Transformations of ‘traditional everyday life’ in the paradigm of modern transgressive culture
One of the most apparent specific parameters of the modern socio-cultural situation is its obvious transgressive nature. In modern humanitarian science, within the framework of the concept of "transgression" it is customary to mean the objectively existing desire of individuals, human communities and society to overcome certain norms, values and attitudes that have been once established and institutionalized and had time to become traditional. There are whole spheres of human activity whose existence, and especially their development, is simply impossible without a high degree of transgression. First of all, they include science and the arts. Although the study of cultural transgression has a long and fruitful history (including the work of such recognized authorities as Hegel, Bataille, Foucault, etc.), in the new historical realities, the problem also acquires new semantic solutions. First of all, we attribute to such innovations the acutely actualized problem of the "points of intersection" of transgressive culture and human everyday life. Such "intersections" provide many examples of a positive impact on our lives. However, the concomitant negative potential is very high here and over time it turns out to be an increasingly obvious factor of modernity.
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Adonyeva, S. B. (2017), “Metaphysics of everyday life and the sacred”, Pervichnye znaki / Naznachennaya realnost [Primary signs / Assigned reality], Proppovsky Center, St. Petersburg, 171-192 (in Russ.).
Arpentyeva, M. R. (2017), “Avant-garde: the art of utopias, transgressions and revolutions”, Vestnik KRAESC. The Humanities, 2, 6-11 (in Russ.).
Bessokirnaya, G. P., Bolshakova, O. A. and Karakhanova, T. M. (2023), “The experience of investigating the Spiritual and Moral State of Russian Society”, Sociological Science and Social Practice, 11 (3), 6-36 (in Russ.).
Bolshakova, A. S. (2021), “Transgression”, The Scientific Heritage, 75, 49-54 (in Russ.).
Borev, Yu. B. (2012), Khudozhestvennaya kultura XX veka (teoreticheskaya istoriya) [Art culture of the 20th century (theoretical history)], UNITY-DANA, Moscow, Russia (in Russ.).
Eliseeva, A. A. (2023), “Traditional family values as an object of interest: private-legal and public-legal aspects”, Bulletin of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), 5, 68-75 (in Russ.).
Faritov, V. T. (2012), “Transgression, boundary and metaphysics in doctrine of G.W.F. Hegel”, Tomsk State University Journal, 360, 48-52 (in Russ.).
Gomes, K.-D. (2022), “Paradox of negative emotions in art: analysis of theoretical and empirical studies”, Siberian Journal of Philosophy, 20 (3), 43-56 (in Russ.).
Gritsanov, A. A. and Mozheiko, M. A. (2003), “Foucault”, Noveyshiy filosofskiy slovar [Newest philosophical dictionary] 3rd ed., corrected, Knizhnyy Dom, Minsk, Belarus, 1118-1119 (in Russ.).
Gurdzhiyan, M. V. (2016), “The traditional family in modern Russian society”, Society: Philosophy, History, Culture, 4, 41-43 (in Russ.).
Hegel, G. W. F. (2005), Nauka logiki [Wissenschaft der Logik], Nauka, St. Petersburg, Russia (in Russ.).
Ivanova, A. A. (2015), “Transformation of marriage and family relations in Russian family: comparative analysis of sociological studies”, Bulletin of higher education institutes of the North Caucasus Region. Social sciences series, 4, 27-32 (in Russ.).
Lawlor, L. and Nale, J. (2014) (eds.), “Transgression”, The Cambridge Foucault Lexicon, Cambridge University Press, New York, 509-516.
Lezhnina, Yu. P. (2016), “The main problems of crisis everyday life”, Rossiyskoe obshchestvo i vyzovy vremeni. Kniga tretiya [Russian society and the challenges of the time. Book 3], Ves Mir Publishers, Moscow, Russia, 65-87 (in Russ.).
Lokosova, M. V. (2023), “Between post-, de- and metasecularity: Habermas, Milbank, Zizek. Creation after Nothing”, Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities, 9 (4), 11-27 (in Russ.).
Nasyrova, G. Yu. (2018), “The crisis of the traditional institution of the family”, in Molodezh i nauka: shag k uspekhu. T. 2. [Youth and science: a step to success. Vol. 2.], Universitetskaya kniga, Kursk, Russia, 348-351 (in Russ.).
Paleczny, Т. and Sławik, Z. (2016), “Transgression as a result of cultural contact”, Politeja, 44, 231-250.
Samygin, S. I., Vereshchagina, A. V. and Zakirova, E. M. (2016), “The traditional family: the specifics of sociological discourse and methodological priorities”, Humanities, Socio-Economic and Social Sciences, 12, 81-85 (in Russ.).
Sergeeva, Yu.A. and Fomina, Yu.I. (2023), “Traditional family values as a factor of family viability “, Bulletin of the IPA VPA, 2, 167-171 (in Russ.).
Smirnov, A.V. (2010), “Studies of everyday life in the context of cultural science: problems of method and methodological perspectives”, Bulletin of the Leningrad State University named after A. S. Pushkin, 4, 129-135 (in Russ.).
Timoshevsky, A. V. and Savin, V. V. (2020), “Transgressions of the human: from man in culture to culture without man”, Bulletin of Saint-Petersburg State University of Culture, 1, 97-105 (in Russ.).
Verbina, O. V. and Turkina, V. G. (2023), “Everyday life in the classical historical and cultural discourse”, Science. Art. Culture, 1, 14-24 (in Russ.).
Vereshchagina, A. V., Bandurin, A. P. and Samygin, S. I. (2016), “Crisis of institute of a traditional family in Russia and family trajectories of a young family”, Humanities, Socio-Economic and Social Sciences, 11, 24-28 (in Russ.).
Yurevich, A. V. (2018), “Empirical Estimates of Modern Russian Society’s Morals”, Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 4, 46-55 (in Russ.).
Zenkin, S. (2019), “Afterword to transgression”, Logos, 29 (2), 51-63 (in Russ.).