Philosophy and psychology competing for the status of a fundamental science
The purpose of the article is to determine the circumstances that determine the development of one of the most popular plots in stories about Husserl’s phenomenology: criticism of psychologism in the question of the foundations of scientific knowledge, as well as the subsequent accusation of Husserl himself of “psychologism”. The article shows that in the 19th century philosophy goes through a series of internal transformations caused by criticism from natural science. One of the results of this criticism is that philosophy borrows some principles for constructing scientific knowledge. These include reliance on “facts” and “experience”. When applied to the analysis of subjectivity, this leads to the analysis of mental life as a sphere of immediate certainty. Philosophy abandons the “metaphysical” concept of the soul in favor of an orientation toward “mental phenomena”, “facts of consciousness”. At the same time, psychology is being promoted to the role of the main model for the analysis of subjectivity; her method and approach can now be considered “empirical” rather than speculative. The actual process of development of both psychology and philosophy leads to the fact that psychology begins to be considered as the main model of access to mental life in general, and to consciousness as its special designated area. No version of the alternative foundation of knowledge can bypass this fundamental circumstance if it intends to offer its theory of subjectivity. This circumstance was, in our opinion, a much more serious “challenge” for Husserl and his philosophy than the tendency for psychologists to occupy philosophy departments.
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Brentano, Fr. (1973), Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. Erster Band. [Psychology from an Empirical Perspective. Vol. 1], in Kraus, O. (ed.), Meiner, Hamburg, Germany (in Germ.).
Dilthey, W. (1990), Gesammelte Schriften. Bd. V: Die geistige Welt [Collected works. Vol. V: The Spiritual World], Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen, Germany (in Germ.).
Dilthey, W. (1997), “Foundation of the sciences of man, society and history”, in Jonach, H. and Rodi, Fr. (ed.), Gesammelte Schriften. Bd. XIX [Collected works. Vol. XIX], Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen, Germany (in Germ.).
Falkenberg, R. (1916), “On Rudolf Euken's seventieth birthday”, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik [Journal of Philosophy and Philosophical Criticism],160, 1, 1-6 (in Germ.).
Husserl, E. (1991), “Phenomenology (Encyclopedia-Britannica Article)”, Transl. by Molchanov, V. I. Logos, 1, 12-21 (in Russ.).
Husserl, E. (2009), Idei k chistoy fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoy filosofii. Kniga pervaya [Ideen zu einer Reinen Phänomenologie und Phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch] [Ideas towards pure phenomenology and phenomenological philosophy. Book One. General introduction to pure phenomenology], Transl. by Mikhaylov, A. V., Akademicheskiy Proekt, Мoscow, Russia (in Russ.).
Husserl, E. (2011a), Logicheskie issledovaniya. T. I. Prolegomeny k chistoy logike [Logische Untersuchungen. Erster Band. Prolegomena zur reinen Logik] [Logical research. Vol. I. Prolegomena to pure logic], Transl. by Bernshteyn, E. A., in Frank, S. and Gromov, R. (eds), Akademicheskiy Proekt, Мoscow, Russia (in Russ.).
Husserl, E. (2011b), Logicheskie issledovaniya. T. II. Ch. 1: Issledovaniya po fenomenologii i teorii poznaniya [Logische Untersuchungen. Buch 2: Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis T. 1] [Logical research. Volume II. Part 1: Research in phenomenology and theory of knowledge], Transl. by Molchanov, V. I., Akademichesky Proekt, Мoscow, Russia (in Russ.).
Kusch, Μ. (1995), Psychologism: a case study in the sociology of philosophical knowledge, Routledge, New York; London.
Kusch, М. (2002), “Sociology of philosophical knowledge: concrete research and defense”, Logos, 35 (5-6), 1-31 (in Russ.).
Kusch, М. (2004), “The winner takes it all. Phenomenology of Life and the Triumph of Phenomenology”, Logos, 43 (3-4), 171-204 (in Russ.).
Lembeck, K.-H. (1994), Einführung in die phänomenologische Philosophie [Introduction to phenomenological philosophy], Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, Germany (in Germ.).
Mach, E. (1933), Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwicklung historisch-kritisch dargestellt [Mechanics in their development presented in a historical and critical manner], F. A. Brockhaus, Leipzig, Germany (in Germ.).
Mikhaylov, I. (2014), “Englisch Enlightenment and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. A New Epoch in European Science”, Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences, 5, 9-19 (in Russ.).
Scheler, M. (1971), Gesammelte Werke. Bd. I. Frühe Schriften [Collected Works. Vol. I: Early writings], Francke, Bern; München, Germany (in Germ.).
Sommer, M. (1985), Husserl und der frühe Positivismus [Husserl and early positivism], Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (in Germ.).
Stumpf, C. (1883), Tonpsychologie, S. Hirzel, Leipzig, Germany.
Stumpf, C. (1890), Tonpsychologie, S. Hirzel, Leipzig, Germany.