. The Muslims of European Russian and the Caucasus / in Vucinich, W. (ed.) // Russia and Asia: Essays on the influence of Russia on the Asian Peoples. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institute Press, 1972.Bennigsen,&nbsp;A., Broxup,&nbsp;M. The Islamic Threat to the Soviet State. London: Croom Helm, 1982.Bennigsen,&nbsp;A., Lemercier-Quelquejay,&nbsp;C. &ldquo;Official&rdquo; Islam in the Soviet Union, Religion in Communist Lands. 1979. Vol.&nbsp;7, III. P.&nbsp;148-159.Bennigsen,&nbsp;A., Wimbush,&nbsp;S. Muslim National Communism in the Soviet Union: a Revolutionary Strategy for the Colonial World. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1979.Bennigsen,&nbsp;A., Wimbush,&nbsp;S. Muslims of the Soviet Empire. London: Hurst, 1985. 294&nbsp;p.Carr&egrave;re d&rsquo;Encausse,&nbsp;H. Islam in the Soviet Union: Attempts at Modernisation // Religion in Communist Lands. 1974. Vol.&nbsp;2. №&nbsp;4-5. Р.&nbsp;12-20.Chari,&nbsp;S.,&nbsp;Verdery,&nbsp;K. Thinking between the posts: postcolonialism, postsocialism, and ethnography after the Cold War, Comp. Stud. Soc. History. 2009. Vol.&nbsp;51: 6. P.&nbsp;6-34.Doi,&nbsp;M.M. Gesture, Gender, Nation. Dance and Social Change in Uzbekistan, London: Bergin &amp; Garvey, 2002. 152&nbsp;p.Edgar,&nbsp;A. Bolshevism, Patriarchy, and the Nation: The Soviet &ldquo;Emancipation&rdquo; of Muslim Women in Pan-Islamic Perspective // Slavic Review, 2006. Vol.&nbsp;65.Edgar,&nbsp;A. Tribal Nation: The Making of Soviet Turkmenistan, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2004. 320&nbsp;p.Esenova,&nbsp;S. Soviet Nationality, Identity, and Ethnicity in Central Asia: Historic Narratives and Kazakh Ethnic Identity // Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs. 2002. Vol. 22. № 1. P.&nbsp;11-38.Ferrando,&nbsp;O. Manipulating the Census: Ethnic Minorities in the Nationalizing States of Central Asia // Nationalities Papers. 2008. Vol. 36. № 3. P.&nbsp;489-520.Ferrando,&nbsp;O. Soviet population transfers and interethnic relations in Tajikistan: assessing the concept of ethnicity // Central Asian Survey. 2011. Vol.&nbsp;30. №&nbsp;1. P.&nbsp;39-52.Fierman,&nbsp;W. Identity, Symbolism, and the Politics of Language in Central Asia // Europe-Asia Studies. 2009. Vol.&nbsp;61, №&nbsp;7. P.&nbsp;1207-1228.Fierman,&nbsp;W. Language and education in post-Soviet Kazakhstan: Kazakh-medium instruction in urban schools // The Russian Review. 2006. Vol. 65(1). P.&nbsp;98-116.Fierman,&nbsp;W. On Uzbek &ldquo;Nationalization&rdquo; // Anthropology &amp; Archeology of Eurasia. 2004. Vol.&nbsp;44: 4. P.&nbsp;80-85.Hanson,&nbsp;S. Central Asia and the Caucasus in the Contemporary Social Sciences, Social Science Research Council Items and Issues. 2004. Vol.&nbsp;5. №&nbsp;1-2. P.&nbsp;20-21.Hierman,&nbsp;B. Central Asian Ethnicity Compared: Evaluating the Contemporary Social Salience of Uzbek Identity in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan // Europe-Asia Studies. 2015. Vol.&nbsp;67. №&nbsp;4. Р.&nbsp;519-539.Hirsch,&nbsp;F. Empire of Nations: Ethnographic Knowledge and the Making of the Soviet Union. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2005. 392&nbsp;p.Kamp,&nbsp;M. The new woman in Uzbekistan: Islam, modernity, and unveiling under communism. USA: University of Washington Press, 2006. 320&nbsp;p.Kamp,&nbsp;M. Women-initiated unveiling: state-led campaigns in Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan // Anti-veiling campaigns in the Muslim World / edited by S.