Humanitarian expertise and prospective genomic research
The article analyzes the influence of the so-called "humanitarian" expertise on research conducted in the field of biology of individual development. It is noted that the complex of ethical problems accompanying modern genetic developments has been formed within the framework of biomedical ethics, and fully preserves not only its advantages, but also disadvantages. The most unpleasant of them is the creation of artificial obstacles to the development of science. The most significant of these at the current stage is the creation of artificial obstacles to the development of science (the Henrietta Lacks case). The article notes that until now, the main task of ethical expertise was considered to be the protection of the patient's rights (humans, laboratory animals, etc.), but today in order to ensure optimal conditions for biomedical research aimed, ultimately, at achieving the universal human good, it is necessary to more accurately determine the limits of permissible intervention in the autonomy of the individual.
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Bioethik in den USA: Metoden. Themen. Positionen (1988), Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York (in Germ.).
Bioetika: problemy i perspektivy: Sbornik statey (1992) [Bioethics: problems and prospects: Collection of articles], IF RAN, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).
Borzenkov, V. G. (2004), “Biophilosophy in overcoming the split of culture”, Biologiya i kul'tura [Biology and culture], in Liseev, I. K. (ed.), Kanon+, Moscow, Russia, 179-201 (in Russ.).
Efroimson, V. P. (1975), “Social and biological in demographic processes”, Voprosy filosofii, 1, 63-64 (in Russ.).
Etiko-pravovye aspekty proekta “Genom cheloveka”: Mezhdunarodnye dokumenty i analiticheskie materialy (1998) [Ethical and leagal issues of the Human genome project: International documents and analytical materials)], in Ivanov, V. I., Yudin, B.G. (ed.), Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).
Fesenkova, L. V. (2003), Teoriya evolyutsii i ee otrazheniya v kul'ture [Theory of evolution and its reflection in culture], IF RAN, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).
Liseev, I. K. and Sharov, A. Ya (1970), “Human genetics, its philosophical and socio-ethical problems (Round table of ‘Questions of Philosophy’)”, Voprosy filosofii, 7, 106-115; 8, 125-134 (in Russ.).
Ogurtsov, A. P. (1992), “Ethics of Life or Bioethics: Axiological Alternatives”, Bioetika: problemy i perspektivy: Sbornik statey [Bioethics: problems and prospects: Collection of articles], IF RAN, Moscow, Russia, 5-27 (in Russ.).
Popova, O. V. (2017), Chelovek kak artefakt biotekhnologii [Man as an artifact of biotechnology], Kanon+, Reabilitatsiya, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).
Popova, O. V. (2021), “Editing the human genome in the ethical and normative field”, Sotsiogumanitarnye kontury genomnoy meditsiny [Sociohumanitary contours of genomic medicine], INION RAN, Moscow, Russia, 79-101 (in Russ.).
Tishchenko, P. D. (2001a), Bio-vlast' v epokhu biotekhnologii [Bio-power in the era of biotechnology], IF RAN, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).
Tishchenko, P. D. (2021b), “Embryo as a molecular homunculus and epigenetic being”, Sotsiogumanitarnye kontury genomnoy meditsiny [Sociohumanitary contours of genomic medicine], INION RAN, Moscow, Russia, 67-78 (in Russ.).
Veatch, R. M. (1992), “Models for Ethical Medicine in e Revolutionary Age”, Bioetika: problemy i perspektivy: Sbornik statey [Bioethics: problems and prospects: Collection of articles], IF RAN, Moscow, Russia, 36-46 (in Russ.).
Weingart, P., Kroll, J. and Bajertz, K. (1988), Rasse, Blut und Gene [Race, blood and genes], Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M. (in Germ.).
Yudin, B. G. (1991), “Biotechnology and society: results of the 80s, prospects of the 90s”, Biotekhnologiya i obshchestvo: Referativnyi sbornik INION [Biotechnology and society: Abstract collection INION], INION, Moscow, Russia, 5-17 (in Russ.).