Interdisciplinarity as a phenomenon of modern science, or
On the relevance of the ideas of M.K. Petrov
The article problematizes the ideas of the famous philosopher and methodologist of science Mikhail Konstantinovich Petrov (1923-1987), whose centenary we celebrated in April 2023. Proposed at the time by M.K. Petrov, the idea of a socio-code, as well as provisions on changes in the socio-cultural status and basic epistemological characteristics of contemporary science are discussed in the article not only in their substantive content, but also in terms of presenting the problem field in which they turn out to be very relevant today. The focus is on the concept of interdisciplinarity, which M.K. Petrov explored as a sociocultural phenomenon through the prism of human-sizedness and revealed its significance for fundamental and applied research programs.
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Galison, P. (2018), “Collective Author”, Voprosy Filosofii, 5, 93-113 (in Russ.).
Mirsky, E. M. (1972), “Interdisciplinary Research as an Object of Scientific Study”, Sistemnyye issledovaniya. Yezhegodnik 1972 [Systems research. Yearbook 1972], Nauka, Moscow, 9-23 (in Russ.).
Ogurtsov, A. P. (1988), Distsiplinarnaya struktura nauki. Yeye genezis i obosnovaniye. [Disciplinary Structure of Science. Its Genesis and Substantiation]. Nauka, Moscow (in Russ.).
Parshin, A. N. & Sedykh, O. M. (eds.) (2013), Pavel Aleksandrovich Florensky [Pavel Aleksandrovich Florensky], ROSSPEN, Moscow (in Russ.).
Petrov, M. K. (1972), Sistemnyye kharakteristiki nauchno-tekhnicheskoy deyatelnosti [System Characteristics of Scientific and Technical Activities], Sistemnyye issledovaniya. Yezhegodnik 1972 [Systems research. Yearbook 1972], Nauka, Moscow, 30-45 (in Russ.).
Petrov, M. K. (2004), Yazyk, znak, kultura [Language, Sign, Culture], Editorial URSS, Moscow (in Russ.).
Pronskikh, V. S. (2018), Kollaboratsiya bolshoy nauki kak vyzov transtsendentalnomu subyektu [Collaboration of Big Science as a Challenge to the Transcendental Subject], Voprosy Filosofii, 5, 88-93 (in Russ.).
Pruzhinin, B. I. & Shchedrina, T. G. (eds.) (2013), Epistemologicheskiy stil v russkoy intellectualnoy kul’ture XIX-XX vekov: Ot lichnosti k traditsii [Epistemological Style in Russian Intellectual Culture of the 19th-20th Centuries: From Personality to Tradition], ROSSPEN, Moscow (in Russ.).
Sadovsky, V. N. (2010), Filosofiya v Moskve v 50-ye i 60-ye gg. [Philosophy in Moscow in the 50s and 60s], in: Lektorsky, V. A. (ed.), Kak eto bylo: vospominaniya i razmyshleniya [How it Was: Memories and Reflections], ROSSPEN, Moscow, 385‒412 (in Russ.).
Shchedrina, T. G. (2011), Arkhiv epokhi: stranitsy istorii filosofii v Rossii vtoroy poloviny XX veka [Archive of the Era: Pages of the History of Philosophy in Russia in the Second Half of the Twentieth Century], Voprosy Filosofii, 6, 123-132 (in Russ.).
Shpet, G. G. (2006), Gerbert Spenser i yego pedagogicheskiye idei [Herbert Spencer and His Pedagogical Ideas], in: Shpet, G. G. Philosophia Natalis. Izbrannyye psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye trudy [Philosophia Natalis. Selected psychological and pedagogical works], ROSSPEN, Moscow, 28‒138 (in Russ.).