DOI:
10.18413/2408-932X-2021-7-4-0-3
Theoreticism, Aestheticism, Historicism: new interpretation of critical part of M.M. Bakhtin’s ‘Toward a Philosophy of the Act’
The article proposes a hypothesis that in his work "Towards a Philosophy of the Act" M.M. Bakhtin criticized not only theoreticism and aestheticism, but also historicism. The hypothesis is supported by two arguments – an argument from the text of Bakhtin's work and an argument from the logic of Bakhtin's reasoning. A reconstruction of Bakhtin's criticism of historicism is being carried out. The article reveals the main properties inherent in historicism, according to Bakhtin, the advantages of historicism and its shortcomings. It is shown that W. Dilthey should be considered the main representative of historicism in Bakhtin’s understanding.
Keywords: Philosophy of Bakhtin,
Theoreticism,
Aestheticism,
Bakhtin’s critic of Historicism,
concrete historicity.
Number of views: 952 (view statistics)
Количество скачиваний: 2620
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Bakhtin, M. M. (2003), “Toward a Philosophy of the Act”, Sobranie sochineniy: v 7 tomakh [Collected works: in 7 vols.], 1, Russkie slovari, Moscow, Russia, 7-68 (in Russ.).
Gogotishvili, L. A. (2003a), “‘K filosofii postupka’ Postranichnye primechaniya” (2) [Toward a Philosophy of the Act. Comments], in: Bakhtin M. M. Sobranie sochineniy: v 7 tomakh [Collected works: in 7 vols.], 1, Russkie slovari, Moscow, Russia, 457-492 (in Russ.).
Gogotishvili, L. A. (2003b), “‘K filosofii postupka’ Prilozhenie” [Toward a Philosophy of the Act. Appendix], in: Bakhtin M. M. Sobranie sochineniy: v 7 tomakh [Collected works: in 7 vols.], 1, Russkie slovari, Moscow, Russia, 351-438 (in Russ.).
Granovskaya, O. L. (2019), “Berlin and Bakhtin: pluralism, polyphony and critic of relativism”, Voprosy Filosofii [Philosophical questions], 12, 41-51 (in Russ.).
Guseynov, A. A (2017), “The Philosophy of the Act as the First Philosophy (An Interpretation of Bakhtin’s Moral Philosophy) First Article: To Be Means to Act”, Voprosy filosofii [Philosophical questions], 6, 5-15 (in Russ.).
Husserl, E. (1994), Filosofiya kak strogaya nauka (“Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft”) [Philosophy as a Rigorous Science], Saguna, Novocherkassk, 127-175 (in Russ.).
Husserl, E. (1911), “Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft” (Philosophy as a Rigorous Science), Logos, book 1, Musaget, Moscow, Russia, 1-57 (in Russ.).
Krivosheev, A. V. (2007), “The Act like the basis of M. M. Bakhtin's fundamental ontology”, Tomsk State University Journal, 300 (III), 34-38. (in Russ.).
Makhlin, V. L. (2013), “Historicism (to the history of the concept)”, Literaturovedcheskiy zhurnal, 1 (33, 5-24 (in Russ.).
Rickert, H. (1998), “Philosophy of life” [Die Philosophie des Lebens: Darstellung und Kritik der philosophischen Modeströmungen unserer Zeit], Filosofiya zhizni [Die Philosophie des Lebens, Philosophy of life], Nika-Tsentr, Kiev, Ukraine, 269-443. (in Russ.).
Rutkevich, A. M. (2018), “Historicism and its Critics”, Voprosy filosofii [Philosophical questions], 12, 24-36 (in Russ).
Troeltsch, E. (1994), Istorizm i ego problemy [Der Historismus und seine Probleme, Historicism and its problems], Yurist, Moscow, Russia, (in Russ.).