Diversity of rationalities: a philosophical and practical turn
The article discusses the existing variety of interpretations of rationality, formed by refracting of the concept of "rationality" through the prism of many special approaches. The analysis is carried out from the standpoint of posing the question of reducing the described diversity to a common denominator. It is assumed that the most effective on this path would be the use of system methods to generalize the diversity of existing rationalities, highlighting invariants in them. An exit to the practical area is shown by working with priorities, the novelty of which lies in the proposed version of the game (universal) rationality, which can be used in any branch of knowledge.
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Ashby, W. R. (1956), Introduction to Cybernetics, Chapman & Hall, London, UK.
Bailey, K. D. (1994), Sociology and the New Systems Theory. Toward a Theoretical Synthesis, State University of New York Press, New York, USA.
Bertalanfi, L. (1973), “History and status of the general theory of systems”, System research, Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 20-37 (in Russ.).
Bogdanov, A. A. (1992), Tektologiya: (Vseobshchaya organizatsionnaya nauka) [Tectology. General Organizational Science], in Z. I. Gzhebina (ed.), Petersburg, Moscow, Berlin (in Russ.).
Fakhrutdinova, A. Z. (2019), “Models of rationality in the foundations of decision theory”, Philosophy of Science and Technology, 24 (1), 131-144 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21146/2413-9084-2019-24-1-131-144.
Lyubutin, K. N. and Tolmachev, V.D. (2005), Alexander Bogdanov: ot filosofii k tektologii [Alexander Bogdanov: from philosophy to tectology], in Kim, V.V. (ed.), Publishing house “Bank kul’turnoy informatsii”, Yekaterinburg, Russia (in Russ.).
Malyuta, A. N. (1991), Sistema deyatel’nosti [System of activity], Nauchnaya mysl’, Kyiv, Ukraine (in Russ.).
Malyuta, А. N. (1989), Giperkompleksnye dinamicheskie sistemy [Hypercomplex dynamical systems], Vysshaya shkola, Lviv, Ukraine (in Russ.).
Malyuta, А. N. (1990), Zakonomernosty sistemnogo razvitiya [Patterns of systemic development], Nauchnaya mysl’, Kyiv, Ukraine (in Russ.).
Mikeshina, L. A. (2013), “Reductionism as a problem of philosophy of science and epistemology”, Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 37 (3), 5-13 (in Russ.).
Mikhalov, A. (2018), “Methodological aspects of the study of the modern elite. Actual problems of public administration”, ORIPA studies digest, 4 (76), ORIPA NAPA, Оdessa, Ukraine.
Porus, V. N. (2008), U kraya kul’tury (filosofskie ocherki) [At the edge of culture (philosophical essays)], Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).
Porus, V. N. (2010), “The multidimensionality of rationality”, Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 23 (1), 5-16.
Saymon, G. А. (1993), “Rationality as a process and product of thinking”, THESIS: Theory and History of Economic and Social Institutions and Systems, 3, 16-38 (in Russ.).
Sidorina, T. Yu. (2003), Filosofiya krizisa [Philosophy of crisis], Flinta, Nauka, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).
Sinev, A. S. (2018), “Kul’turologicheskiy aspekt noosfernogo razvitiya” [Culturological aspect of noospheric development], in: Noosfernoe obrazovanie v evraziyskom prostranstve. Tom 8: Noosfernoe obrazovanie kak mekhanizm stanovleniya noosfernoy Rossii: [Noospheric education in the Eurasian space. Vol. 8: Noospheric education as a mechanism for the formation of noospheric Russia], in A.I. Subetto ed., Asterion, St. Petersburg, Russia (in Russ.).
Sorochaykin, A. N. and Filatova, A. V. (2011), “Economic rationality in modern conditions”, Bulletin of Samara State University, 9, 38-42 (in Russ.).