&nbsp;Cronin. London and New York: Routledge, 2014.Kandiyoti,&nbsp;D. The politics of gender and the Soviet paradox: neither colonized, nor modern? // Central Asian Survey, 2007. Vol.&nbsp;26. №&nbsp;4.Khalid,&nbsp;A. Islam after Communism: Religion and Politics in Central Asia. Berkley: University of California Press, 2007. 253&nbsp;p.Khalid,&nbsp;A. Making Uzbekistan: nation, empire, and revolution in the early USSR. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2015. 444&nbsp;p.Khalid,&nbsp;A. The Roots of Uzbekistan: Nation making in the early Soviet Union // Uzbekistan: political order, societal changes, and cultural transformations / ed. by M.&nbsp;Laruelle. Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University, 2017. P.&nbsp;1-5.Laruelle,&nbsp;M. The Nation narrated: Uzbekistan&rsquo;s Political and cultural nationalism. London; New York, 2016.Liu,&nbsp;M. Central Asia in the Post&ndash;Cold War World // Annual Review of Anthropology. 2011. Vol. 40. P.&nbsp;115-131.Liu,&nbsp;M. Detours from utopia on the Silk Road: ethical dilemmas of neoliberal triumphalism // Central Eurasian Studies Review. 2003. Vol.&nbsp;2. №&nbsp;2.Lobacheva,&nbsp;N. On the History of the Paranja // Anthropology &amp; Archeology of Eurasia. 1997. Vol. 36. № 2.&nbsp;P. 63-90.Marsden,&nbsp;M. Southwest and Central Asia: Comparison, Integration or Beyond? / ed. by R.&nbsp;Fardon et al. // The SAGE Handbook of Social Anthropology, London: Sage, 2012. P.&nbsp;340-365.Megoran,&nbsp;N. Theorizing gender, ethnicity and the nation-state in Central Asia // Central Asian Survey. 2011. Vol.&nbsp;18. №&nbsp;1. P.&nbsp;99-110.Mesbahi,&nbsp;M. Central Asia and the Caucasus After the Soviet Union: Domestic and International Dynamics. Gainesville, FA: University of Florida Press, 1994.Min Pun. The East-West Dichotomy: From Orientalism to Postcoloniality // IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS). 2019. Vol.&nbsp;24. Issue 1. Ser. 8. P.&nbsp;75-76.Montgomery,&nbsp;D. Namaz, Wishing Trees, and Vodka: The Diversity of Everyday Religious Life in Central Asia / in Sahadeo&nbsp;J. &amp; Zanca&nbsp;R. (eds) // Everyday Life in Central Asia: Past and Present, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2007. P.&nbsp;355-370.Myer,&nbsp;W. Islam and Colonialism: Western Perspectives on Soviet Asia, London&ndash;New York: Routledge &amp; Curzon, 2002. P.&nbsp;207-237.P&eacute;tric,&nbsp;B.-M. Uzbekistan Is Not a Society Based on the Ethnic Principle, But It Can Become That // Anthropology &amp; Archeology of Eurasia. 2006. Vol.&nbsp;44. №&nbsp;4. P.&nbsp;64-69.Rafiq,&nbsp;A. Orientalism and Western Academia [Электронный ресурс] URL: https://www.academia.edu/36621637/ORIENTALISM_AND_WESTERN_ACADEMIA (дата обращения: 02.08.20).Rasanagayam,&nbsp;J. Islam in Post-Soviet Uzbekistan: The Morality of Experience. Cambridge University Press, 2011. 213&nbsp;p.Roy,&nbsp;O. The New Central Asia: The Creation of Nations, New York: New York University Press, 2000. 222&nbsp;p.Said,&nbsp;E. Orientalism. London and Henley: Routledge &amp; Kegan Paul, 1978. 368&nbsp;p.Said,&nbsp;E. Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient. New Delhi: Penguin Books, 2001. 396 p.Schoeberlein-Engel,&nbsp;J. Identity in Central Asia: Construction and Contention in the Conceptions of &ldquo;&Ouml;zbek&rdquo;, &ldquo;T&acirc;jik&rdquo;, &ldquo;Muslim&rdquo;, &ldquo;Samarqandi&rdquo; and Other Groups, PhD diss., Harvard University Press, 1994.Zanca,&nbsp;R. Life in a Muslim Uzbek Village: Cotton Farming After Communism, Wadsworth: Cengage Learning, 2011. 212&nbsp;p.